Cover not available

Article published In: Young researchers in action
Edited by Angeliki Tzanne
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1] 2022
► pp. 169–196

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

‘Slut I hate you’

A critical discourse analysis of gendered conflict on YouTube

 | King’s College London
 | Lancaster University
Published online: 4 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00065.sag
Abstract
Adopting a Critical Discourse Analysis perspective, this paper seeks to explore the conflict emerging from the ways YouTube users index, reaffirm or challenge gender ideologies by examining 2,304 YouTube comments posted in response to the misogynistic Greek pop song Καριόλα σε μισώ ‘Slut I hate you’. Our textual analysis draws on the Discourse-Historical Approach, focusing on the lexicogrammatical choices and discursive strategies employed for the positive presentation of the self and the negative presentation of the other. Our findings suggest that: (a) there is a dialectic relationship between the gendered representations of the videoclip and the gender ideologies indexed by individual YouTube users; (b) the discursive negotiation of gender ideologies in anonymous, asynchronous and polylogal discussions is a highly polarised and antagonistic discourse activity, with most comments under the videoclip of the song falling under two broad categories, i.e. those sustaining and those challenging gendered aggression and patriarchal discourses; (c) although both groups resort to common discursive strategies (e.g. nomination and predication strategies that legitimise the authority of the in-group and delegitimise the out-group), they differ significantly in their argumentation and intensification/mitigation strategies, which allows commenters to take sides in a polarised debate and index their gender ideologies; (d) due to the pervasive power of dominant ideologies across all levels of context, the democratic and subversive potential of conflict on YouTube is limited but not pointless as counter-discourses may still gain visibility.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Online aggression and conflict: Previous studies and theoretical framework
    • 2.1Theoretical background
    • 2.2Macro-level context: Online misogyny, violence against women and patriarchy
    • 2.3Meso-level context: Features of digitally mediated communication on YouTube
      • 2.3.1Conflict and aggression on YouTube
      • 2.3.2Gender inequalities and violence against women on YouTube
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data -The triggering song: A chronicle
    • 3.2Analytical procedure
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Sustaining patriarchal discourses (SPD)
    • 5.2Challenging patriarchal discourses (CPD)
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (37)
References
Bou-Franch, Patricia. 2014. “An Introduction to Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 177–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014a. “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731:19–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression Against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 226–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colliver, Ben, and Adrian Coyle. 2020. “‘Risk of Sexual Violence against Women and Girls’ in the Construction of ‘Gender-neutral Toilets’: A Discourse Analysis of Comments on YouTube Videos.” Journal of Gender-Based Violence. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drosos, Nikos, and Alexander-Stamatios Antoniou. 2019. “Attitudes toward Women Managers and Female Authority: An Empirical Study among Women Managers in Greece.” In Women, Business and Leadership, Gender and Organisations: New Horizons in Management series, edited by Alexander-Stamatios Antoniou, Cary Cooper and Caroline Gatrell, 362–378. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
European Institute for Gender Equality. 2017. “Cyber Violence Against Women and Girls.” Accessed July 3, 2020. [URL]
. 2019. “Gender Equality Index.” Accessed July 25, 2019. [URL]
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 3 (2): 193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Peter, and Tobias Greitemeyer. 2006. “Music and Aggression: The Impact of Sexual-Aggressive Song Lyrics on Aggression-Related Thoughts, Emotions, and Behavior toward the Same and the Opposite Sex.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (9): 1165–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In The Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey: Information Science Reference. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifianou. 2019. “Im/politeness and Discursive Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics 1451: 91–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ging, Debbie, and Eugenia Siapera. 2018. “Special Issue on Online Misogyny.” Feminist Media Studies, 18 (4):515–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark Mcglashan. 2016. “'Real Men Don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 80–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jane, Emma Alice. 2014. “‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Continuum 28 (4): 558–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jurasz, Olga, and Kim Barker. 2019. “Online Misogyny: A Challenge for Digital Feminism?” Journal of International Affairs 72 (2): 95–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosyfologou, Aliki. 2018. “Gendered Aspects of the Austerity Regime in Greece: 2010–2017: Austerity, Gender Inequality and Feminism after the Crisis in Greece.” ROSA-LUXEMBURG-STIFTUNG, Accessed October, 10, 2019. [URL]
Kourniakti, Jessica. 2017. “From Fascist Overload to Unbearable Lightness: Recollections of the Military Junta as Kitsch in Postdictatorial Greece.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies 35 (2): 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lange, Patricia G. 2006. “What is your Claim to Flame?” First Monday, 111: n. pag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Eun-Ju. 2007. “Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Group Identification, Public-Self-Awareness, and Perceived Argument Quality.” Journal of Communication 57 (2): 385–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2011. “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2578–2593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milliken, Mary, Kerri Gibson, Susan O’Donnell, and Janice Singer. 2017. “User-generated Online Video and the Atlantic Canadian Public Sphere: A YouTube Study.” Proceedings of the International Communications Association (ICA 2008), Montreal, Canada, May 22–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molyneaux, Heather, Susan O’Donnell, Kerri Gibson, and Janice Singer. 2008. “Exploring the Gender Divide on YouTube: An Analysis of the Creation and Reception of Vlogs.” The American Communication Journal 10 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murthy, Dhiraj, and Sanjay Sharma. 2018. “Visualizing YouTube’s Comment Space: Online Hostility as a Networked Phenomena.” New Media & Society 21 (1): 191–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2009. “The Virtual Sphere 2.0: The Internet, the Public Sphere and beyond.” In The Handbook of Internet Politics, edited by Andrew Chadwick and Philip Howard, 230–245. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric, and Rebecca Densley. 2017. “Girl in a Country Song: Gender Roles and Objectification of Women in Popular Country Music across 1990 to 2014.” Sex Roles 76(3–4): 188–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson-Self, Louise. 2018. “Woman-Hating: On Misogyny, Sexism, and Hate Speech.” Hypatia 33 (2): 256–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reicher, Steve, Russell Spears, and Tom Postmes. 1995. “A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology 61: 161–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rotman, Dana, Jennifer Golbeck, and Jennifer Preece. 2009. “The Community Is Where the Rapport Is – on Sense and Structure in the Youtube Community.” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 41–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thelwall, Mike, and Amalia Mas-Bleda. 2018. “YouTube Science Channel Video Presenters and Comments: Female Friendly or Vestiges of Sexism?” Aslib Journal of Information Management 70 (1): 28–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Zoonen, Liesbet, Farida Vis, and Sabina Mihelj. 2011. “YouTube Interactions between Agonism, Antagonism and Dialogue: Video Responses to the Anti-Islam Film Fitna.” New Media & Society 13 (8): 1283–1300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald, and Charis E. Kubrin. 2009. “Misogyny in Rap Music: A Content Analysis of Prevalence and Meanings.” Men and Masculinities 12 (1): 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, South African Medical Research Council. 2013. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization. [URL]
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Elizabeth, Laura
2025. Overall Misinformation on Intimate Partner Violence on Social Media Platforms. In The Practitioner’s & Professional’s Guide to Intimate Partner Violence Advocacy in the Digital Age, ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Fichman, Pnina & Gordon Amidu
2025. Political Gendertrolling. Social Science Computer Review DOI logo
Kantichol, Kritsada & Siriporn Tansuwan
2025. Power negotiation of depressed patients in narrative literature: analyzing the depressive language through critical discourse analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities 12:1 DOI logo
Krykoniuk, Kateryna, Cleo Hopkin-King & Seán G. Roberts
2025. Developing a discourse space for analysing online discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 67 ► pp. 100929 ff. DOI logo
Sagredos, Christos & Evelin Nikolova
2025. Discourses of discrimination against sex workers. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Brown, Lucien
2024. “The denigration of Korean men’s genitals”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Deng, Yue, Zheng Chen, Changyang He, Zhicong Lu & Bo Li
2024. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kalabikhina, Irina, Natalia Loukachevitch, Eugeny Banin & Anton Kolotusha
2024. Text as Data in Demography: Russian-language experience. In Population and Development in the 21st Century - Between the Anthropocene and Anthropocentrism, DOI logo
Kalabikhina, Irina, Ekaterina Zubova, Natalia Loukachevitch, Anthony Kolotusha, Zarina Kazbekova, Evgeny Banin & German Klimenko
2023. Identifying Reproductive Behavior Arguments in Social Media Content Users’ Opinions through Natural Language Processing Techniques. Population and Economics 7:2 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Delis, Panagiotis
2022. Impoliteness in hip-hop music. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Khatua, Aparup & Wolfgang Nejdl
2022. Open Challenges in Online Social Networks, ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Komalova, Liliya Ryashitovna & Lyubov Viktorovna Kalyuzhnaya
2022. Broadening the ontology of threats verbalized in written communication on the Internet. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26:3 ► pp. 779 ff. DOI logo
Šori, Iztok & Vasja Vehovar
2022. Reported User-Generated Online Hate Speech: The ‘Ecosystem’, Frames, and Ideologies. Social Sciences 11:8 ► pp. 375 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue