Cover not available

Article published In: Dementia-compromised language conflict and aggression
Edited by Boyd Davis
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:1] 2016
► pp. 114–140

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Mechanisms of conflict and aggression in the dementia context

 | Cardiff University, UK
Published online: 11 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.4.1.05wra
It is proposed that conflict is an almost inevitable outcome, when, as in dementia communication, the delicate relationship between linguistic processing and pragmatics is upset. This relationship has been little researched, even though much is known about the two components in isolation. Making particular use of key observations and claims from the papers in this special issue, a macro-conceptualisation of the dynamics of conflict and aggression in the dementia context is developed. It is proposed that the cognitive and linguistic processing problems experienced by a person with dementia (PWD) can undermine her capacity to manage her spoken output in the way necessary to match the situational pragmatics, resulting in failure to achieve her interactional goals. The mismatch will create internal dissonance that may be expressed as aggression. Importantly, caregivers will also experience dissonance when their communicative agenda is not fulfilled. This may happen when their expectations of the situational pragmatics (e.g., old versus new information) are contradicted by the behaviour of the PWD. Here too, the dissonance may result in aggression or conflict. Modelling the mechanisms of ‘Communicative Impact’ (CI) offers a way to capture the relationship between processing and pragmatics and to examine how speakers attempt to resolve the dissonance. The CI model gives insights into how the risk of conflict in interaction between people with dementia and their caregivers might be minimised.
References (38)
Algase, Donna L., Cornelia Beck, Ann Kolanowski, Ann Whall, Stanley Berent, Kathy Richards, and Elizabeth Beattie. 1996. “Need-Driven Dementia-Compromised Behavior: An Alternative View of Disruptive Behavior.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 11 (6): 10–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biali, Susan. 2013. “How to Stop People-pleasing.” Psychology Today, [URL]. Last accessed 28.12.15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clegg, David. 2010. Tell Mrs Mills Her Husband is Still Dead. London: Trebus Project. Also available on line, at [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London/New York: John Murray/Appleton and Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, Boyd H., Margaret Maclagan, and Julie Cook. 2013. “‘Aw, So, How’s Your Day Going?’: Ways That Persons with Dementia Keep Their Conversational Partner Involved.” In Pragmatics in Dementia Discourse, edited by Boyd H. Davis, and Jacqueline Guendouzi, 83–116, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gauthier, Serge, Jeffrey Cummings, Clive Ballard, Henry Brodarty, George Grossberg, Philippe Robert, and Constantine Lyketsos. 2010. “Management of Behavioral Problems in Alzheimer’s Disease.” International Psychogeriatrics 22 (3): 346–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in Syntax and Semantics, Vol.3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 183–198. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guendouzi, Jacqueline. 2013. “‘So What’s Your Name?’ Relevance in Dementia.” In Pragmatics in Dementia Discourse, edited by Boyd H. Davis, and Jacqueline Guendouzi, 29–54, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hadas, Rachel. 2011. Strange Relation: A Memoir of Marriage, Dementia, and Poetry. Philadelphia, PA: Paul Dry Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, Mark A. 2012. “Verbal Aggression: Understanding the Psychological Antecedents and Social Consequences.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31 (1): 5–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela. 1994. “Lexical Teddy Bears and Advanced Learners: A Study into the Ways Norwegian Students Cope with Vocabulary.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4 (2): 237–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansson, Gunilla, and Charlotta Plejert. 2014. “Taking a Shower: Managing a Potentially Imposing Activity in Dementia Care.” Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 5 (1): 27–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Danielle. 2012. Family Conversations with an Alzheimer’s Sufferer: A Conversation Analytic Study. Ph.D. thesis. York, UK: University of York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lockhart, Sybil. 2009. Mother in the Middle: A Biologist’s Story of Caring for Parent and Child. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miesen, Bere M.L. 1999. Dementia in Close up. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Nicole, and Jacqueline Guendouzi. 2005. “Order and Disorder in Conversation: Encounters with Dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type.” Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 19 (5): 393–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Persson, Tove, and David Wästerfors. 2009. “‘Such Trivial Matters:’ How Staff Account for Restrictions of Residents’ Influence in Nursing Homes”. Journal of Aging Studies 231: 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahim, M. Afzalur. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational Conflict.” International Journal of Conflict Management 13 (3): 206–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rehbein, Jochen. 1987. “Multiple Formulae: Aspects of Turkish Migrant Workers’ German in Intercultural Communication.” In Analysing Intercultural Communication, edited by Karlfried Knapp, Werner Enninger, and Annelie Knapp-Potthoff, 215–248. Berlin: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. David, and Lynne Cameron. 2014. “Open Hearts or Smoke and Mirrors: Metaphorical Framing and Frame Conflicts in a Public Meeting.” Metaphor and Symbol 29 (3): 204–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabat, Steven R. 2001. The Experience of Alzheimer’s Disease: Life through a Tangled Veil. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stone, Teresa, Margaret Macmillan, and Michael Hazelton. 2010. “Swearing: Its Prevalence in Healthcare Settings and Impact on Nursing Practice. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 171: 528–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 1997. “Interactional Trouble in Emergency Service Requests: A Problem of Frames.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 30 (4): 315–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2002a. Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002b. “Formulaic Language in Computer-Supported Communication: Theory Meets Reality.” Language Awareness 111: 114–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Formulaic Language as a Barrier to Effective Communication with People with Alzheimer’s Disease.” Canadian Modern Language Review 67 (4): 429–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Patterns of Formulaic Language in Alzheimer’s Disease: Implications for Quality of Life.” Quality in Ageing and Older Adults 13 (3): 168–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Mislaying Compassion: Linguistic Triggers of Inadequate Caregiving.” In Pragmatics in Dementia Discourse, edited by Boyd H. Davis, and Jacqueline Guendouzi, 117–145. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Formulaic Language and Threat: The Problem of Empathy and Compassion in Alzheimer’s Disease Interaction.” In Dialogue and Dementia: Cognitive and Communicative Resources for Engagement, edited by Robert W. Schrauf, and Nicole Müller, 263–286. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Accommodating ‘Unaccustomed Pragmatic Spaces’ in Arbib’s Model.” Commentary on Michael Arbib “Towards a Computational Comparative Neuroprimatology: Framing the Language-ready Brain.” Physics of Life Reviews 161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. submitted. “It’s No Laughing Matter: But What Can Humour Theory Tell us about Dementia Communication?”.
Wray, Alison, and Tess Fitzpatrick. 2010. “Pushing Speakers to the Extreme: The Artificial Use of Prefabricated Material in Conversation.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 4 (1): 37–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Schatz, Sara & Grace Rose Gutiérrez
2024. Enhancing socio-communicative functions in an MCI patient with intra-nasal insulin: a case report. Frontiers in Psychiatry 15 DOI logo
Wray, Alison & Axel Bergström
2024. Determiners of social inclusion and exclusion in the dementia context. Pragmatics and Society 15:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Davis, Boyd H. & Charlene Pope
2020. Challenges in Collecting Real-World Dementia Discourse. In Learning from the Talk of Persons with Dementia, ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Morris, Lydia, Warren Mansell, Tracey Williamson, Alison Wray & Phil McEvoy
2020. Communication Empowerment Framework: An integrative framework to support effective communication and interaction between carers and people living with dementia. Dementia 19:6 ► pp. 1739 ff. DOI logo
McEvoy, Phil, Lydia Morris, Natalie Yates-Bolton & Georgina Charlesworth
2019. Living with dementia: using mentalization-based understandings to support family carers. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy 33:4 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Saunders, Pamela A.
2017. Language Socialization Among Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers. In Language Socialization, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Saunders, Pamela A.
2017. Language Socialization Among Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers. In Language Socialization, ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Wray, Alison
2017. The Language of Dementia Science and the Science of Dementia Language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Wray, Alison
2017. Formulaic Sequences as a Regulatory Mechanism for Cognitive Perturbations During the Achievement of Social Goals. Topics in Cognitive Science 9:3 ► pp. 569 ff. DOI logo
Wray, Alison
2025. Breaking down the silos: What refugee aid workers and dementia carers might teach each other. Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue