Article published In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Online-First Articles
A cyberterrorist behind the keyboard
An automated text analysis for psycholinguistic profiling and threat assessment
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
This article was made Open Access under a CC BY 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the authors.
Published online: 3 September 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00120.eta
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00120.eta
Abstract
Given the diverse backgrounds of people living in modern societies as well as the international nature of
cyber-terrorist threats, profiling the type of person behind cyber-mediated crimes has become a norm in terrorist profiling
practice. This study contributes to timely efficient terrorist profiling and threat assessment by showcasing an automated content
analysis of cyber-mediated terrorist texts, using natural language processing technology and AI-assisted analysis. To characterise
the terrorist type of texts and provide clues to threats, the study employs a ‘psycholinguistic profiling’ approach to authorship
analysis (Grant, Tim. 2008. “Approaching
Questions in Forensic Authorship Analysis.” In Dimensions of Forensic
Linguistics, edited by John Gibbons, and Teresa Turell, 215–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ). That is, it seeks to describe the likelihood of an author’s
engagement in violent extremist activity, identify motives for violence, and provide clues vis-a-vis would-be and actual violent
behaviours. The study takes twenty texts produced by international terrorists involved in jihadism and far-right violent extremism
as a case study. The findings reveal the investigative value of automated psycholinguistic profiling for security and intelligence
practitioners, with the semantic patterns yielding helpful information for an understanding of the criminal nature of terrorist
language. Also revealed is the attentional pattern of extremists and their discourse together with clues-based conclusions about
text type, as well as ‘warning’ behaviours and motives for aggression which vary according to the authors’ ideological
differences.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review: Cyberterrorism and linguistic focus in terrorist profiling
- 2.1Social aspects of cyberterrorism: Social cyberterrorism
- 2.2Linguistic focus in terrorist profiling
- 2.3Lexical semantic level of content analysis
- 2.4LIWC in psycholinguistic analysis: Identifying attentional patterns
- 2.5ChatGPT as a complementary analysis tool
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Data analysis procedure
- 3.2.1LIWC-based computational analysis
- 3.2.2ChatGPT and TRAP-18 based analysis
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Themes and conceptual patterns as clues to text type and likelihood of engagement in terrorism: Comparing the four sub-corpora with Smith’s (2004) reference controls
- 4.2Clues to characteristic concerns and drives across the four sub-corpora
- 4.3ChatGPT-informed themes as clues to text type and purpose of texts
- 5.Conclusion
References
References (76)
Almela, Ángela, Gema Alcaraz-Mármol, Arancha García-Pinar, and Clara Pallejá. 2019. “Developing
and Analyzing a Spanish Corpus for Forensic Purposes.” Linguistic Evidence in Security, Law and
Intelligence 31: 1–13.
Argomaniz, Javier. 2015. “European
Union Responses to Terrorist Use of the Internet.” Cooperation and
Conflict 50(2): 250–268. [URL]
Baider, Fabienne, and Maria Constantinou. 2014. “How
to Make People Feel Good when Wishing Hell: Golden Dawn and National Front Discourse, Emotions and
Argumentation.” In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and
Pragmatics, edited by Jesus Romero-Trillo, 179–210. Cham: Springer.
Baker, Paul, and Rachelle Vessey. 2018. “A
Corpus-driven Comparison of English and French Islamist Extremist Texts.” International Journal
of Corpus
Linguistics 23(3): 255–278.
Baker-Beall, Christopher, and Gareth Mott. 2022. “Understanding
the European Union’s Perception of the Threat of Cyberterrorism: A Discursive Analysis.” JCMS:
Journal of Common Market
Studies 60(4): 1086–1105.
Bandura, Albert. 2016. Moral
Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. New York: Worth Publishers.
Borum, Randy. 2003. “Understanding
the Terrorist Mindset.” FBI Law Enforcement
Bulletin, July: 72,
7. Retrieved June 29,
2022 from [URL]
Boyd, Ryan, and Andrew H. Schwartz. 2021. “Natural
Language Analysis and the Psychology of Verbal Behavior: The Past, Present, and Future States of the
Field.” Journal of Language and Social
Psychology 40(1): 21–41.
Breeze, Ruth. 2020. “Angry
Tweets: A Corpus-Assisted Study of Anger in Populist Political Discourse.” Journal of Language
Aggression and
Conflict 8(1): 118–145.
Buhrmester, Michael, Martha Newson, Alexandra Vázquez, Wallisen Hattori, and Harvey Whitehouse. 2018. “Winning
at any Cost: Identity Fusion, Group Essence, and Maximizing Ingroup Advantage.” Self and
Identity 17(5): 500–516.
Carley, Kathleen. 2020. “Social
Cybersecurity: An Emerging Science.” Computational and Mathematical Organization
Theory 26(4): 365–381. Retrieved June 29, 2023 from [URL].
Chaski, Carole. 2001. “Empirical
Evaluations of Language-based Authorship Identification Techniques.” International Journal of
Speech, Language and the
Law 8(1): 1–65.
. 2006. “The
Computational-Linguistic Approach to Forensic Authorship
Attribution.” Retrieved June 29,
2023 from [URL]
Curry, Niall, Paul Baker, and Gavin Brookes. 2024. “Generative
AI for Corpus Approaches to Discourse Studies: A Critical Evaluation of ChatGPT.” Applied
Corpus
Linguistics 4(1): 1–9.
Dean, Geoff. 2007. “Criminal
Profiling in a Terrorism Context.” In Criminal Profiling:
International Theory, Research, and Practice, edited by Richard N. Kocsis, 169–188. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press.
Dennis, Michael. 2023. “Cybercrime.” Retrieved September 7, 2023 from [URL]
Ebner, Julia. 2018. The
Rage: The Vicious Circle of Islamist and Far-Right
Extremism. London: I.B. Tauris.
Etaywe, Awni. 2022a. “Exploring
the Grammar of Othering and Antagonism as Enacted in Terrorist Discourse: Verbal Aggression in Service of
Radicalisation.” Humanities Social Science
Communication 9(177): 1–12.
. 2022b. “Language
as Evidence: A Discourse Semantic and Corpus Linguistic Approach to Examining Written Terrorist Threatening
Communication.” Doctoral Thesis, UNSW Sydney.
. 2023a. “Language
as Evidence: A Discourse Semantic and Corpus Linguistic Approach to Examining Written Terrorist Threatening
Communication.” The International Journal of Speech, Language and the
Law 29(2): 230–238.
. 2023b. “Heteroglossia
and Identifying Victims of Violence and its Purpose as Constructed in Terrorist Threatening Discourse
Online.” International Journal for the Semiotics of
Law 36(2): 907–937. [URL].
. 2023c. “The
Role of (De)Bonding in the Legitimation of Violence in Extremists’ Public Threatening
Communication.” In Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory and
Application in Global Contexts, edited by Vinh To, Thomas Amundrud, and Sally Humphrey, 12–24). University of Tasmania.
. 2024a. “Discursive
Pragmatics of Justification in Terrorist Threat Texts: Victim-Blaming, Denying, Discrediting, Legitimating, Manipulating, and
Retaliation.” Discourse &
Society 35(6): 1–31.
. 2024b. “Moral
Disaffiliation in Cyber Incitement to Hatred and Violence: A Discourse Semantic Approach.” In
the Routledge International Handbook of Online Deviance, edited
by Roderick Graham, Stephan Humer, Claire Lee, and Veronika Nagy, 419–441. London & New York: Routledge.
Etaywe, Awni, and Michele Zappavigna. 2021. “Identity,
Ideology, and Threatening Communication: An Investigation of Patterns of Attitude in Terrorist
Discourse.” Journal of Language Aggression and
Conflict 10(2): 315–350.
. 2023. “The
Role of Social Affiliation in Incitement: A Social Semiotic Approach to Far-Right Terrorists’ Incitement to
Violence.” Language in
Society 1–26.
Europol. 2023. “ChatGPT: The Impact
of Large Language Models on Law Enforcement.” Retrieved October 20, 2023 from [URL]
Fernández-Cabana, Mercedes, Julio Jiménez-Féliz, María Alves-Pérez, Raimundo Mateos, Ignacio Gómez-Reino Rodríguez, and Alejandro García-Caballero. 2015. “Linguistic
Analysis of Suicide Notes in Spain.” The European Journal of
Psychiatry 29(2): 145–155.
Gales, Tammy. 2010. “Ideologies
of Violence: A Corpus and Discourse Analytic Approach to Stance in Threatening
Communications.” Doctoral Thesis, University of California, Davis.
Garten, Justin, Brendan Kennedy, Joe Hoover, Kenji Sagae, and Morteza Dehghani. 2019. “Incorporating
Demographic Embeddings into Language Understanding.” Cognitive
Science 43(1): e12701.
Gilardi, Fabrizio, Meysam Alizadeh, and Mael Kubli. 2023. “ChatGPT
Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Tasks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 120(30): e2305016120.
Global Terrorism Index. 2020. Global
Terrorism Index: Measuring the Impact of Terrorism. Institute for Economics and Peace. Retrieved June 29,
2023 from [URL]
Grant, Tim. 2008. “Approaching
Questions in Forensic Authorship Analysis.” In Dimensions of Forensic
Linguistics, edited by John Gibbons, and Teresa Turell, 215–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Holt-Nguyen, Courtlin. 2022. “Sentiment
Analysis Showdown: ChatGPT vs. Traditional ML NLP Methods. Artificial
Corner.” Retrieved October 7,
2023 from [URL]
Jurafsky, Dan, and James Martin. 2008. Speech
and Language Processing: An Introduction to Speech Recognition, Computational Linguistics and Natural Language
Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Koppel, Moshe, Jonathan Schler, and Shlomo Argamon. 2009. “Computational
Methods in Authorship Attribution.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology 60(1): 9–26.
Kupper, Julia, and Reid Meloy. 2021. “TRAP-18
Indicators Validated through the Forensic Linguistic Analysis of Targeted Violence
Manifestos.” Journal of Threat Assessment and
Management 8(4): 174–199.
Leese, Matthias. 2014. “The
New Profiling: Algorithms, Black Boxes, and the Failure of Anti-Discriminatory Safeguards in the European
Union.” Security
Dialogue 45(5): 494–511.
Meloy, Reid, and Paul Gill. 2016. “The
Lone-Actor Terrorist and the TRAP-18.” Journal of Threat Assessment and
Management 3(1): 37–52.
Meloy, Reid J., and Jens Hoffmann. 2014. International
Handbook of Threat Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manning, Christopher, and Hinrich Schutze. 1999. Foundation
of Statistical Natural Language
Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Muschalik, Julia. 2018. Threatening
in English: A Mixed Method
Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
O’Keeffe, Anne, Brian Clancy, and Svenja Adolphs. 2011. Introducing
Pragmatics in
Use. London: Routledge.
Pennebaker, James, and Cindy Chung. 2007. “Computerized
Text Analysis of al-Qaeda Transcripts.” In A Content Analysis
Reader, edited by Klaus Krippendorff, and Mary Angela Bock, 1–16. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved June 29, 2023 from [URL]
Pennebaker, James, Roger Booth, and Martha Francis. 2007. “Linguistic
Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC [Computer software].” Austin, TX: LIWC.net.
Pennebaker, James, Roger Booth, Ryan Boyd, and Martha Francis. 2015. Linguistic
Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin: Pennebaker Conglomerates ([URL]).
Rubenstein, Richard. 2003. “The
Psycho-Political Sources of Terrorism.” In The New Global
Terrorism, edited by Charles Kegley, 139–149. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Rugala, Eugene, and James Fitzgerald. 2003. “Workplace
Violence: From Threat to Intervention.” In Clinics in Occupational
and Environmental Medicine, edited by Carole Wilkinson, and Corrinne Peek-Assa. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.
Schultheiss, Oliver. 2013. “Are
Implicit Motives Revealed in Mere Words? Testing the Marker-Word Hypothesis with Computer-Based Text
Analysis.” Front
Psychology 16(4): 748.
Shuy, Roger. 2010. “Linguistics
and Terrorism Cases.” In the Routledge Handbook of Forensic
Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard, and Alison Johnson, 558–575. London: Routledge.
. 2011. “Applied
Linguistics in the Legal Arena.” In the Handbook of Communication in
Organisations and Professions, edited by Christopher Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi 83–102). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Shuy, Roger. W. 2014. The Language of Murder Cases:
Intentionality, Predisposition, and
Voluntariness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shuy, Roger. 2021. “Terrorism
and Forensic Linguistics: Linguistics in Terrorism Cases.” In The
Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, edited by Malcolm Coulthard, May Alison, and R. Sousa-Silva, 445–462. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Smith, Allison. 2004. “From
Words to Action: Exploring the Relationship between a Group’s Value References and its Likelihood of Engaging in
Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict and
Terrorism 271: 409–437.
. 2008. “The
Implicit Motives of Terrorist Groups: How the Needs for Affiliation and Power Translate into Death and
Destruction.” Political
Psychology 29(1): 55–75. [URL]
Smith, Sharon, and Roger Shuy. 2002. “Forensic
Psycholinguistics: Using Language Analysis for Identifying and Assessing Offenders.” FBI Law
Enforcement
Bulletin 16–21. Retrieved June 29, 2023 from [URL]
Stryker, Sheldon, and Peter Burke. 2000. “The
Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory.” Social Psychology
Quarterly 63(4): 284–297.
Sykes, Mark. 1988. “From
‘Right’ to ‘Needs’: Official Discourse and the ‘Welfarization’ of
Race.” In Discourse and Discrimination, edited
by Geneva Smitherman-Donaldson, and Teun van Dijk, 176–205. Michigan: Wayne State University Press.
Tarrant, Brenton. 2019. “The
Great Replacement Manifesto.” Retrieved June 29, 2023 from [URL]
Tausczik, Yla, and James Pennebaker. 2010. “The
Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods.” Journal of
Language and Social
Psychology 29(1): 24–54.
Tsesis, Alexander. 2013. “Inflammatory
Speech: Offense versus Incitement.” Minnesota Law
Review 971: 1145–1196. Retrieved June 29, 2023 from [URL]
Turner, James, and Michael Gelles. 2003. Threat
Assessment: A Risk Management Approach. New York: Haworth Press.
U.N. Office on Drugs and
Crime. 2012. “The Use of the Internet for Terrorist
Purposes.” Retrieved September
7, 2023 from [URL]
U.S. National Institute of
Justice. 2022. “The Changing Threat Landscape of Terrorism and Violent
Extremism: Implications for Research and Policy.” Retrieved June 22, 2022 from [URL]
. 2023. “The Changing Threat Landscape of Terrorism and
Violent Extremism: Implications for Research and Policy.” U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved June 10,
2024 from [URL]
UNESCO 2023. “ChatGPT and Artificial
Intelligence in Higher Education: Quick Start
Guide.” Retrieved October 20,
2023 from [URL]
Vaisman-Tzachor, Reuben. 2006. “Psychological
Profiles of Terrorists.” Forensic
Examiner 15(2): 6–17. Retrieved September 7, 2023 from [URL]
van Dijk, Teun. 1995. “Discourse
Semantics and Ideology.” Discourse and
Society 6(2): 243–298. London: Sage.
Vološinov, Valentin. 1973. Marxism
and the Philosophy of Language. Translated by Ladislav Matejka, and I. R. Titunik. Massachusetts and London: Cambridge University Press.
Weinmann, Gabriel. 2004. “Cyberterrorism:
How Real Is the Threat?” Retrieved October 20, 2023 from [URL]
Wright-Neville, David, and Debra Smith. 2009. “Political
Rage: Terrorism and the Politics of Emotion.” Global Change, Peace &
Security 21(1): 85–98. Retrieved June 29, 2023 from [URL].
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.