Cover not available

Editorial published In: Democracy and Discriminatory Strategies in Parliamentary Discourse
Edited by Karin Bischof and Cornelia Ilie
[Journal of Language and Politics 17:5] 2018
► pp. 585–593

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
Editorial

Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse

 | University of Vienna
 | Strömstad Academy, Sweden


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 6 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.00017.edi
References (54)
References
Bayley, Paul (ed). 2004. “Introduction. The Whys and Wherefores of Analysing Parliamentary Discourse.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 1–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bischof, Karin, and Marion Löffler. 2016. “The Gendered Construction of the Demos. Parliamentary Debates on the Integration of Former National Socialists into the Austrian Demos.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Politics and Gender (ECPG), Uppsala, Sweden, June 13, 2015.
Bischof, Karin. 2015. Global Player EU? Eine ideologiekritische Metaphernanalyse. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bischof, Karin, and Stoegner Karin. 2009. “Towards a Comprehensive View on Prejudice.” In Handbook of Prejudice, ed. by Anton Pelinka, Karin Bischof, and Karin Stoegner, 443–462. Amherst: Cambria Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Armin. 2003. Das Parlament und seine Sprache: Studien zu Theorie und Geschichte parlamentarischer Kommunikation. Tübingen: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, David F. J., and Christian Schaller (eds). 2002. Demokratiequalität in Österreich: Zustand und Entwicklungsperspektiven, Opladen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. “The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists.” In Women, Politics and Change, ed. by Karen Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2003. “Introduction.” Journal of Language and Politics 2(1): 1–3. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörner, Andreas. 2003. “Politische Kulturforschung.” In Politikwissenschaft. Ein Grundkurs, ed. by Herfried Münkler, 587–619. Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörner, Andreas, and Ludgera Vogt (eds). 1995. Sprache des Parlaments und Semiotik der Demokratie. Beiträge zur politischen Kommunikation in der Moderne. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Every, Danielle and Augoustinos, Martha. 2007. “Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers.” Discourse and Society 18(4): 411–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Alyssa L. Norris. 2009. “Sexism and Heterosexism.” In Handbook of Prejudice, ed. by Anton Pelinka, Karin Bischof, and Karin Stoegner, 77–118. Amherst: Cambria Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Ruth. 2011. Parliaments and Public Engagement: Innovation and Good Practice From Around the World. London: Hansard Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grad Fuchsel, H. and Martín Rojo, L. 2003. “‘Civic’ and ‘Ethnic’ nationalist discourses in Spanish parliamentary debates.” Journal of Language and Politics 2(1): 31–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung – Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansard Society (2011). Connecting Citizens to Parliament, How Parliament can engage more effectively with hard to reach groups. London: Hansard Society. [URL]
(2013). #futurenews: The Communication of Parliamentary Democracy in a Digital World. London: Hansard Society. [URL]
Henderson, Ailsa. 2007. Hierarchies of Belonging. National Identity and Political Culture in Scotland and Quebec. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihalainen, Pasi, Cornelia Ilie and Kari Palonen (eds.). 2016. Parliaments and parliamentarism: A comparative history of disputes about a European concept. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2001. “Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of confrontation.” In R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie (eds.) Language and ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive cognitive approaches, 235–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Insults as (Un)parliamentary Practice in the British and Swedish Parliaments: A Rhetorical Approach.” In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, ed. by Paul Bayley, 45–86. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Gendering confrontational rhetoric: Discursive disorder in the British and Swedish Parliaments.” Democratization 20(3): 501–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, Liliana. 2012. Parliamentary Discourses across Cultures: Interdisciplinary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerner, Ina. 2009. Differenzen und Macht: zur Anatomie von Rassismus und Sexismus. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klinger, Cornelia, Gudrun-Axeli Knapp, Birgit Sauer. 2007. Achsen der Ungleichheit. Zum Verhältnis von Klasse, Geschlecht und Ethnizität. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krastev, Ivan. 2007. “The Populist Moment.” Critique and Humanism 23(1): 103–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. The Politics of Exclusion: Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1999. “Metaphor, Morality, Politics: Or, Why Conservatives have Left Liberals in the Dust.” In Workings of Language: From Prescriptions to Perspectives, ed. by Rebecca S. Wheeler, 139–155. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina. 2012. “Studying the relationship between parliament and citizens.” Journal of Legislative Studies 18(3–4): 265–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina, and David Bender. 2013. “How deeply are parliaments engaging on social media?” Information Polity 18(4): 281–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2012. “Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual.” British Politics 7(4): 314–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lynen von Berg, Heinz. 2000. Politische Mitte und Rechtsextremismus: Diskurse zu fremdenfeindlicher Gewalt im 12. Deutschen Bundestag (1990–1994). Opladen: Springer VS. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, Stefanie, Edma Ajanovic, and Birgit Sauer. 2014. “Intersections and Inconsistencies. Framing Gender in Right-wing Populist Discourses in Austria.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 22(4): 250–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 2009. Qualities of Democracy: How to Analyze Them. Florence: Institute Italiano di Scienze.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2017. Was ist Populismus? Ein Essay. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochoa Espejo, Paulina. 2011. The Time of Popular Sovereignty: Process and the Democratic State. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari. 2016. Vote as the last speech act in parliamentary debate. Presented at ECPR General Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, September 8, 2016.
Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salzborn, Samuel. 2012. Demokratie. Theorie, Formen, Entwicklung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika, and Jehuda Reinharz. 2013. Die Sprache der Judenfeindschaft im 21 Jahrhundert, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoegner, Karin. 2014. Antisemitismus und Sexismus. Historisch-gesellschaftliche Konstellationen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taggart, Paul. 2004. “Populism and representative politics in contemporary Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9(3): 269–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theiner, Patrick, Julia Schwanholz, and Andreas Busch. 2017. Parliaments 2.0? Digital Media Use by National Parliaments in the EU. Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 1998. “Democracy and Populism.” Constellations 5(1): 110–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wengeler, Martin. 2000. “Argumentationsmuster im Bundestag. Ein diachroner Vergleich zweier Debatten zum Thema Asylrecht.” In Sprache des deutschen Parlamentarismus. Studien zu 150 Jahren parlamentarischer Kommunikation, ed. by Armin Burkhardt and Cornelia Pape, 221–240. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Michał Krzyżanowski. 2017. “Introduction: Right-wing populism in Europe and USA.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 471–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Suppression of the Nazi Past, Coded Languages, and Discourses of Silence: Applying Discourse-Historical Approach to Post-War Anti-Semitism in Austria.” In Political Languages in the Age of Extremes, ed. by Willibald Steinmetz, 351–379. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Teun A. van Dijk. 2000. Racism at the Top: Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Gagarin, S. N.
2024. Getting a handle on a Hansard with Python and NLTK, or how to tame the linguistic picture of British politics with NLP. Linguistics & Polyglot Studies 10:2 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Klepański, Jakub, Maciej Hartliński & Arkadiusz Żukowski
2023. The European migrant crisis in Polish parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 22:4 ► pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
Rubio-Carbonero, Gema & Núria Franco-Guillén
2022. When in parliamentary debate there is no debate. Journal of Language and Politics 21:4 ► pp. 544 ff. DOI logo
Truan, Naomi
2021. Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue