Article published In: Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Space and Genres
Edited by Monika Kopytowska
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1] 2015
► pp. 151–172
“Threatening other” or “role-model brother”?
China in the eyes of the British and Hungarian far-right
Published online: 2 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.07szi
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.07szi
In the late 2000s far-right parties made significant gains in numerous countries of the European Union. Sharing the same agenda and discourse of discrimination, many of these parties collaborate today at the European level as well. Yet, it is unclear whether the contemporary European far-right is indeed homogenous in terms of ideology. This project in critical discourse analysis shows that the far-right in the EU is actually characterized by ideological diversity. The paper compares and contrasts how China, an emerging great power with a booming economy, has been portrayed in the early 2010s by far-right parties in the UK and Hungary. By identifying major references, metaphors, frames and argumentation schemes, the article concludes that despite belonging to the same party family, and being actual political allies, the British National Party (BNP) and the Jobbik party in Hungary construct fundamentally different images of the “Chinese Other”. The far-right in the UK, a major Western power, presents China clearly in hostile terms, mainly as a “dangerous, threatening intruder” into the British market. Additionally, in the discourse of the British far-right China is primarily identified as a communist dictatorship and used as a metaphor of oppression in the domestic UK context. Meanwhile, in Hungary, a post-communist country in Eastern Europe and a relatively recent member of the European Union, an opposite picture of China is constructed by the far-right. Here, China serves as a tool to distance Hungary from the West. China is positioned by the Hungarian far-right as a state where communism has lost its significance. By stressing the Asian origin of Hungarians, brotherhood is claimed among Hungarians and Chinese and China is presented as a “role model country” which successfully resisted “Western dominance”.
Keywords: far-right, China, ideological cleavages, Eastern and Western Europe
References (31)
AENM. 2009. “Political Declaration.” September 9. [URL] (accessed 16 February 2014).
Atton, Chris. 2006. “Far-Right Media on the Internet: Culture, Discourse and Power.” New Media & Society 81:573–587.
Barr, Michael. 2011. Who’s Afraid of China? The Challenge of Chinese Soft Power. London and New York: Zed Books.
Bársony, Fanni, Gyenge Zsuzsanna, and Ádám Kovács. 2011. “Kit érdekelnek a programok? A Jobbik kisebbségképe és annak médiareprezentációja a 2010-es országgyűlési választások kampányidőszakában” [Who Cares about Programs? Jobbik’s Image of Minorities and Its Media Representation during the 2010 Parliamentary Election Campaign]. Médiakutató, Spring. [URL] (accessed 17 February 2014).
BBC. 2010. “Profile: British National Party.” March 25. [URL] (accessed 16 February 2014).
BNP. 2013. “Youth Leadership Training — A weekend in Hungary.” October 21. [URL] (accessed 16 February 2014).
Copsey, Nigel. 2004. Contemporary British Fascism. The British National Party and the Quest for Legitimacy. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Edwards, Geraint O. 2012. “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of the Construction of ‘In-Groups’ in the 2005 and 2010 Manifestos of the British National Party.” Discourse & Society 23(3):245–258.
Fieschi, Catherine. 2000. “European Institutions: The Far-Right and Illiberal Politics in Liberal Context.” Parliamentary Affairs 53(3):517–531.
Halper, Stefan. 2010. The Beijing Consensus. How China’s Authoritarian Model will Dominate the Twenty-First Century. New York: Basic Books.
Jacques, Martin. 2009. When China Rules the World. The Rise of the Middle Kingdom and the End of the Western World. London: Allen Lane.
Kovács, András, and Anna Szilágyi. 2013. “Variations on a Theme: The Jewish ‘Other’ in Old and New Antisemitic Media Discourses in Hungary in the 1940s and 2011.’’ In Analysing Fascist Discourse, European Fascism in Talk and Text, edited by Ruth Wodak and John E. Richardson, 203–227. New York: Routledge.
Krzyzanowski, Michal, and Ruth Wodak. 2009. The Politics of Exclusion. Debating Migration in Austria. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Kynge, James. 2006. China Shakes the World. The Rise of a Hungry Nation. London and New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction, Vt.: Chelsea Green.
Langmuir, Gavin I. 1990. Toward a Definition of Antisemitism. Berkley: University of California Press.
Lee, Chin-Chuan, Joseph Man Chan, Zhongdang Pan, and Clement Y.K. So. 2002. Global Media Spectacle. News War over Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Magyar-Turán Alapítvány. n.d. “Mi a a Kurul-Táj?” [URL] (accessed 4 September 2014).
Minkenberg, Michael. 2011. “The Radical Right in Europe Today: Trends and Patterns in East and West.” In Is Europe on the “Right” Path? Right-Wing Extremism and Right-Wing Populism in Europe, edited by Nora Langenbacher and Britta Schellenberg, 37–55. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Neumann, Iver B. 1999. Uses of the Other. “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
OECD. 2012. “Looking to 2060: A Global Vision of Long-Term Growth.” OECD Economics Department Policy Note, No. 15. [URL] (accessed 16 February 2014).
Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality. Durham: Duke University Press.
Pan, Chengxin. 2004. “The ‘China Threat’ in American Self-Imagination: The Discursive Construction of Other as Power Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 29(3):305–331. [URL].
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak (eds). 2001. Discourse and Discrimination, Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.
Richardson, John E. 2011. “Race and Racial Difference: The Surface and Depth of BNP Ideology.” In British National Party — Contemporary perspectives, edited by Nigel Copsey and Graham Macklin, 38–61. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge.
. 1981. Covering Islam. How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Teed, Paul. 2011. “‘I’m no Nazi,’ says BNP Candidate Snapped at Far Right Concert.” Your Local Guardian, August 5. [URL] (accessed 16 February 2014).
Ungváry, Krisztián. 2010. “Turanism: The ‘New’ Ideology of the Far Right.” February 5. The Budapest Times. [URL] (accessed 19 February 2014).
Wilson, Robin, and Paul Hainsworth. 2012. “Far-Right Parties and Discourse in Europe: A Challenge for our Times.” Brussels: European Network against Racism.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
