Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:1 (2012) ► pp.115–134

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Fixing meaning

The many voices of the post-liberal hegemony in Russia

 | University of Mainz
Published online: 22 March 2012
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.06ang
This contribution looks into a speech by Russian President Vladimir Putin after the terrorist attack against a high school in the Northern Caucasian town Beslan in September 2004, widely seen as marking the end of the liberal hegemony in the Russia of the post-soviet period. However, a closer look reveals the many possible readings that are made of the speech. According to the reactions found in a corpus of press articles, the speech activates both “internationalist” and “sovereignist” readings in media discourse. By pointing out the polyphonic organization of discourse, I make the case for a productive exchange between the French tradition of discourse analysis, interactionism and critical discourse analysis. In this view, the readers have to deal with the many different voices crisscrossing political discourse. In the light of its polyphonic organization, the meaning of discourse needs to be “fixed” by the participants of political discourse.
References (24)
References
Angermüller, Johannes. 2011. From the many voices to the subject positions in anti-globalization discourse. Enunciative pragmatics and the polyphonic organization of subjectivity. Journal of Pragmatics 431, 2992—3000. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Authier-Revuz, Jacqueline. 1982. Hétérogénéité montrée et hétérogénéité constitutive. Éléments pour une approche de l’autre dans le discours. DRLAV 261, 91—151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale, 21. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A., Mikhail V. Ilyin and Jacob L. Mey. (eds.) 1998. Political Discourse in Transition in Europe 1989—1991. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culioli, Antoine. 2002. Variations sur la linguistique. Entretiens avec Frédéric Fau. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le Dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. The Role of the Reader. Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1994. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1980. Encoding/Decoding. In: Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (ed.). Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972—79. London: Hutchinson, 128—138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading. A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1970. Présentation: Une poétique runinée. In: Mikhaïl Bakhtine (ed.). La poétique de Dostoïevski. Paris: Seuil, 1—21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maingueneau, Dominique. 1993. Le Contexte de l’œuvre littéraire. Énonciation, écrivain, société. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nølke, Henning, Kjersti Fløttum and Coco Norén. 2004. ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nonhoff, Martin. 2006. Politischer Diskurs und Hegemonie. Das Projekt ‚Soziale Marktwirtschaft‘. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pêcheux, Michel. 1981. Ouverture du colloque. In: Bernard Conein, Jean-Jacques Courtine, Françoise Gadet, Jean-Marie Marandin and Michel Pêcheux (eds.). Matérialités discursives. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille, 15—18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seriot, Patrick. 2007. Généraliser l’unique: genres, types et sphères chez Bakhtine. Texto! 12 (3), http://www.revue-text-net/1996—1997/Inedits/Seriot_Bakhtine.pdf, last access on 02/03/2009.
van Dijk, Teun. 2008. Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert and Chris Bulcaen. (eds.) 1996. Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf De Cillia, Martin Reisigl, Karin Liebhart, Maria Kargl and Klaus Hofstätter. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Dudlák, Tamás
2025. Peace at all costs: polyphonic political discourse of Hungary in the Russian-Ukrainian war. Cambridge Review of International Affairs ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bekzhanova, Zhazira & Tsediso Michael Makoelle
2022. Latinization of the Kazakh Alphabet: Implications for Education, Inclusion, and Social Cohesion in Kazakhstan. Sage Open 12:4 DOI logo
Angermüller, Johannes & Adèle Petitclerc
2020. Comment devenir un universitaire ? Le discours académique : une pratique de positionnement multi-niveaux. Semen 48 DOI logo
Randour, François, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2020. Twenty years of research on political discourse: A systematic review and directions for future research. Discourse & Society 31:4 ► pp. 428 ff. DOI logo
Savski, Kristof
2020. Polyphony and polarization in public discourses: hegemony and dissent in a Slovene policy debate. Critical Discourse Studies 17:4 ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Declercq, Jana & Ricardo A. Ayala
2017. Examining “Elite” Power Dynamics in Informant–Research Relations and Its Impact on Ethnographic Data Construction. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16:1 DOI logo
Beetz, Johannes
2016. The Materiality of Language and the Decentered Subject. In Materiality and Subject in Marxism, (Post-)Structuralism, and Material Semiotics, ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Krzyżanowski, Michał
2015. Posttotalitarian Discourses in Central and Eastern Europe. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Oleinik, Anton
2015. The language of power: a content analysis of presidential addresses in North America and the Former Soviet Union, 1993–2012. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2015:236 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2014. Johannes Angermuller: Subject positions in polyphonic discourse. In The Discourse Studies Reader, ► pp. 176 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue