Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 12:2 (2024) ► pp.263–288

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A multimodal analysis of (de)legitimation through argumentation in extremist discourse: The case of Dabiq

ORCiD logo with link | Universiti Malaya
ORCiD logo with link | Universiti Malaya
ORCiD logo with link | The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand
Published online: 11 December 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00089.ras
Abstract
Even after the demise of its territorial caliphate in 2019, ISIS persists as a potent threat, adapting to new technologies and maintaining its status as an active insurgency. Amidst the backdrop of the terror group’s demonstrated resilience, this paper examines its practice of (de)legitimation and language of persuasion through a multimodal argumentation analysis. It combines the argumentation strategies (topoi) proposed by Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) and tools from Social Semiotics with argumentation theories, achieved through a comprehensive enthymematic deconstruction of arguments in ISIS’s e-magazine, Dabiq. The findings reveal four interrelated sets of plausibly inferable premises, namely, advantage and disadvantage; threat and obligation; negative consequence and history; and authority and Shariah law. These premises fall within broad social, political, historical, and religious categories and are deliberately crafted to lend support to ISIS’s desired conclusions, aimed at systematically altering the addressees’ state of knowledge and eventually eliciting acceptance from the intended public.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The persuasiveness of ISIS
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Argumentation scheme and DHA
    • 3.2Visual argumentation
  • 4.Findings and discussion
    • 4.1Topoi of advantage and disadvantage
    • 4.2Topoi of threat and obligation
    • 4.3Topoi of negative consequence and history
    • 4.4Topoi of authority and Shariah law
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Data
  • Disclosure statement
  • References
References (39)
References
Al-Dayel, Nadia, Andrew Mumford, and Kevin Bales. 2022. “Not Yet Dead: The Establishment and Regulation of Slavery by the Islamic State.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 45 (11): 929–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ali, Mah-Rukh. 2015. “ISIS and Propaganda: How ISIS Exploits Women.” Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism 10 (11). [URL]
Bates, David. 2023. “‘The jobs all go to foreigners’: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Labour Party’s ‘Left-Wing’ Case for Immigration Controls.” Critical Discourse Studies 20 (2): 183–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolechów, Bartosz. 2022. “The Islamic State’s Worldview as a Radical Terror Management Device.” Studia Politologiczne 631: 61–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boukala, Salomi. 2016. “Rethinking Topos in the Discourse Historical Approach: Endoxon Seeking and Argumentation in Greek Media Discourses on ‘Islamist Terrorism’.” Discourse Studies 18 (3): 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braet, A. C. 2005. “The Common Topic in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Precursor of the Argumentation Scheme.” Argumentation 19 (1): 65–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frissen, Thomas, and Leen d’Haenens. 2017. “Legitimizing the Caliphate and its Politics: Moral Disengagement Rhetoric in Dabiq.” In Authoritarian and Populist Influences in the New Media, edited by Sai Felicia Krishna-Hensel, 138–164. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galloway, Chris. 2016. “Media Jihad: What PR can Learn in Islamic State’s Public Relations Masterclass.” Public Relations Review 42 (4): 582–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Jean. 1998. “Forms of Authority and the Real Ad Verecundiam.” Argumentation 121: 267–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihnen, Constanza, and John E. Richardson. 2011. “On Combining Pragma-Dialectics with Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, edited by Eveline T. Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, 231–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingram, Haroro J. 2016. “An Analysis of Islamic State’s Dabiq Magazine.” Australian Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 458–477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. “Learning from ISIS’s Virtual Propaganda War for Western Muslims: A Comparison of Inspire and Dabiq. IOS Press.” [URL]
Jacoby, Tim. 2019. “Islam and the Islamic State’s Magazine, Dabiq.” Politics and Religion 12 (1): 32–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 1 edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2 edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 3 edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kugle, Scott Siraj al-Haqq. 2010. Homosexuality in Islam: Critical Reflection on Gay, Lesbian, and Transgender Muslims. Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, Brian K., and Jean Goodwin. 2022. “Extreme Arguments: Anwar al-Awlaki’s Radicalizing Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 2001: 39–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Luke Walker, and Anina Kinzel. 2017. “The Role of Discourse Analysis in Terrorism Studies: Comparing Inspire and Dabiq.” In Terrorists’ Use of the Internet, edited by Maura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald, and Lella Nouri, 158–169. IOS Press Ebooks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macdonald, Stuart, Sara Giro Correia, and Amy-Louise Watkin. 2019. “Regulating Terrorist Content on Social Media: Automation and the Rule of Law.” International Journal of Law in Context 15 (2): 183–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McMinimy, Kayla, Carol K. Winkler, Ayse Deniz Lokmanoglu, and Monerah Almahmoud. 2021. “Censoring Extremism: Influence of Online Restriction on Official Media Products of ISIS.” Terrorism and Political Violence 35 (4): 971–987. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagata, Michael, Ali Abbas, Scott Atran, Bill Braniff, Andrew Bringuel, Muayyad al-Chalabi, Sarah Canna, and Jocelyne Cesari. 2014. “Preface.” In Multi-method Assessment of ISIL, edited by Hriar Cabayan, and Sarah Canna. [URL].
Rasoulikolamaki, Sahar, and Surinderpal Kaur. 2021. “How ISIS Represented Enemies as Ineffectual in Dabiq: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Communication 15 (6): 650–671. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. “The Representational Strategies of Lionization and Victimization in ISIS’s Online Magazine, Dabiq.” Terrorism and Political Violence 35 (5): 1161–1180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Alex P. 2015. “Challenging the Narrative of the ‘Islamic State’.” The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism 51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spier, Troy E. 2018. “Extremist Propaganda and Qur’anic Scripture: A ‘Radical’ Corpus-Based Study of the Dabiq.” Discourse & Society 29 (5): 553–567. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strnad, Vladislav, and Nik Hynek. 2020. “ISIS’s Hybrid Identity: A Triangulated Analysis of the Dabiq Narrative.” Defence Studies 20 (1): 82–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Clarion Project. 2014. Accessed May, 2016. [URL]
van der Krogt, Christopher J. 2022. “Incitement: Anwar al-Awlaki’s Western Jihad.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 33 (3): 326–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas Neil. 1997. Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments From Authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wozniak, Jesse, Joshua Woods, and Quentin King. 2018. “Chaos and Civilization: The Organizational Impression Management of the Islamic State in Dabiq Magazine.” Social Science Quarterly. [URL]
Žagar, Igor. 2010. “Topoi in Critical Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (1): 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappettini, Franco. 2019. “The Brexit Referendum: How Trade and Immigration in the Discourses of the Official Campaigns Have Legitimised a Toxic (Inter)national Logic.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4): 403–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Xia, Chenri, Sahar Rasoulikolamaki & Ali Jalalian Daghigh
2025. A critical enthymematic deconstruction of anti/pro LGBTQ+ arguments on Malaysian social media. Discourse & Society 36:5 ► pp. 743 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue