Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 11:1 (2012) ► pp.1–30

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Argumentation and fallacy in newspaper op / ed coverage of the prelude to the invasion of Iraq

 | University of Ulster
 | King Abdulaziz University
 | University of Ulster
Published online: 22 March 2012
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.11.1.01wil
This study examines how the pre-war debate of the U.S. decision to invade Iraq was discursively constructed in pro- and anti-war newspaper op/ed argumentation. Drawing on insights from argumentation theory, and using these within a framework of Critical Discourse Analysis, we explore fallacious arguments within the ‘justification discourse’ used in the pro-war opinion/editorials (op/eds). We argue that the type of arguments marshalled by the pro-war op/ed commentators uncritically bolstered the set of U.S. official ‘truth claims’ and ‘presuppositions’. Conversely, anti-war op/ed debaters dismissed the Bush administration’s ‘neo-imperialistic’ reasoning and called into question the logic of militarist ‘humanitarianism’ by arguing that brute force and daylight ‘plunder,’ found in the language of a ‘noble ideal,’ were part of a long Western colonialist tradition that glorified the West as the ‘civiliser’ of distant cultural others.
References (69)
References
Adeodato, Joao Mauricio. 1999. The rhetorical syllogism (enthymeme) in judicial argumentation. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 121, 135—152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adler, Jonathan E. 2007. Asymmetrical analogical arguments. Argumentation 211, 83—92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altheide, David. L. and Grimes, J. N. . 2005. War Programming: the propaganda project and the Iraq War. The Sociological Quarterly 461, 617—643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aronovitch, Hillard. 1997. The political importance of analogical argument. Political Studies XLV1, 78—92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beinin, Joel. 2004. The new American McCarthyism: policing thought about the Middle East. Race & Class 46 (1), 101—115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bekalu, Mesfin Awoke. 2006. Presupposition in news discourse. Discourse & Society 17 (2), 147—172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. 2004. Ethics and intervention: the ‘humanitarian exception’ and the problem of abuse in the case of Iraq. Journal of Peace Research 41 (2),131—147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benson, Rodney and Hallin, Daniel C. 2007. How states, markets and globalization shape the news: The French and US national press, 1965—97. European Journal of Communication 22 (1), 27—48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan and Verschueren, Jef. 1998. Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boggs, Carl and Pollard, Tom. 2006. Hollywood and the spectacle of terrorism. New Political Science 28 (3), 335—351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crick, Ruth D. and Joldersma, Clarence W. 2007. Habermas, lifelong learning and citizenship education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 261, 77—95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummings, Louise. 2004. Rejecting the urge to theorise in fallacy Inquiry. Argumentation 181, 61—94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degano, Chiara. 2007. Presupposition and dissociation in discourse: A corpus study. Argumentation 211, 361—378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Wijze, Stephen. 2003. Complexity, relevance and character: Problems with teaching the ad hominem fallacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (1), 31—56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dijk,Teun A. Van. 1998. Opinions and ideologies in the press. In: Allan Bell, and Peter Garrett (eds). Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford:Blackwell, 21—63Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Grootendorst, Rob. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers: Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Grootendorst, Rob. 1995. The Pragma-Dialectical approach to fallacies. In: Hans V. Hansen and Robert C. Pinto (eds.). Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 130—144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren Frans H. Van, Grootendorst Rob, Snoeck Henkemans A. Francisca, Blair J. Anthony, Johnson Ralph H., Krabbe Erick C.W., Plantin Christian, Walton Douglas N., Willard Charles A., Woods John and David Zarefsky. 1996. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren Frans H. van, Meuffels Bert and Verburg Mariël. 2000. The (un)reasonableness of ad Hominem fallacies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 191, 416—435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren Frans H. van and Grootendorst Rob. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation:The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Houtlosser, Peter. 1999. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies 1 (4), 479—497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Strategic maneuvering: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation 201, 381—392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feteris, Eveline T. 2000. A dialogical theory of legal discussions: Pragma-Dialectical analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 81, 115—135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. A Pragma-Dialectical approach of the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation 161, 349—367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerges, Fawaz A. 1999. America and Political Islam: Clashes of Cultures or Clashes of Interests? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joshua and Hier, Sean. 2001. Crisis, mobilization and collective problematization: ‘illegal’ Chinese migrants and the Canadian news media. Journalism Studies 2 (4), 563—583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hackett, Robert A. and Zhao, Yuezhi. 1994. Challenging a master narrative: Peace protest and opinion/editorial discourse in the US press during the Gulf war. Discourse & Society 5 (4), 509—541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallin, Daniel C. and Mancini, Paolo. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartnett, Stephen J. and Stengrim, Laura A. 2004. ‘The whole operation of deception’: Reconstructing President Bush’s rhetoric of weapons of mass descruction. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies 4 (2), 152—197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikuenobe, Polycarp. 2004 On the theoretical unification and nature of fallacies. Argumentation 181, 189—201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ismael, Tareq Y. and Ismael, Jacqueline S. 2005. Whither Iraq? Beyond Saddam, sanctions and occupation. Third World Quarterly 26 (4—5), 609—629. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 2002. Messages, Functional Contexts, and Categories of Fallacy. In: Frans van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (eds.). Dialectic and Rhetoric: the Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 119—130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Nonfallacious rhetorical strategies: Lyndon Johnson’s daisy ad. Argumentation 201, 421—442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott and Aakhus, Mark. 2002. Colloquy: Talking in and about conflict—discourse studies of conflict processes. What mediators do with words: implementing three models of rational dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Quaterly 20 (2), 177—203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus. 2007. Comparing apples and oranges? Leading and misleading uses of historical analogies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 36 (1), 29—49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay and Lewis, Evan. 2004. Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly 118 (4), 569—598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lafollette, Hugh. 2005. Living on a slippery slope. The Journal of Ethics 91, 475—499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeuwen, Theo van and Wodak, Ruth. 1999. Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis. Discourse Studies 1 (1), 83—118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Letcu-Fairclough, Isabela. 2010. Argumentations, and CDA, presentation at Language, ideology and politics Workshop, Lancaster University 27th January 2010.
Manolescu, Beith Innocenti. 2006. A normative pragmatic perspective on appealing to emotions in argumentation. Argumentation 201, 327—343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen M. 2006. The Israel lobby and U.S. foreign policy. Middle East Policy XIII (3), 29—87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, Glyn. 2008. Security, stability, and international Order. American Behavioral Scientist 51 (9), 1322—1338. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolaev, Alexander and Porpora, Douglas. 2007. Talking war: How elite U.S. newspaper editorials and opinion pieces debated the attack on Iraq. Sociological Focus 40 (1), 6—25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powers, Lawerence. 1995. The one fallacy theory. Informal Logic 171, 303—314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Wodak, Ruth. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reynolds, Mike. 2000. The blending of narrative and argument in the generic texture of newspaper editorials. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (1), 25—40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, John E. and Wodak, Ruth 2009 Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom. Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4), 251—267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sahlane, Ahmed. 2009. The Discursive (Re)construction of the 2003 Iraq War in Pro- and Anti-War Opinion/Editorial Argumentation: A Critical Discourse Analytic Approach. Unpublished Ph D Thesis, The University of Ulster, School of Communication, Belfast, UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schuetz, Janice. 2005. Arguments of victims: A case study of the Timothy McVeigh trial. In: Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (eds). Argumentation in Practice. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 197—214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi-Xu. 1997. Cultural Representations: Analyzing the Discourse about the Other. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen Anne-Marie, White Peter R. R. and Aijmer Karin. 2007. Presupposition and ‘taking-for-granted’ in mass communicated political argument: An illustration from British, Flemish and Swedish political colloquy. In: Fetzer, Anita and Lauerbach, Gerda Eva (eds). Political Discourse in the Media. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 31—74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert and Aikin, Scott F. 2006. Two forms of the straw man. Argumentation 201, 345—352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 1989. Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Argumentation for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The sunk costs fallacy or argument from waste. Argumentation 161, 473—503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Argumentation schemes and historical origins of the circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument. Argumentation 181, 359—368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warren, John. 2005. War and the cultural heritage of Iraq: A sadly mismanaged affair. Third World Quarterly 26 (4—5), 815—830. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, Karin and Downing, John. 2002. Mediating terrorism: Text and protest in interpretations of the siege. Critical Studies in Media Communication 19 (4), 419—437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, John. 1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, Carol K. 2008. Encroachments on state sovereignty: The argumentation strategies of the George W. Bush administration. Argumentation 221, 473—488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak Ruth, de Cillia Rudolf, Reisigl Martin and Liebhart Karin. 1999. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh University Press. Translated by Angelica Hirsch and Richard Mitten.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. and Meyer, Michael. (eds.). 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2009. The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, John. 1998. File of fallacies: Argumentum ad baculum. Argumentation 121, 493—504.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Walter. 2000. Historical analogies, slippery slopes, and the question of euthanasia. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 281: 176—186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yaphe, Judith S. 2005. Bush policy and the (de)stabilization of the Persian Gulf. In: Louis J. Cantori and Augustus Richard Norton. (eds). Evaluating the Bush Menu for Change in the Middle East. A roundtable of the conference group at the American Political Science Association Annual meeting, Chicago, Sep.5th, 2004 Middle East Policy XII (1), 108—110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Juyan. 2007. Beyond anti-terrorism: Metaphors as message strategy of post-September -11 U.S. public diplomacy. Public Relations Review 33 (1), 31—39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Esteve-Faubel, José María, Tania Josephine Martin & Rosa Pilar Esteve-Faubel
2020. Investigating Press Coverage of Protest Songs During the 2003 Iraq War. Sage Open 10:4 DOI logo
Blassnig, Sina, Florin Büchel, Nicole Ernst & Sven Engesser
2019. Populism and Informal Fallacies: An Analysis of Right-Wing Populist Rhetoric in Election Campaigns. Argumentation 33:1 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Chang, Gordon C., Kerstin Lueck & Hugh B. Mehan
2013. Evidencing international threat. Journal of Language and Politics 12:1 ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Sahlane, Ahmed
2012. Argumentation and Fallacy in the Justification of the 2003 War on Iraq. Argumentation 26:4 ► pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Sahlane, Ahmed
2013. Metaphor as rhetoric: newspaper Op/Ed debate of the prelude to the 2003 Iraq War. Critical Discourse Studies 10:2 ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Sahlane, Ahmed
2015. Dialectics of argument and rhetoric: Protesting the Iraq War in US–British opinion press. Discourse & Society 26:6 ► pp. 754 ff. DOI logo
Sahlane, Ahmed
2022. Covering the War on Iraq. In Discourse, Media, and Conflict, ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Sahlane, Ahmed
2023. (En)Countering the ‘White’ Gaze: Native-Speakerist Rhetorics and the Raciolinguistics of Hegemony. In English as an International Language Education [English Language Education, 33], ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue