Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 4:2 (2016) ► pp.297–323

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Fuelling ethno-sectarian conflicts

(De)legitimization and impoliteness in readers’ responses in an Arab online media

 | AL-Mustansiriyah University, Iraq
Published online: 20 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.4.2.07alt
The paper investigates how (de)legitimization and impoliteness are interconnected in the ethno-sectarian conflicts that take place in online news response threads. (De)legitimization is conceptualized as a micro argumentative practice that can index the interlocutors’ sociopolitical stances and position them in relation to each other in inter-group contestations. Using multi-tiered positioning analysis, a distinction was made between exogenous and endogenous impoliteness assessments each of which occurred at a different spatiotemporal level of the interactions. This distinction elucidates how impoliteness assessments can trigger and be triggered by (de)legitimization. To understand how (de)legitimization might trigger impoliteness assessments, I differentiate between face-related and identity-related impoliteness, which were both used strategically to deepen the ethno-sectarian divisions in this online context. In the online conflicts in question, collective impoliteness was sometimes motivated by legitimization, rather than delegitimization, even though legitimization involves no violation of the genre-sanctioned interactional norms or the moral order. That was because legitimization functioned in binary oppositions, and, as such, was perceived by out-group members as provocative impingement on their ethno-sectarian communities’ sociopolitical rights.
References (48)
Al-Tahmazi, Thulfiqar. 2015. “The Pursuit of Power in Iraqi Political Discourse: Unpacking the Construction of Sociopolitical Communities on Facebook.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 10 (2): 47–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael. 1997. “Positioning between Structure and Performance.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 71: 335–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2014. “Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube”. Journal of Pragmatics, 731:19–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2010. Legitimisation in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2010. “Legitimation through Differentiation: Discursive Construction of Jacques Le Worm Chirac as an Opponent to Military Action.” In Perspective in Politics and Discourse, ed. by Urszula Okulska and Piotr Cap, 60–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Gila Shauer, Leyla Marti, Meilian Mei, and Minna Nevala. 2014. “Impoliteness and Emotions in a Crosscultural Perspective.” SPELL: Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature 301: 67–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2007. “Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: From Consensus to Contestation.” Journal of New Media and Society 9 (5): 827–847. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn, and Harré, Rom. 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuller, Graham, and Rend Rahim Francke. 2001. The Arab Shi’a: The Forgotten Muslims. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In the Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. New York: Information Science Reference. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus. 2013. “Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol .” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 97–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge and Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Gary. 2008. Digitize this Book: The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2013. “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicature. Berlin, Munich and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2007. “A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-mediated Discourse.” Language@ internet 4 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaul de Marlangeon, Silvia. 2008. “Impoliteness in Institutional and Non-institutional Contexts.” Pragmatics 18 (4): 729–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid. 2010. “Macro and Micro Legitimation in Discourse on Iran’s Nuclear Programme: The Case of Iranian National Newspaper Kayhan.” Discourse and Society 7 (1): 55–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Power and New Media: Issues and Debates.” In Why Discourse Matters: Negotiating Identity in the Mediatized World, ed. by Monika Weronika Kopytowska and Yusuf Kalyango, 287–306. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Actor Descriptions, Action Attributions, and Argumentation: Towards a Systematization of CDA Analytical Categories in the Representation of Social Groups.” Critical Discourse Studies 7 (1): 55–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lange, Patricia G. 2014. “Commenting on YouTube Rants: Perceptions of Inappropriateness or Civic Engagement?” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 53–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langlotz, Andreas, and Miriam Locher. 2012. “Ways of Communicating Emotional Stance in online Disagreements.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1591–1606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. “Discourse Across Boundaries: On Recontextualizations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse.” Text and Talk 18 (2): 43–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Derek Bousfield. 2008. “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In Impoliteness in Language, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam Locher, 1–13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markham, Annette, and the AoIR ethics Working Committee. 2012. Ethical Decision-making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0). Approved by AoIR, 12/2012. Retrieved September 13, 2013, from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun van Dijk. 1997. “‘There was a Problem and it was Solved!’ Legitimation the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Immigrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse and Society 8 (4): 523–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience”. New Media and Society 13 (1): 114–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Nathaniel, and Michael Haugh. 2015. “Agency, Accountability and Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 207–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio. 2011. “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse and Society 22 (6): 781–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruhi, Şükriye, and Hale Işık-Güler. 2007. “Conceptualizing Face and Relational Work in (Im)politeness: Revelations from Politeness Lexemes and Idioms in Turkish.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 681–711. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sellers, Mortimer. 2004. “Ideals of Public Discourse.” In Civility and its Discontents, ed. by Christine Sistare, 15–24. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sowińska, Agnieszka, and Tatiana Dubrovskaya. 2012. “Discursive Construction and Transformation of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Categories in the Newspaper Coverage on the US Anti-ballistic Missile system: Polish versus Russian View.” Discourse and Society 6 (4): 449–468.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. “(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport : Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Face, (Im)Politeness and Rapport”. In Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, 2nd ed., ed. by Helen Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svensson, Jakob. 2008. “Expressive Rationality: A Different Approach for Understanding Participation in Municipal Deliberative Practices.” Communication and Culture Critique 11: 203–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa. 2007. “Metapragmatic utterances in computer-mediated interaction.” In Metapragmatics in Use, eds. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler, 87–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2007. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse and Communication 1 (1): 91–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Altahmazi, Thulfiqar Hussein M.
2022. Impoliteness in Twitter diplomacy: offence giving and taking in Middle East diplomatic crises. Journal of Politeness Research 18:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue