Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 2:1 (2014) ► pp.1–35

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Heckling — A mimetic-interpersonal perspective

Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 21 July 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.1.01kad
The present paper aims to model the interactional operation of heckling, which has received little attention in impoliteness and interaction studies, despite the fact that studying this phenomenon has various advantages for the analyst. In order to fill this knowledge gap, I approach heckling by combining Turner’s (1982) anthropological framework with my interaction-based relational ritual theory (e.g. Kádár 2012, 2013; Kádár and Bax 2013). Following Turner, I define heckling as a ‘social drama’, which is evaluated by its watchers as ‘judges’. In accordance with my relational ritual framework I argue that heckling is a mimetic ritualistic mini-performance, which is inherently interactional as it operates in the adjacent action pair of the heckler’s performance and the public speaker/performer’s counter-performance. Adopting Turner’s terminology, heckling is a ritualistic performance of ‘anti-structure’, i.e. it upsets the regular social — and consequently interactional — structure of a setting. Successful counter-performance is a ritual of ‘structure’, which restores the normal social structure of the event, as the public speaker/performer regains control over the interaction. Through the social actions of performance and counter-performance the heckled and the heckler aim to affiliate themselves with the audience, who are ‘metaparticipants’ of the ritualistic interaction, and with the watchers/listeners in the case of video/audio-recorded interactions, who can be defined as ‘lay observers’ (cf. Kádár and Haugh 2013). Approaching heckling as a theatrical type of relational ritual helps us capture various complexities of this phenomenon, such as its relationship with certain interactional settings and metaparticipant expectations/evaluations, and its interface with related phenomena such as impoliteness.
References (73)
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2004. “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance Between Ritual and Strategy.” Sociological Theory 22(4):527–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework, and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 421:2078–2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Michael J. 1999. Argumentation and Constructive Interaction. In Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing, edited by Pierre Coirier and Jerry Andriessen, 179–202. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca. 2000. “Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts).” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10/11):1453–1469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 2010. Rituals. In Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 8: Historical Pragmatics, edited by Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 483–519. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baxter, Judith. 2002. “Competing Discourses in the Classroom: A Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis of Girls’ and Boys’ Speech in Public Contexts.” Language in Society 13(6):827–842.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, Leslie M., and Tomoko Takahashi. 1989. Sociolinguistic Variation in Face-Threatening Speech Acts. In The Dynamic Interlanguage: Empirical Studies in School Language Variation, edited by Miriam R. Eisenstein, 199–218. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, Adrian. 1981. “Interruptions and the Interpretation of Conversation.” Discourse Processes 4(2):171–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernstein, Douglas, and Peggy Wright Nash. 2005. Essentials of Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Björkman, Beyza. 2011. “Pragmatic Strategies in English as an Academic Lingua Franca: Ways of Achieving Communicative Effectiveness?” Journal of Pragmatics 43(4):950–964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bond, Peter. 2013. Off-side. Keynote talk presented at the Heckler Symposium, Nottingham, July 13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borden, R.J. 1980. Audience Influence. In Psychology of Group Influence, edited by P.B. Paulus, 91–131. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruff, Ian. 2013. The Materiality of the Body and the Viscerality of Protest. Keynote talk presented at the Heckler Symposium, Nottingham, July 13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Anita Fetzer. 2010. “Face, Facework and Political Discourse.” Revue internationale de psychologie sociale23 (2/3):155–183.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chapman, Dennis. 1948. “The Combination of Hecklers in the East of Scotland, 1822 and 1827.” The Scottish Historical Review 27(104):156–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2006. “Pragmatics of Language Performance.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Laurence L. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 365–382. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(2):349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1999. “The Emergence of Thought.” Erkenntnis 51(1):511–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Arthur A. 1958. “Speech Blocks – How to Deal with Them.” Today’s Speech 6(3):13–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiss, Own M. 1986. “Free Speech and Social Structure.” [Online] Faculty Scholarship Series. Available at: [URL], accessed on May 22, 2013.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2009. “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The ‘Culture Wars’.” Journal of Politeness Research 5(2):273–303.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. “Gesture as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica 62(1-2):29–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grush, Joseph E. 1978. “Audience can Inhibit or Facilitate Aggressive Behaviour.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4(1):119–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haberkorn, Gideon. 2009. The Muppets as a Metaphor for the Self . In Kermit Culture: Critical Perspectives in Jim Henson’s Muppets, edited by Jennifer C. Garlen and Anissa M. Graham, 25–39. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2013. “Disentangling Face, Facework and Im/Politeness.” Sociocultural Pragmatics 1(1):46–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, Mark. 1991. “Restructuring, Reconstruction, Reinscription, Rearticulation: Four Voices in Critical Interaction Theory”. Millenium 20(2):169–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. 1983. Essays in the History of Linguistic Anthropology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingram, Madelene E. 1941. “Teaching Students to Teach.” The American Journal of Nursing 41(10):1189–1192.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott. 1982. The Rhetoric of Witnessing and Heckling: A Case Study in Ethnorhetoric. PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott, and Sally Jackson. 1993. Failures in Higher Order Conditions in the Organization of Witnessing and Heckling Episodes. In Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse, edited by Frans H. van Eemeren, Scott Jacobs, and Sally Jackson, 140–169. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordan, Mel. 2011. “Heckle, Hiss, Howl and Holler.” Arts & The Public Sphere 1(2):117–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordan, Mel, and Lee Campbell. 2013. Heckler: Tactics How to Heckle, Hiss, Howl and Holler. [online] Available at: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2011. “A Graphic-Semiotic Analysis of the Chinese Multimodal Elevation and Denigration Phenomenon.” US-China Foreign Language 9(2):77–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Relational ritual. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–48. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. forthcoming. Ritual Notions in Cross-Cultural Contact: A Case Study of Heckling.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Marcel Bax. 2013. “In-Group Ritual and Relational Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 581:73–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kochman, Thomas. 1983. “The Boundary Between Play and Nonplay in Black Verbal Duelling.” Language in Society 12(3):329–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korey Lefteroff, Lindsay M. 2005. “Excessive Heckling and Violent Behaviour at Sporting Events: A Legal Solution?” University of Miami Business Law Review 1191:134–135.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 2003. “Ritual Performance and the Politics of Identity. On the Functions and Uses of Ritual.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 4(2):211–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul. 1996. “Heckling in Hyde Park: Verbal Audience Participation in Popular Discourse.” Language in Society 271:27–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikhaylova, Yevgeniya. 2011. “Does Copyright Law Sit Down on Stand-up Comedy?” St . John’s Entertainment, Arts and Sports Law Journal 1(31):41–57.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miles, Tim. 2013. ‘I’m Kirk Douglas’ Son’: A Phenomenological Model of the Role of the Heckler in Stand-up Comedy. Paper presented at the Heckler Symposium, Nottingham, July 13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 1987. “Functions of Repetition in Conversation.” Text 7(3):245–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pashler, Harold E. 1999. The Psychology of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pezzulo, Giovanni, Martin V. Butz, Olivier Sigaud, and Gianluca Baldassarre. 2009. Anticipatory Behaviour in Adaptive Learning Systems: From Psychological Theories to Artificial Cognitive System. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Planken, Brigitte. 2005. “Managing Rapport in Lingua Franca Sales Negotiations: A Comparison of Professional and Aspiring Negotiators.” English for Specific Purposes 24(4):381–400. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rao, Sameer. 2011. “Joke’s on You!”: Stand-up Comedy Performance and the Management of Hecklers. Masters thesis, [online] Available at: [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutter, Jason. 2000. “The Stand-up Introduction Sequence: Comparing Comedy Compères.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(4):463–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1999. “Discourse, Pragmatics, Conversation Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1(4):405–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language and Society 13(3):311–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silverthorne, Collin P., and Lee Mazmanian. 1975. “The Effects of Heckling and Media of Presentation on the Impact of a Persuasive Communication.” The Journal of Social Psychology 96(2):229–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Sonia. 2006. Where Do Hecklers Come From? The Origins of Booing. [online] Available at: [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J. 1999. “Genres of Discourse and the Definition of Literature.” Discourse Processes 28(2):109–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1):31–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stopfner, Maria. 2013. Streitkultur im Parlament. Linguistische Analyse der Zwischenrufe im österreichischen Nationalrat. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Templin, Charlotte. 1999. “Hillary Clinton as Threat to Gender Norms: Cartoon Images of the First Lady.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 23(1):20–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna. 2002. Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph H. 2001. Role Theory. In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan H. Turner, 233–254. New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1969. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New Brunswick and London: Transactions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ware, Dale P., and Raymond K. Tucker. 1974. “Heckling as Distraction: An Experimental Study of its Effect on Source Credibility.” Speech Monographs 41(2):185–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Linguistic Politeness Theory and Its Aftermath: Recent Research Trails. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, edited by Miriam A. Locher, and Sage Graham Lambert, 43–70. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Linda A., and Rolf O. Kroger. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis: Methods for Studying Action in Talk and Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeman, Zbynĕk. 1984. Heckling Hitler: Caricatures of the Third Reich. London: Tauris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Li, Jie & Xinren Chen
2022. The performance and relational role of toast intervention in Chinese dining contexts. Pragmatics and Society 13:4 ► pp. 625 ff. DOI logo
Orthaber, Sara
2022. Review of Kádár (2017): Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:2 ► pp. 351 ff. DOI logo
Bull, Peter, Anita Fetzer & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. Calling Mr Speaker ‘Mr Speaker’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z., Fengguang Liu & Juliane House
2020. (Im)Politeness and Chinese political discourse – An introduction. Discourse, Context & Media 35 ► pp. 100384 ff. DOI logo
Horgan, Mervyn
2019. Everyday incivility and the urban interaction order. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Sen Zhang
2019. Alignment, ‘politeness’ and implicitness in Chinese political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 698 ff. DOI logo
Kadar, Daniel Z., Puyu Ning & Yongping Ran
2018. Public ritual apology – A case study of Chinese. Discourse, Context & Media 26 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Janicki, Karol
2017. What is conflict? What is aggression? Are these challenging questions?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5:1 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Terkourafi, Marina & Dániel Z. Kádár
2017. Convention and Ritual (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Siân Robinson Davies
2016. Ritual, aggression, and participatory ambiguity. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Melvin de la Cruz
2016. Rituals of outspokenness and verbal conflict. Pragmatics and Society 7:2 ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Yongping Ran
2015. Ritual in intercultural contact: A metapragmatic case study of heckling. Journal of Pragmatics 77 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue