Cover not available

Article published In: Identity Politics
[Journal of Language and Politics 1:1] 2002
► pp. 115–147

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

National languages as flags of allegiance, or the linguistics that failed us

A close look at emergent linguistic chauvinism in Brazil

 | State University at Campinas, Brazil
Published online: 16 August 2002
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.1.1.08raj
This paper focuses on what appears to be the emergence of linguistic chauvinism in Brazil. Large-scale influx currently under way of foreign words (mostly from English) into the country’s national language, Portuguese, is being eyed with suspicion and distrust by large segments of the population. The current crisis was kick-started by a federal deputy in the House of Representatives who presented a controversial bill aimed at curbing the use of foreignisms by the use of law. Critics have however been quick to point out that the bill is a covert attempt to advance a political agenda. The paper examines the role of linguists in the unfolding national debate. After noting that they have by and large been set aside and have failed to bring the weight of their expert opinion to bear on the whole issue, I advance the claim that it is they themselves who are largely to blame. I conclude by making a plea that it is high time we as linguists did some soul-searching and asked ourselves whether, in our single-minded effort to theorise about language in total disregard for what the lay people think and believe about it, we have not isolated ourselves from them and rendered ourselves largely inconsequential. I suggest that Critical Linguistics may turn out to be one way of regaining some of the lost ground.
References (76)
References
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrade, O. de (1928). Manifesto antropófago. Revista de Antropologia. 11.1.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antunes, C. 2000 Língua francesa domina o Ocidente: conclusão é de “Palavras sem Fronteiras”. Folha de São Paulo. March 11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach. E. 1974. Explanatory inadequacy. In Cohen, D. (Ed.) 1974. Explaining Linguistic Phenomena. New York: John Wiley and Sons. pp. 153–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bagno, M. 2000. O deputado e a língua. Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 55–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bechara, E. 2000. A norma culta face à democratização do ensino. Text available for download on http://www.academia.org.br/ortogra.htm
Bloomfield, L. 1925. Why a linguistic society. (text of the lecture delivered on the occasion of the founding of the Linguistic Society of America). Language. 1.1. pp. 1–5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bramsted, E. K. 1965. Goebbels and National Socialist Propaganda 1925–1945. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, C. D. 1916. Language and the sentiment of nationality. American Political Science Review. 101. pp. 44–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Câmara Jr., J. M. 1970. Estrutura da Língua Portuguesa. 2nd. Ed. Petrópolis, Brazil: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cardoso, S. A. M. 1999. A geolingüística no Brasil: meio século de contribuição à ciência da linguagem e ao ensino da língua materna. Boletim da ABRALIN. No. 231. pp. 18–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Castilho, A. T. and Altman, M. C. F. S. 1994. Para a história da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística. Boletim da ABRALIN. 161. pp. 21–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaves, M. 2001. Das besteiras consagradas. O Estado de São Paulo. January 13th.
Chilton, P. (Ed.) 1985. Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Newkspeak Today. London: Frances Printer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dissanayake, W. 1989. Purism, language, and creativity: the Sri Lankan experience. In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 185–196.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faraco, C. A. 2001. Guerras em torno da língua. Folha de São Paulo. Caderno “Mais”. Pp. 30–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasold, R. 1988. What national languages are good for. In Coulmas, F. (Ed.). 1988. With Forked Tongues. Singapore: Karoma Publishers. pp. 181–194.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finatto, M. J. B. 2000. O que trai o tradutor? Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 76–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiorin, J. L. 2000. Considerações em torno do projeto de lei de defesa, proteção, promoção e uso do idioma apresentado à câmara dos deputados pelo deputado Aldo Rebelo. Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 62–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fishman, J. 1968. Nationality-nationalism and nation-nationism. In Fishman, J, Ferguson, C. A. and Das-Gupta, J. (Eds.). 1968. Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: Wiley. pp. 98–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 1987. Notes on critical linguistics. In Threadgold, T. and Steele, R. (Eds.) Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday. Amsterdam: John Bejamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guedes, P. C. 2000. E por que não nos defender da língua? Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 31–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giles, H. et al. 1995. Reactions to Anglo- and Hispanic-American-accented speakers: affect, identity, persuasion, and the English-only controversy. Language & Communication. 15.2. pp. 107–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenfield, L. 1998. Nationalism and language. In Mey, J. L. (Ed.) (1998). Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 635–641.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. 1950. Leave Your Language Alone! Ithaca, N. Y.: Linguistica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodge, R and Kress, G. 1979. Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henningsen, M. 1989. The politics of purity and exclusion: literary and linguistic movements of political empowerment in America, Africa, the South Pacific, and Europe. In In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 31–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heyd, U. 1954. Language Reform in Modern Turkey. Jerusalem: Israel Oriental Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutton, c. 1996. Law lesson for linguists? Accountability and acts of professional classification. Language & Communication. 16.3. pp. 205–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. H. and Uyangola, J. 1987. The power of English in Sri Lanka: a survey of newspaper content and text. In Singh, U. N., and Srivastava, R. N. (Eds.). 1987. Perspectives in Language Planning. Calcutta: Mithila Darshan. pp. 60–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. J. 1989. The texture of language purism: an introduction. In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 1–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Ed.) 1989. The Politics of Language Purism. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karim-Hakkak, A. 1989. Language reform movement and its language: the case of Persian. In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 81–104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P. 1987. Linguistic competence and folk theories of language. In Holland, D. & Quinn, N. (Eds.) 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, G. 1989. Language policy during the fascist period: the case of language education. In Wodak, R. (Ed.) 1989. pp. 39–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumaratunga, M. 1958. Introduction to Vyakarana Vivaranaya. Colombo: Gunasena and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The university of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemle, M. 2000. A norma culta face à heterogeneidade lingüística. Text available for download on http://www.academia.org.br/ortogra.htm
Le Page, R. B. 1964. The National Language Question: Linguistic Problems of NewlyIndepen-dent States. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niskier, A. 2000. A missão da Academia Brasileira de Letras na defesa da Língua Portuguesa. Text available for downloading on http://www.cnol.com.br/cnol/not/cam/00/11/07/12.shtml
Newmeyer, F. 1982. On the applicability of transformational-generative grammar. Applied Linguistics. 3.11. pp. 89–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986. Politics of Linguistics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. 1989. Linguists and the official language movement. Language. 65.6. pp. 579–595. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunes, E. 2001. Yankees, go home. Revista da Educação. 28th March.
Oliveira, J. L. 2000. Freio no estrangeirismo. Jornal de Brasília. August 14th.
Pennycook, A. 1994. The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. English and the Discourses of Colonialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Possenti, S. 2000. Efeito pela causa. Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 84–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, K. 1999a. Of EFL teachers, conscience, and cowardice. ELT Journal. 53. 3. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999b. Tuning up amidst the din of discordant notes: on a recent bout of identity crisis in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 9. 2. pp. 99–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999c. Critical approaches and their raison d’être: a rejoinder to Brumfit and Widdowson. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 9. 2. Pp. 127–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. Critical pedagogy and linguistic imperialism in the EFL context. TESOL Journal. 9.4. Pp. 5–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001a. ELT classroom as an arena for identity clashes. In Grigoletto, M. and Carmagnani, A. M. G. (Ed.) 2001. English as a Foreign Language: Identity, Practices, and Textuality. São Paulo: Humanitas, Pp. 23–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001b. Review of A. S. Canagarajah: Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Word. 52 (3). Pp. 462–466.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, K. and Rajagopalan, C. forthcoming The English language in Brazil — a boon or a bane?. In Braine, G. (Ed.) Teaching English to the World. Alexandria, VA, USA.: TESOL Publishers.
Rebelo, A. 2000. Projeto de Lei nº 1676/1999. Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 9–17. The text, in its entirety, is available for downloading on http://www.cnol.com.br/cnol/not/cam/00/11/07/12.shtml
2001. Você é contra estrangeirismos na TV paga? Revista PayT. V. no. 791.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riocento, T. 1995. A brief history of language restrictionism in the United States. In Dicker, S. et al. (Eds.) 1995. Official English? No! TESOL. Alexandria, VA. pp. 21–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A. D. 1993. Línguas indígeneas: 500 anos de descobertas e perdas. D. E. L. T. A. 9. 1. pp. 83–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouquié, A. 2000. A França e a defesa da latinidade. The text, in its entirety, is available for downloading on http://www.cnol.com.br/cnol/not/cam/00/11/07/12.shtml
Sader, E. 2001. O Brasil fora da Alca. Folha de São Paulo. April 3.
Schmitz, J. R. 2000. Em defesa da língua portuguesa: defendê-la de quem e de quê? Boletim da ALAB. Year 4. No. 4. pp. 43–47.
Scliar-Cabral, Leonor. 1999. Definição da política lingüística no Brasil. Boletim da ABRALIN. No. 231. pp. 7–17Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segismundo, F. 2000. A preservação do Português nos meios de comunicação. The text, in its entirety, is available for downloading on http://www.cnol.com.br/cnol/not/cam/00/11/07/12.shtml
Skuttnab-Kangas, T. 1999. Linguistic human rights — Are you naïve or what? TESOL Journal. 8/3. pp. 6–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sullivan, N. and Schaz, R. T. 1999. When cultures collide: the official language debate. Language & Communication. 19. 3. 261–275.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, G. 1992. Linguistic Purism. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treanor, P. 1997. Tower of Tudjman. Language & Communication. 17. 1. 67–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinstein, B. 1989. Francophonie: purism at the international level. In Jernudd, B. H. and Shapiro, M. J. (Eds.) 1989. pp. 53–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Huo, Xiangying
2020. The Proliferation of English as a “World” Language. In Higher Education Internationalization and English Language Instruction, ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Lucena, Maria Inêz Probst & Ana Cecília da Gama Torres
2019. Ideologia monolíngue, mercantilização e instrumentalização da língua inglesa na alteração da LDB em 2017 e em anúncios publicitários de cursos livres. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 19:3 ► pp. 635 ff. DOI logo
Silva, Daniel N.
2015. Introduction. Pragmatics and Society 6:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Spolsky, B. & R.D. Lambert
2006. Language Planning and Policy: Models. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 561 ff. DOI logo
Animasaun, Kayode, M. Lionel Bender, Patrick J. Duffley, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Victor H. Mair, Victor H. Mair, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Ariane Reimann-Slater, Solomon I. Sara, Jacob J. Spa, Thomas Stolz, Thomas Stolz, Yuri Tambovtsev, Graham Thurgood, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda & Edward J. Vajda
2005. Reviews. <i>WORD</i> 56:1 ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
McIntosh, Janet
2005. Language essentialism and social hierarchies among Giriama and Swahili. Journal of Pragmatics 37:12 ► pp. 1919 ff. DOI logo
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2003. The ambivalent role of English in Brazilian politics. World Englishes 22:2 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2004. Tesol and the question of learners’ cultural identity. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 145-146 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2005. Language politics and the linguist. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 5:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2008. The Role of Geopolitics in Language Planning and Language Politics in Brazil. Current Issues in Language Planning 9:2 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2016. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 2001. <i>WORD</i> 62:3 ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2017. Prescription, language politics and the field of applied linguistics: A tribute to Prof. Alan Davies. Language & Communication 57 ► pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
Rajagopalan, Kanavillil
2020. Where English Is Headed in South America: A Speculative Glimpse. In Functional Variations in English [Multilingual Education, 37], ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Spolsky, Bernard
2003. Language Policy, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue