Cover not available

Article published In: Dementia-compromised language conflict and aggression
Edited by Boyd Davis
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:1] 2016
► pp. 62–89

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Opposing orientations in interactions with individuals with Frontotemporal Dementia

Blurring the boundaries between conflict and collaboration

 | Rutgers University, USA
Published online: 11 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.4.1.03mik
Clinically, frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is described as primarily affecting personality and interpersonal conduct and resulting in social behavioral disruptions, thus often giving rise to interpersonal conflict. Conflict behavior in both typical and dementia populations is frequently identified as explicit physical and verbal acts such as assault, yelling or insulting, and research often situates conflict and collaboration as opposing dimensions. The premise of this article is to examine the unfolding of moments in which individuals diagnosed with FTD and their carers demonstrate opposing orientations towards an activity in real time interaction: A home nurse needing to fulfill an institutional agenda — taking sitting blood pressure — seeks the cooperation from an individual who, in attempting to lie down, interferes with this agenda. These moments constitute sources of interactional conflict that carers attempt to resolve. However, often conflict behavior and cooperative behavior are not neatly teased apart; for instance, individuals often display conflicting orientations towards an overarching or guiding activity while cooperating in more immediate and discrete interactional tasks. These verbal/nonverbal conflicts are not large acts of aggression; rather, they may be viewed as arising within the mundane moments of life that individuals face in everyday contexts and frequently.
References (44)
Algase, Donna L., Cornelia Beck, Ann Whall, Stanley Berent, Kathy Richards, and Elizabeth Beattie. 1996. “Need-driven Dementia-compromised Behavior: An Alternative View of Disruptive Behavior.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 11(6): 10–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Miriam A. Locher. 2012. “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1549–1553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. 2005. “Context Ex Machina.” In Semantics Versus Pragmatics, edited by Zoltan Gendler Szabo, 15–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bozeat, Sasha, Carol A. Gregory, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, and John R. Hodges. 2000. “Which Neuropsychiatric and Behavioural Features Distinguish Frontal and Temporal Variants of Frontotemporal Dementia from Alzheimer’s Disease?” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 691: 178–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerejeira, Joaquim, L. Lagarto, and Elizabeta B. Mukaetova-Ladinska. 2012. “Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.” Frontiers in Neurology 3 (73): 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 2002. “Disagreements and Third Parties: Dilemmas of Neutralism in Panel News Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1385–1401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska. 1999. “Measurement of Inappropriate Behavior Associated with Dementia.” Journal of Gerontological Nursing 251: 42–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Agitated Behavior in Persons with Dementia: The Relationship between Type of Behavior, its Frequency, and its Disruptiveness.” Journal of Psychiatric Research 43 (1): 64–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska, and N. Billig. 1986. “Agitated Behaviors in the Elderly: A Conceptual Review.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 341: 711–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1545–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diehl-Schmid, Janine, Susanne Bornshein, Corina Pohl, Hans Forstl, Alexander Kurz, and Thomas Jahn. 2011. Cognitive Decline in the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia. International Psychogeriatrics 23 (2): 230–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilley, D.W., J.L. Bienias, R.S. Wilson, D.A. Bennett, T.L. Beck, and D.A. Evans. 2004. “Influence of Behavioral Symptoms on Rates of Institutionalization for Persons with Alzheimer’s Disease.” Psychological Medicine 6 (6): 1129–1135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Studies in Syntax and Semantics, vol. III: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–59. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. 2001. “Questions and Strategic Orientation in Verbal Conflict Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1815–1857. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, Mark. A. 2012. “Verbal Aggression: Understanding the Psychological Antecedents and Social Consequences.” Language and Social Psychology 31 (1): 5–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden. 2013. “The Conversation Analysis Approach to Transcription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2001. “Goffman, Garfinkel and Conversation Analysis.” In Discourse, Theory and Practice, edited by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 47–56. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1427–1446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, Nathan. 2001. “Recommendations for the Management of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia.” The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 28 (Suppl. 1): S96–S107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kangasharju, Helena. 2002. “Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1447–1471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kipps, Christopher, Jonathon A. Knibb, and John R. Hodges. 2007. “Clinical Presentations of Frontotemporal Dementia.” In Frontotemporal Dementia Syndrome, edited by John R. Hodges, 38–79. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mates, Andrea W., Lisa Mikesell, and Michael S. Smith. (eds.) 2010. Language, Interaction and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. 1988. “Language, Interaction and Social Problems.” Social Problems 35 (4): 311–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendez, Mario F., Sylvia S. Fong, Jill S. Shapira, Elvira E. Jimenez, Natalie C. Kaiser, Sarah A. Kremen, and Po-Heng Tsai. 2014. “Observation of Social behavior in Frontotemporal Dementia.” American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 29 (3): 215–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendez, Mario F., and Jill S. Shapira. 2005. “Loss of Insight and Functional Neuroimaging in Frontotemporal Dementia.” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 171: 413–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikesell, Lisa. 2009. “Conversational Practices of a Frontotemporal Dementia Patient and his Interlocutors.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 135–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010a. “Repetitional Response in Frontotemporal Dementia Discourse: Asserting Agency or Demonstrating Confusion?” Discourse Studies 12 (4): 465–500. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Examining Perseverative Behaviors of a Frontotemporal Dementia Patient and Caregiver Responses: The Benefits of Observing Ordinary Interactions and Reflections on Caregiver Stress.” In Discourse, Sociality and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind, edited by Andrea W. Mates, Lisa Mikesell, and Michael S. Smith, 85–113. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Conflicting Demonstrations of Understanding in Interactions with Individuals with Frontotemporal Dementia: Considering Cognitive Resources and their Implications for Caring and Communication.” In Dialogue and Dementia: Cognitive and Communicative Resources for Engagement, edited by Robert Schrauf, and Nicole Muller, 147–180. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
.In press. “The Use of Directives to Repair Embodied (Mis)Understandings in Interactions with Individuals Diagnosed with Frontotemporal Dementia.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (3).
Mioshi, E., S. Hsieh, S. Savage, M. Hornberger, and John R. Hodges. 2010. “Clinical Staging and Disease Progression in Frontotemporal Dementia.” Neurology 741: 1691–1597. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neary, David, Julie S. Snowden, L. Gustafson, U. Passant, D. Stuss, S. Black, M. Freedman, A. Kertesz, P.H. Robert, M. Albert, K. Boone, B.L. Miller, J. Cummings, and D.F. Benson. 1998. “Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: A Consensus on Clinical Diagnostic Criteria.” Neurology 511: 1546–1554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neary, David, Julie Snowden, and David Mann. 2005. “Frontotemporal Dementia.” The Lancet Neurology 4 (11): 771–780. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and Barbara J. Fehr. 2007. “Conversation Analysis: An Approach to the Study of Social Action as Sense Making Practices.” In Discourse as Social Interaction, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 64–91. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pondy, Louis R. 1967. “Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models.” Administrative Science Quarterly 121: 296–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, L. Linda, and Marshall S. Poole. 1987. “Conflict and Negotiation.” In Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by Frederic M. Jablin, Linda L. Putnam, Karlene Roberts, and Lyman Porter, 549–599. Newbury Park: SageGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1973. “Current Research in Conversation Analysis: The Preference for Agreement.” Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of American Summer Institute. Ann Arbor, MI.
Sarangi, Srikant K., and Stefaan Slembrouck. 1992. “Non-Cooperation in Communication: A Reassessment of Gricean Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 171: 117–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. S. 2010. “Exploring the Moral Basis of Social Action in Frontotemporal Dementia.” In Discourse, Sociality and Frontotemporal Dementia: Reverse Engineering the Social Mind, edited by Andrea W. Mates, Lisa Mikesell, and Michael S. Smith, 49–84. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second Position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (2): 131–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teri, Linda, Peter Rabins, Peter Whitehouse, Leonard Berg, Barry Reisberg, Trey Sunderland, Burr Eichelman, and Creighton Phelps. 1992. “Management of Behavior Disturbance in Alzheimer Disease: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.” Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 6 (2): 77–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Alexander J., Susanne Meares, Perminder S. Sachdev, and Henry Brodaty. 2005. “The Differentiation of Mild Frontotemporal Dementia from Alzheimer’s Disease and Health Aging by Neuropsychological Tests.” International Psychogeriatrics 171: 57–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah. 2002. “Introduction to Special Issue.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1333–1343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Huang, Lihe & Yiran Che
2023. Pragmatic impairment and multimodal compensation in older adults with dementia. Language and Health 1:1 ► pp. 44 ff. DOI logo
Mikesell, Lisa
2016. The Use of Directives to Repair Embodied (Mis)Understandings in Interactions with Individuals Diagnosed with Frontotemporal Dementia. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Mikesell, Lisa
2024. Using “Now What” to Discursively Compensate for Frontotemporal Dementia-related Challenges: A Longitudinal Case Study. In Dementia and Language, ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Dementia and Conversational Strategies. In Dementia and Language, ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue