Cover not available

Article published In: Critical perspectives on gender, politics and violence
Edited by Eleonora Esposito
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:1] 2021
► pp. 127–154

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Twitter and abortion

Online hate against pro-choice female politicians in Chile

ORCiD logo with link | Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile
ORCiD logo with link | Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC), Spain
Published online: 4 March 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00056.per
Abstract
This paper explores the misogynistic abuse against female Chilean politicians who openly supported a pro-choice bill that allowed the access to abortion in limited circumstances. We analysed the verbal abuse targeted at these politicians during the legislation of the abortion bill (2015–2017) and the linguistic and discursive patterns of online abuse. To that end, we collected tweets from this legislation period and created a subset with specific milestones of the parliamentary debate. Further, we undertook a corpus-assisted analysis of the data, focusing on collocations and keywords, which were then analysed in the light of van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar framework on the representation of social actors and legitimation strategies. Results evidence that violence against women in power can take forms other than the explicit sexual, physical, and psychological threats that are commonly identified. Violence targets these women as it is claimed that they are unsuitable to legislate for allegedly having tolerated and protected crime. Therefore, the corrective function of abuse takes the form of legal actions against their crimes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Abortion and violence against women
  • 3.Gendered hate and harassment online
  • 4.Data and methodology
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Collocations
  • 7.Keywords
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (63)
References
Alam, Zainab. 2021. “Violence against Women in Politics: The Case of Pakistani Women’s Activism.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alvares, Claudia. 2018. “Online Staging of Femininity: Disciplining through Public Exposure in Brazilian Social Media.” Feminist Media Studies 18 (4): 657–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2019. “Abortion Laws in the US – 10 Things You Need to Know.” August 31, 2019. [URL]
Anderson, Kristin. L., and Jill Cermele. 2014. “Public/Private Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2 (2): 274–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. AntConc (version 3.5.8). Windows. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. 2019.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2004. “Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency, and Sense in Keywords Analysis.” Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4): 346–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery. 2005. “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics 4 (2): 197–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michael Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak. 2008. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19 (3): 273–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1986. “On Pedagogic Discourse.” In Handbook for Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education, ed. by John Richardson, 205–290. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blofield, Merike. 2006. The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borchorst, Anette. 1994. “Welfare State Regimes, Women’s Interests and the EC.” In Gendering Welfare States, ed. by Diane Sainsbury, 26–44. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caneva, Hernán A. 2019. “Disputas por el Aborto en Argentina: Análisis Crítico de Discursos en Dos Organizaciones (2014–2016).” Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional de La Plata.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Centre for Reproductive Rights. 2019. “The World’s Abortion Laws.” Accessed August 30, 2019. [URL]
Cohen, Stanley. 2011. Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone. 2017. El Segundo Sexo (15th ed.). Buenos Aires: Debolsillo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drange, Eli-Marie D. 2019. “No me banco la gente así. Un estudio comparativo del uso de palabras coloquiales y malsonantes en conversaciones informales en tres comunidades de habla hispanohablantes (‘I don’t like people like that.’ A comparative study of the use of colloquial and coarse language in informal conversations in three Spanish-speaking communities).” Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 10 (1): 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drange, Eli-Marie D., Ingrid Kristine Hasund, and Anna-Brita Stenström. 2014. “‘Your mum!’ Teenagers’ Swearing by Mother in English, Spanish and Norwegian.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19 (1): 29–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
El Desconcierto. 2016. “Informe de DD.HH. alerta que médicos chilenos dificultan la esterilización voluntaria de mujeres (Human Rights report warn Chilean doctors hinder voluntary sterilization for women).” El Desconcierto, November 7, 2016. [URL]
Esposito, Eleonora. 2021. “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fagetti, Antonella. 1986. “La moral cristiana y el aborto (Christian morality and abortion).” MA diss., Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, Michael. 1977. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gómez Molina, José Ramón. 2003. “El insulto: una aproximación sociolingüística (Insults: A Sociolinguistic Approach).” In Lengua, variación y contexto: estudios dedicados a Humberto López Morales, ed. by Francisco Moreno Fernández, 639–653. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, Mounia Lalmas, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2016. “Encouraging Diversity- and Representation-Awareness in Geographically Centralized Content.” In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM New York, March 2016, 7–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Mounia Lalmas. 2020. “Every Colour you are: Stance Prediction and Turnaround in Controversial Issues.” In Proceedings of the WebSci ’20: 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, ACM New York, July 2020, 174–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan. 2016. “‘Real Men don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics 911: 80–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernández Campoy, Juan Manuel. 1993. “Dialectología tradicional, sociolingüística laboviana y geolingüística trudgilliana: Tres aproximaciones al estudio de la variación (Traditional dialectology, Labovian sociolinguistics and Trudgillian geolinguistics: Three approaches to the study of variation).” ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante 91: 151–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jane, Emma A. 2014. “‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Continuum – Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 28 (4): 558–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jane, Emma. 2016. “Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism.” Continuum 30 (3): 284–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel, Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning. 2019. “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7 (1): 6–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonora Esposito. 2018. “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-Mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-Biased Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 14 (1): 45–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kissling, Elizabeth A. 1991. “Street Harassment: The Language of Sexual Terrorism.” Discourse and Society 2 (4): 451–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2021. “Xenophobia, Misogyny and Rape Culture: Targeting Women in Cyberspace.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lagarde, Marcela. 2005. Los cautiverios de las mujeres: Madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas (Women’s captivity: Mother-wives, nuns, whores, prisoners and insane). Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lycarião, Diógenes, and Marcelo Alves dos Santos. 2017. “Bridging Semantic and Social Network Analyses: The Case of the Hashtag #precisamosfalarsobreaborto (‘we need to talk about abortion’) on Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (3): 368–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ministerio de Salud, Fija directrices para los servicios de salud sobre esterilización femenina y masculina, Res. 2326 exenta, November 30, 2000, [URL]
, Regula la despenalización de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales, Ley Número 21.030, September, 23, 2017, [URL]
Morán Faúndes, José. M. 2017. De vida o muerte. Patriarcado, heteronormatividad y el discurso de la vida del activismo “pro-vida” en la Argentina (On life and death. patriarchy, heteronormativity and the discourse of life in pro-life activism in Argentina). Córdoba: Centro de Estudios Avanzados.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulvey, Laura. 1989. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” In Visual and Other Pleasures, ed. by Laura Mulvey, 14–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navarrete, Camila. 2014. “¿Por qué algunos políticos ‘juran’ y otros ‘prometen’? (Why do some politicians ‘swear in’ and others ‘promise’)”. Bio Bio, March 11, 2014. [URL]
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1995. “Objectification.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 24 (4): 249–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Objectification and Internet Misogyny.” The Offensive Internet, ed. by Saul Levmore, and Martha C. Nussbaum, 68–87. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connell, Ciara, and Christina Zampas. 2018. “The Human Rights Impact of Gender Stereotyping in the Context of Reproductive Health Care.” Gynecology & Obstetrics 144 (1): 116–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann Unger, and Michele Zappavigna. 2014. Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2006. “Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at Work.” In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stephan Th. Gries, 267–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlinger, Deana. 2006. “Friends and Foes: Media, Politics, and Tactics in the Abortion War.” Social Problems 53 (4): 537–561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojas, Darío. 2012. “Huevón como marcador del discurso en el español de Chile: Huellas de un proceso de gramaticalización (Huevón as a discourse marker in Chilean Spanish: Traces of a grammaticalization process).” Revista de Humanidades (25): 145–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlosberg, Jason. 2001. “Judgment on ‘Nuremberg’: An Analysis of Free Speech and Anti-Abortion Threats Made on the Internet.” Journal of Science & Technology Law – Boston University 52 (7): 52–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sepúlveda, Raquel. 2017. “Un análisis histórico sobre los modelos mentales que entregan los políticos en el debate sobre la ley de la despenalización del aborto en Chile (A historical analysis of politicians’ mental models on the debate about the de-criminalization of abortion in Chile).” MA diss., University of Bergen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, Roberto. 2019. “From Scandal to Reforms: Chile’s Unusual Breakthrough.” Americas Quarterly July 22, 2019. [URL]
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sundén, Jenny, and Susanna Paasonen. 2018. “Shameless Hags and Tolerance Whores: Feminist Resistance and the Affective Circuits of Online Hate.” Feminist Media Studies 18 (4): 643–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte, and Anna Marchi. 2018. Corpus Approaches to Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Laura. 2018. “‘I Can Be your Tinder Nightmare’: Harassment and Misogyny in the Online Sexual Marketplace.” Feminism & Psychology 28 (1): 69–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaggione, Juan M. 2005. “Reactive Politicization and Religious Dissidence: The Political Mutations of the Religious.” Social Theory and Practice 31 (2): 165–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vivanco, José. M. 2018. “A Backward Step for Reproductive Rights in Chile.” Human Rights Watch, April 16, 2018. Accessed September 3, 2019. [URL]
Williams, Timothy, and Alan Blinder. 2019. “Lawmakers Vote to Effectively Ban Abortion in Alabama.” The New York Times, May 14, 2019. [URL]
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Cover, Rob, Nicola Henry, Joscelyn Gleave, Sharon Greenfield, Viktor Grechyn & Thuc Bao Huynh
2025. Protecting public figures online: how do platforms and regulators define public figures?. Media International Australia 196:1 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía
2025. Conflict talk in Spanish digital interactions. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, Nicolás García & Andrés Carvallo
2025. Tsundoku: A Python toolkit for social network analysis. SoftwareX 29 ► pp. 102008 ff. DOI logo
Lünenborg, Margreth & Annabella Backes
2025. Affective Dynamics in #MyBodyMyChoice Memetic Performances on TikTok: Between Feminist Killjoys and Happy Feminism. Javnost - The Public 32:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Arredondo, Carolina, Anna Ivanova & Eduardo Graells-Garrido
2025. Immigrant-Friendly Stakeholders and the Use of Twitter as a Digital Third Space in Chile: Is That So?. Journal of Language and Discrimination 9:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Cover, Rob, Nicola Henry, Thuc Bao Huynh, Joscelyn Gleave, Viktor Grechyn & Sharon Greenfield
2024. Platform policy and online abuse: Understanding differential protections for public figures. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 30:6 ► pp. 2152 ff. DOI logo
Nartey, Mark
2024. Examining the communication of female political leaders in the Global South. Journal of Language and Politics 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
van der Vegt, Isabelle
2024. Gender differences in online abuse: the case of Dutch politicians. Crime Science 13:1 DOI logo
Jones, Lucy, Małgorzata Chałupnik, Jai Mackenzie & Louise Mullany
2022. ‘STFU and start listening to how scared we are’: Resisting misogyny on Twitter via #NotAllMen. Discourse, Context & Media 47 ► pp. 100596 ff. DOI logo
Pérez Sánchez, Beatriz, Juan José Burgos Padilla, Carolina Alveal-Álamos, Andrés Concha-Salgado, Luisa Jara Sepúlveda & Francisco Javier Rodríguez Díaz
2022. Design and study of psychometric properties of the Community Attitude to Abortion Scale (CAAS) with the Chilean population: Autonomy and Stigma. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Silva-Paredes, Daniela & Daniela Ibarra Herrera
2022. Resisting anti-democratic values with misogynistic abuse against a Chilean right-wing politician on Twitter: The #CamilaPeluche incident. Discourse & Communication 16:4 ► pp. 426 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue