Article published In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 5:1 (2017) ► pp.57–80
“Reservoir of rage swamps Wall St”
The linguistic construction and evaluation of Occupy in international print media
Published online: 16 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.1.03gre
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.1.03gre
Abstract
Originating on New York’s Wall Street, the Occupy movement was “an international network of protests against social and economic inequality that began in [September] 2011 in response to the downturn of 2008” (Thorson, Kjerstin, Kevin Driscoll, Brian Ekdale, Stephanie Edgerly, Liana Gamber Thompson, Andrew Schrock, Lana Swartz, Emily K. Vraga, and Chris Wells. 2013. “Youtube, Twitter and the Occupy Movement: Connecting Content and Circulation Practices.” Information, Communication & Society 16(3): 421–51. , 427). Whilst there has been research on online activity in relation to Occupy, the scope of linguistic analysis to date has been somewhat narrow. Furthermore, the focus on new media has indirectly led to an absence of analysis of institutionally-endorsed traditional media texts. We adopt a mixed-method approach of corpus analysis and discourse analysis of national newspaper articles to answer questions such as ‘Is Occupy associated with a semantic field of violence and aggression?’ and ‘Who is represented as having agency?’ Our results indicate that, in our small corpus of media texts, Occupy and its supporters were predominantly portrayed negatively at the movement’s height; even though protesters are reported to have been peaceful in their majority, the English-speaking media we analysed still aligns them with language suggestive of aggression, conflict and even violence.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Investigating Occupy
- 3.Methodology and corpus construction
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1Overarching themes in the corpora
- 4.2Naming, describing, and metaphors
- 4.3Representing actions
- 5.Summary and conclusions
- Notes
References
References (28)
Anthony, Lawrence. 2014. AntConc 3.4.3. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available at: <[URL]> [last accessed May 2015]
Baker, Paul. 2012. “Acceptable Bias? Using Corpus Linguistics Methods with Critical Discourse Analysis”. Critical Discourse Studies 9(3):247–56.
Baker, Paul, and Erez Levon. 2015. “Picking the Right Cherries? A Comparison of Corpus-based and Qualitative Analyses of News Articles about Masculinity”. Discourse and Communication 9(2):21–36.
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery. 2005. “A Corpus-based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper texts”. Journal of Language and Politics 4(2):197–226.
Britt, Russ, and Steve Gelsi. 2011 (October 8). “Occupy Movement: A Collective Vague Effort: Everyone’s in Charge, no one’s in Charge as Demonstrations Persist.” Marketwatch. Available at <[URL]> [last accessed September 2015]
Catalano, Theresa, and John W. Creswell. 2013. “Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement: A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis.” Qualitative Inquiry 19(9):664–73.
Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2012. “Mic Check! Media Cultures and the Occupy Movement.” Social Movement Studies 11(3–4):357–85.
Fetterley, Judith. 1978. The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Gaby, Sarah, and Neal Caren. 2012. “Occupy Online: How Cute Old Men and Malcolm X Recruited 400,000 US Users to OWS on Facebook.” Social Movement Studies 11(3–4):367–74.
Ganesh, Shiv, and Cynthia Stohl. 2013. “From Wall Street to Wellington: Protests in an Era of Digital Ubiquity.” Communication Monographs 80(4):425–51.
Gibbons, James. 2013. “How the News Expresses Exclusion: A Linguistic Analysis of two Montreal Newspapers and their Coverage of the Occupy Movement.” Unpublished MA thesis, Concordia University. Available at <[URL]> [last accessed September 2015]
Gregoriou, Christiana, and Pinelopi Troullinou. 2012. “Scanning Bodies, Stripping Rights? How Do UK Media Discourses Portray Airport Security Measures?” In Constructing Crime: Discourse and Cultural Representations of Crime and ‘Deviance’, edited by Christiana Gregoriou, 19–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jeffries, Lesley, and Brian Walker. 2012. “Key Words in the Press: A Critical Corpus-driven Analysis of Ideology in the Blair Years (1998–2007).” English Text Construction 5(2):208–29.
Mayr, Andrea. 2008. Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse. London: Continuum.
McLeod, Douglas. M. 2007. “News Coverage and Social Protest: How the Media’s Protest Paradigm Exacerbates Social Conflict.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 1:185–194.
Meschenmoser, Daniel and Simon Pröll. 2012. “Using fuzzy clustering to reveal recurring spatial patterns in corpora of dialect maps.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17(2): 176–197.
Milberry, Kate. 2014. “#OccupyTech”. In Activist Science and Technology Education, edited by Larry Bencze and Steve Alsop, 25–68. New York: Springer.
Orpin, Deborah. 2005. “Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Examining the Ideology of Sleaze.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(1):37–61.
Pickerill, Jenny, and John Krinsky. 2012. “Why Does Occupy Matter?” Social Movement Studies 11(3–4):279–87.
Tabbert, Ulrike. 2012. “Crime through a Corpus: The Linguistic Construction of Offenders in the British Press.” In Constructing Crime: Discourse and Cultural Representations of Crime and ‘Deviance’, edited by Christiana Gregoriou, 130–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thorson, Kjerstin, Kevin Driscoll, Brian Ekdale, Stephanie Edgerly, Liana Gamber Thompson, Andrew Schrock, Lana Swartz, Emily K. Vraga, and Chris Wells. 2013. “Youtube, Twitter and the Occupy Movement: Connecting Content and Circulation Practices.” Information, Communication & Society 16(3): 421–51.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Chen, Fu & Guofeng Wang
2023. A topic modeling-assisted diachronic study of “One Country, Two Systems” represented in Anglo-American newspapers. Journal of Language and Politics 22:6 ► pp. 869 ff.
Mooney, Annabelle
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
