Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:1 (2012) ► pp.31–50
Critique and argumentation
On the relation between the discourse-historical approach and pragma-dialectics
Published online: 22 March 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.02for
At the core of critical discourse analysis lies its emancipatory agenda: arguing for social equality and against discrimination. In the case of the discourse-historical approach (DHA), this stance has been theoretically justified mainly through references to Habermas’ language-philosophy. At the same time, the analysis of actually occurring argumentative speech requires more than a theoretical underpinning of one’s critique and, here, DHA has benefitted from drawing on van Eemeren and Grootendorst’s Pragma-Dialectical argumentation theory. However, Pragma-Dialectics is not just a tool kit but rests on Popper and Albert’s critical rationalism. This results in both epistemological as well as normative conflicts at the paradigm-core of DHA between critical rationalism and Habermas’ critical theory regarding the concept of critique. In this article, we review the different epistemological and normative underpinnings of DHA and Pragma-Dialectics and discuss the consequences of implementing the latter in the former. We conclude by arguing for a coherent orientation towards Habermas’ language-philosophy in order to maintain a high degree of consistency in DHA.
References (41)
Alexy, Robert. 2010. A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Apel, Karl-Otto. 1980. The a priori of the communication community and the foundation of ethics: the problem of a rational foundation of ethics in the scientific age. In: Towards a Transformation of Philosophy. London/Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 225—300.
Biro, John and Siegel, Harvey. 2006. Pragma-Dialectics versus epistemological theories of arguing and arguments: rivals or partners. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnes van Rees (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Mahwahl/New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, 1—10.
Blair, Anthony J. 2006. Pragma-Dialectics and pragma-dialectics. In: Peter Houtlosser and Agnes van Rees (eds). Considering Pragma-Dialectics. A Festschrift for Frans H. Eemeren on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Mahwahl/New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, 11—22.
Fairclough, Norman and Wodak, Ruth. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 258—284.
Forchtner, Bernhard. 2011. Critique, the discourse-historical approach, and the Frankfurt School. Critical Discourse Studies 8 (1), 1—14.
Garssen, Bart and van Laar, Jan Albert. 2010. A Pragma-Dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges. Informal Logic 30 (2), 122—141.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1972. Wahrheitstheorien. In: 1984. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 127—183.
. 1976. What is universal pragmatics? In: 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann, 1—68.
. 1983. Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In: 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press, 43—115.
. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume I. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. London: Heinemann.
. 1991. Remarks on discourse ethics. In: 1993. Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 19—111.
. 1997. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
. 1998. Hermeneutic and analytic philosophy: two complementary versions of the linguistic turn. In: 2005. Truth and Justification. Cambridge: MIT Press, 51—81.
. 2008. Communicative reason and the detranscendentalized “Use of Reason”. In: Between Naturalism and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press. 24—76.
Hacohen, Malachi Haim. 2002. Karl Popper. The Formative years, 1902—1945. Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2008. Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.
Rehg, William. 2001. Adjusting the pragmatic turn: ethnomethodology and critical argumentation theory. In: William Rehg and James Bohman (eds). Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn. The Transformation of Critical Theory. Essays in Honour of Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 115—143.
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
. 2009. The discourse-historical approach. In: Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer (eds). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 87—121.
Siegel, Harvey and Biro, John. 2008. Rationality, reasonabless, and critical rationalism: problems with the pragma-dialectical view. Argumentation 221, 191—203.
van Dijk, Teun A. 2008. Critical Discourse Analysis and nominalization. Discourse & Society 19 (6), 821—828.
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Grootendorst, Rob. 1988. Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 2 (2), 271—291.
. 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. London: Routledge.
. 1994. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht/Cinnaminson: Foris Publications.
. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Garssen, Bart and Meuffels, Bert. 2009. Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob and Snoeck Henkemans, Francisca A. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah/New York/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Grootendorst, Rob, Jackson, Sally and Jacobs, Scott. 1993. Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. The University of Alabama Press.
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Eranfeno, Gizachew Nemomsa, Agaredech Jemaneh Gemeda & Abdissa Zerai Bamano
Serafis, Dimitris & Assimakis Tseronis
Serafis, Dimitris, Franco Zappettini & Stavros Assimakopoulos
Wang, Jiayu & Mingfeng Yang
2023. Interpersonal-function topoi in Chinese central government’s work report (2020) as epidemic (counter-)crisis discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 22:2 ► pp. 185 ff.
Salahshour, Neda & Dimitris Serafis
2022. (De-)constructing New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern’s initiative to wear the hijab after the Christchurch terrorist attack. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Serafis, Dimitris, E. Dimitris Kitis & Stavros Assimakopoulos
Kutter, Amelie
Agbozo, G. Edzordzi, Mary Edward & Fatiatu Inusah
Roderick, Ian
Zienkowski, Jan
Zienkowski, Jan
Forchtner, Bernhard & Christian Schneickert
Gachigua, Sammy Gakero
Herzog, Benno
Herzog, Benno
Krzyżanowski, Michał
Krzyżanowski, Michał & Bernhard Forchtner
Macgilchrist, Felicitas
Põiklik, Pille
Efe, Ibrahim & Bernhard Forchtner
Hansson, Sten
Wodak, Ruth
Wodak, Ruth & Bernhard Forchtner
Forchtner, Bernhard, Michał Krzyżanowski & Ruth Wodak
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
