Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatic perspectives on disagreement
Edited by Jennifer Schumann and Steve Oswald
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:1] 2024
► pp. 66–88

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

The evidential dimension of implicitly conveyed disagreement in political debates

ORCiD logo with link | Roma Tre University, Italy
Published online: 7 June 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00097.mas
Abstract
The idea that manipulation relies more heavily on implicit than on explicit communication has been the plank of several earlier and recent debates on argumentation and speaker roles in interactions. The present contribution will inquire into the selective nature of the use of implicit communication in political discourse; notably, analyzing the distribution of presuppositions and implicatures in two political debates, it will be argued that the use of these two implicit communicative devices – and, particularly, that of presupposition – is likely to correlate with the expression of disagreement, notably through aggressive and blasting contents, more often than with other content types. This tendency will be accounted for by considering the evidential meaning presuppositions and implicatures add to an utterance, which contributes to modulating both speaker’s commitment to truth and source identification on the part of the receiver. Data also show that, when face-threatening contents are exchanged, presuppositions epitomize by far the most preferred strategy in both debates.
Article outline
  • 1.Overview
  • 2.Presupposition, implicature and the encoding of evidentiality in discourse
    • 2.1Presupposition: A working definition
    • 2.2Implicature: A working definition
    • 2.3Evidentiality and its pragmatic dimension
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Procedure of analysis
  • 4.Results and discussion
  • 5.Observations on the retractability of presupposition and implicature
  • 6.Final remarks
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Chafe Wallace, and Joanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness and Time. The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Joanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, Nj: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh. 2014. Pragmatics and the English Language. UK: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayter, Daria. 2014. “Self-Praise in Micro-blogging.” Journal of Pragmatics 611: 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Errico, Francesca, Isabella Poggi, and Rocco Corriero. 2014. “Aggressive Language and Insults in Digital Political Participation.” International Conferences ICT 2014: 105–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting Boundaries.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18(1): 83–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis, and Steve Oswald. 2009. Argumentation et engagement du locuteur: pour un point de vue subjectiviste. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française 291: 215–243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Ash. 2016. “Stance and Identity in Twitter Hashtags.” Language@Internet 131. Available at : Stance and Identity in Twitter Hashtags – Language@Internet ([URL]).
Ferreira, Fernanda, and Nikole Patson. 2007. “The ‘Good Enough’ Approach to Language Comprehension.” Language and Linguistics Compass 1(1–2): 71–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. “Verbs of Judging. An Exercise in Semantic Description.” In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, ed. by Charles J. Fillmore, and Terence D. Langendoen, 272–289. New York: Holt-Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Viktor. 1986. “Evidentiality in the Balkans. Macedonian and Albanian.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Joanna Nichols, 168–187. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garassino, Davide, Viviana Masia, and Nicola Brocca. 2019. “Tweet as You Speak. The Role of Implicit Strategies and Pragmatic Functions in Political Communications: Data from a Diamesic Comparison.” Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 2–31: 187–208.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1975 [1989]. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 91, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J., and Diane M. Hintz. 2017. “The Evidential Category of Mutual Knowledge in Quechua.” Lingua 186–1871: 88–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodges, Adam. 2020. “Plausible Deniability”. In Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies, ed. by Janet McIntosh, and Norma Mendoza-Denton, 137–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1997. Territory of Information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Carol, and Paul Kiparsky. 1971. “Fact.” In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader, ed. by Danny D. Steinberg, and Leon A. Jakobovitz, 345–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jayeon, and Xu, Weiai. 2018. “The more Attacks, the more Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review 44(2): 201–213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo. 2009. La struttura informativa. Forma e funzione negli enunciati linguistici. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. La lingua disonesta. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Manipulative Shallow Processing Induced by Presuppositions and Topics. Theoretical Perspectives and Experimental Evidence.” Frontiers in Communication, available at: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo, and Viviana Masia. 2014. “Implicitness Impact: Measuring Texts.” Journal of Pragmatics 611: 161–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masia, Viviana. 2017. Sociobiological Bases of Information Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Presupposition, Assertion and the Encoding of Evidentiality in Political Discourse.” Linguistik Online 102(2): 129–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2014. “A Truth that’s Told with Bad Intent: Lying and Implicit Content.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 28(1): 79–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2015. “Subjectivity Between Discourse and Conceptualization.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 106–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Récanati, François. 1987. Meaning and Force. The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2007. Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari, Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay on the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1973. “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 21: 447–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1974. “Pragmatic Presuppositions.” In Semantics and Philosophy, ed. by Munitz K. Milton, and Peter Unger, 471–482. New York: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuan, Shupei, and Lu Hang. 2020. “It’s Global Warming, Stupid: Aggressive Communication Styles and Political Ideology in Science Blog Debates about Climate Change.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 97(4): 1003–1025. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue