Cover not available

Article published In: Young researchers in action
Edited by Angeliki Tzanne
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1] 2022
► pp. 13–37

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

“Congratulations! You just won the title for ‘worse Tinder opening line’”

Inappropriate behaviour and impoliteness in online dating

 | National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Published online: 25 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00063.kav
Abstract
Often preferred to its face-to-face counterpart, online dating has transformed the way we perceive practices relevant to meeting people, mostly because it offers “a wider pool of potential partners” (Heino, Rebecca D., Nicole B. Ellison, and Jennifer L. Gibbs. 2010. “Relationshopping: Investigating the Market Metaphor in Online Dating.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27 (4): 427–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, 428). Despite its popularity, however, online dating is an under-researched area in general, crucially in linguistics. Looking at (mostly unsuccessful) naturally occurring initial interactions that have taken place on the popular Tinder application, the aim of this study is to gain some insights into the relationship among language aggression, impoliteness and communication failure in the context of flirting on Tinder. Results show that the most common way that users initiate interaction in this dataset is through sexually loaded language, which seems to be understood as a breach of the norms of appropriateness for first-time contact. Although Tinder has no manual to prescribe what should or should not be said in interaction, it transpires from the data that avoiding overstepping in terms of sexual matters (i.e. refraining from using sexually loaded language and/or innuendos) functions as an unwritten law which sparks impoliteness when not followed. Resulting impoliteness manifests itself mostly through the strategies of sarcasm and ignoring/snubbing the other, used to counteract (perceived) inappropriateness. Tracing this escalation of non-cooperative practices, from inappropriateness to impoliteness, also provides the opportunity to examine the emergence of playfulness and creativity as language behaviours interwoven with aggression. Therefore, online dating seems to lend itself well to the study of impoliteness and violation of norms of appropriate behaviour, providing opportunities for an expansion of contexts for linguistic analysis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Online dating and Tinder
    • 2.2Impoliteness in recent theorising
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Aggression on the part of the speaker: ‘Nightmarish’ pick-up lines
    • 4.2Aggression on the part of the hearer: Negative evaluations and impoliteness
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (67)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2011. “Language Change and Digital Media : A Review of Conceptions and Evidence.” In Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe, edited by Nikolas Coupland and Tore Kristiansen, 145–161. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayraktaroǧlu, Arın, and Maria Sifianou. 2012. “The Iron Fist in a Velvet Glove: How Politeness Can Contribute to Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 8 (2): 143–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, Kirsty, and Sharon Delmege. 2012. “The Filtered Encounter: Online Dating and the Problem of Filtering through Excessive Information.” Social Semiotics 22 (3): 237–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bor, Stephanie, and Jan Boehmer. 2002. “The Internet.” In Communication Technology Update and Fundamentals, edited by August E. Grant and Jennifer H. Meadows, 275–282. Boston: Focal Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés Conejos Blitvich. 2012. “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (4): 501–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. “Impoliteness in the Struggle for Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 127–153. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, edited by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 101–134. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chayko, Mary. 2008. Portable Communities: The Social Dynamics of Online and Mobile Connectedness. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25 (3): 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 35–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 17–44. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10–11): 1545–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
del-Teso-Craviotto, Marisol. 2006. “Language and Sexuality in Spanish and English Dating Chats.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (4): 460–480. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2015. “The Landscape of Impoliteness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 329–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellison, Nicole B., Rebecca Heino, and Jennifer Gibbs. 2006. “Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2): 415–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiore, Andrew T., Lindsay, Shaw T., Xiaomeng Zhong, G. A. Mendelsohn, and Coye Cheshire. 2010. “Who’s Right and Who Writes: People, Profiles, Contacts, and Replies in Online Dating.” In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–10. Los Alamitos, CA: Computer Society Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. “Perspectives on Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 219–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Introduction: Face, Identity and Im/Politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 120–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gatter, Karoline, and Kathleen Hodkinson. 2016. “On the Differences between TinderTM versus Online Dating Agencies: Questioning a Myth. An Exploratory Study.” Cogent Psychology 3 (1): 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gershon, Ilana. 2010. “Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Media Switching and Media Ideologies.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20 (2): 389–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Jennifer L., Nicole B. Ellison, and Chih-Hui Lai. 2011. “First Comes Love, Then Comes Google: An Investigation of Uncertainty Reduction Strategies and Self-Disclosure in Online Dating.” Communication Research 38 (1): 70–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L. 2007. “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict, (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-Mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 742–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “A Manual for (Im)Politeness?: The Impact of the FAQ in an Electronic Community of Practice.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker. 2017. “(Im)politeness in Digital Communication.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grainger, Karen. 2011. “‘First Order’ and ‘Second Order’ Politeness: Institutional and Intercultural Contexts.” In Discursive Approaches to Politeness, edited by LPRG, 167–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Jeffrey A., Steve Carter, Michael J. Cody, and Julie M. Albright. 2010. “Individual Differences in the Communication of Romantic Interest: Development of the Flirting Styles Inventory.” Communication Quarterly 58 (4): 365–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire. 2010. “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (2): 215–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasinoff, Amy Adele. 2013. “Sexting as Media Production: Rethinking Social Media and Sexuality.” New Media and Society 15 (4): 449–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasinoff, Amy Adele, and Tamara Shepherd. 2014. “Sexting in Context: Privacy Norms and Expectations.” International Journal of Communication 8 (1): 2932–2955. [URL]
Haugh, Michael. 2010. “When Is an Email Really Offensive?: Argumentativity and Variability in Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (1): 7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Im/Politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 52–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Impoliteness and Taking Offence in Initial Interactions.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 36–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “‘Just Kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-Serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 951: 120–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Donal Carbaugh. 2015. “Self-Disclosure in Initial Interactions amongst Speakers of American and Australian English.” Multilingua 34 (4): 461–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Danielle Pillet-Shore. 2018. “Getting to Know You: Teasing as an Invitation to Intimacy in Initial Interactions.” Discourse Studies 20 (2): 246–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Sara Mills. 2013. “Interpersonal Pragmatics: Issues and Debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 581: 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heino, Rebecca D., Nicole B. Ellison, and Jennifer L. Gibbs. 2010. “Relationshopping: Investigating the Market Metaphor in Online Dating.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 27 (4): 427–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Kirk Job-Sluder, Rebecca Scheckler, and Sasha Barab. 2002. Searching for Safety Online: Managing “Trolling” in a Feminist Forum. The Information Society 18 (5): 371–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F. 2011. “The Interactional Construction of Desire as Gender.” Gender and Language 5 (2): 211–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Flirting and ‘Normative’ Sexualities.” Journal of Language and Sexuality 2 (1): 101–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lea, Martin, Russell Spears, and Daphne de Groot. 2001. “Knowing Me, Knowing You: Anonymity Effects on Social Identity Processes within Groups.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 (5): 526–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LPRG – Linguistic Politeness Research Group. 2011. “Introduction: The Linguistic Politeness Research Group”. In Discursive Approaches to Politeness, edited by LPRG, 1–17. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Derek Bousfield. 2008. “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2008. “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2011. “On-Line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2578–2593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDaniel, Anita K. 2005. “Young Women’s Dating Behavior: Why/Why Not Date a Nice Guy?” Sex Roles 53 (5–6): 347–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mortensen, Kristine Køhler. 2015. “Informed Consent in the Field of Language and Sexuality: The Case of Online Dating Research.” Journal of Language and Sexuality 4 (1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Flirting in Online Dating: Giving Empirical Grounds to Flirtatious Implicitness.” Discourse Studies 19 (5): 581–597. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murnen, Sarah K. 2000. “Gender and the Use of Sexually Degrading Language.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 24 (4): 319–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2019. “Im/Politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives : An Overview of the Field.” In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, edited by Eva Ogiermann and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pillet-Shore, Danielle. 2011. “Doing Introductions: The Work Involved in Meeting Someone New.” Communication Monographs 78 (1): 73–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reed, Lauren A., Richard M. Tolman, and L. Monique Ward. 2016. “Snooping and Sexting: Digital Media as a Context for Dating Aggression and Abuse Among College Students.” Violence Against Women 22 (13): 1556–1576. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. 1988. Small Talk: Analyzing Phatic Discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surra, Catherine A., and Jill M. Boelter. 2013. “Dating and Mate Selection.” In Handbook of Marriage and the Family, edited by Gary W. Peterson and Kevin R. Bush, 211–32. US: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surra, Catherine A., Christine R. Gray, Tyfany M. J. Boettcher, Nathan R. Cottle, and Adam R. West. 2006. “From Courtship to Universal Properties: Research on Dating and Mate Selection, 1950 to 2003.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, edited by Anita L. Vangelisti and Daniel Perlman, 113–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2008. “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 45–74. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Tammara Combs, Marc A. Smith, Danyel Fisher, and Howard T. Welser. 2005. Picturing Usenet: Mapping Computer-Mediated Collective Action. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyson, Gareth, Vasile C. Perta, Hamed Haddadi, and Michael C. Seto. 2016. “A First Look at User Activity on Tinder.” In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 461–466. IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, Janelle. 2017. “What Are You Doing on Tinder? Impression Management on a Matchmaking Mobile App.” Information Communication and Society 20 (11): 1644–1659. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Andersen, Elisabeth Muth
2025. “So fast on the keys, when do you have time to meet”: Interactionally generated invitations in Danish Tinder chats. Discourse, Context & Media 64 ► pp. 100849 ff. DOI logo
O'Brien, Catherine R K, Nuur Alifah Roslan, Steven J. Murdoch, Ruba Abu-Salma, Douglas Zytko & Mark Warner
2025. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Van der Zanden, Tess & Alexander Peter Schouten
2024. Creativity, Expectancy Violations, and Impression Formation: Effects of Novelty and Appropriateness in Online Dating Profile Texts. Media Psychology 27:6 ► pp. 842 ff. DOI logo
Schokkenbroek, Janneke M., Koen Ponnet & Wim Hardyns
2023. Technology-Facilitated Harm and Abuse in Intimate Relationships. In Encyclopedia of Domestic Violence, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
van der Zanden, Tess, Alexander P. Schouten, Maria B. J. Mos, Emiel J. Krahmer & Andrea Fronzetti Colladon
2022. Originality in online dating profile texts: How does perceived originality affect impression formation and what makes a text original?. PLOS ONE 17:10 ► pp. e0274860 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue