Cover not available

Article published In: Discourses of aggression in Greek digitally-mediated communication
Edited by Ourania Hatzidaki and Ioannis E. Saridakis
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:2] 2020
► pp. 156–187

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

“An equal right to comment”

Metapragmatic negotiation of (im)politeness norms in a confrontational Greek YouTube polylogue discussing online public female nudity

ORCiD logo with link | Hellenic Air Force Academy
Published online: 11 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00037.hat
Abstract
This paper analyses a snapshot of a conflictive Greek YouTube polylogue dealing with the issue of public online female nudity and the norms pertaining to both the act itself and its verbal critique. The said polylogue contains a markedly high proportion of lay (im)politeness/(in)appropriateness evaluations (Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar). By quantifying and critically analyzing key lexical impoliteness (Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) and metapragmatic markers contained in the evaluations, I identify the ways in which the norms of online verbal behaviour are discursively negotiated amongst the polylogue participants, focusing especially on the arguments and justifications underlying the suggested norms. It is found that, firstly, the notions of (im)politeness/(in)appropriateness emerge as open to fierce, yet heavily argument-supported discursive dispute; secondly, sexualized slang functions both as an object of critique and as an extremely versatile rhetorical instrument serving metapragmatic argumentation; and, thirdly, online (im)politeness/(in)appropriateness is construed not as a superficial matter of netiquette, but as a deeply ethical and political-ideological controversy, especially regarding speech liberty and political correctness.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
    • 2.1Relational work and the metapragmatics of (im)politeness/(in)appropriateness
    • 2.2First-order (im)politeness evaluations in online communication
  • 3.The video and the accompanying polylogue: An initial description
  • 4.Verbal reactions to the video protagonists’ act of nudity
    • 4.1Greek male participants addressing or referring to the female video protagonist
      • 4.1.1Terms referring to the woman as a whole person
      • 4.1.2Terms denoting the woman’s body or body parts
    • 4.2General remarks
  • 5.Metapragmatic commentary in the C&R polylogue
    • 5.1Negotiating the general (medium-independent) norms of addressing a woman baring herself in public
    • 5.2Negotiating the medium-specific norms of addressing a woman baring herself in public
  • 6.Summary and conclusion
    • 6.1Summary of metapragmatic argumentation in the C&R polylogue
    • 6.2Concluding remarks: Lay definitions of politeness
  • 7.Epilogue
  • Notes
  • References
References (56)
References
Allan, Keith, and Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anastasiadi-Simeonidi, Anna. 2008. “Το Mόρφημα θεο- στην Eλληνική [The Morpheme theo- in Greek].” In Γλώσσης Χάριν – Τόμος αφιερωμένος από τον Τομέα Γλωσσολογίας στον καθηγητή Γεώργιο Μπαμπινιώτη [For Language’s Sake: A Volume Dedicated by the Department of Linguistics to Professor Georgios Babiniotis], ed. by Amalia Mozer, Ekaterini Bakakou-Orfanou, Christoforos Charalambakis, and Despina Chila-Markopoulou, 99–113. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angouri, Jo, and Tseliga, Theodora. 2010. “‘you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’: From E-disagreement to E-impoliteness in Two Online Fora.” Journal of Politeness Research 61: 57–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 2005. “The Metapragmatics of Politeness in Israeli Society.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 225–280. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics 731: 19–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression Against Women.” In Exploring Language Aggression Against Women, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, 59–81. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2015. “Participant Roles and Embedded Interactions in Online Sports Broadcasts.” In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions, ed. by Marta Dynel, and Jan Chovanec, 67–95. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christopoulou, Katerina. 2016. Μια λεξικολογική προσέγγιση στο περιθωριακό λεξιλόγιο της Νέας Ελληνικής. [A lexicological approach to the slang vocabulary of Modern Greek]. PhD Thesis, University of Patras.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christopoulou, Κaterina, and Giorgos J. Xydopoulos. 2014. “Issues d’équivalence en Grec et en Anglais Argotique: les cas de ‘malákas’, ‘ghamó’ et ‘fuck’. [Issues of Equivalence in Greek and English Slang: The Case of ‘malákas’, ‘ghamó’ and ‘fuck’.]” Argotica 1 (3): 45–56.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester, UK & Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2010. “A Genre Approach to Impoliteness in a Spanish Television Talk Show: Evidence from Corpus Analysis, Questionnaires and Focus Groups.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (4): 689–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavriilidou, Zoe. 2014. “Intensifying Prefixes in Greek.” In Selected Papers of the 11th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Rhodes, 26–29 September 2013, ed. by G. Kotzoglou, K. Nikolou, E. Karantzola, K. Frantzi, I. Galantomos, M. Georgalidou, V. Kourti-Kazoullis, C. Papadopoulou, and E. Vlachou, 468–478. Rhodes: University of the Aegean.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gherardi, Silvia. 1995. Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Judith. 2005. Representing Agrippina: Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, Sage L. 2007. “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict, (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 742–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. “Interaction and Conflict in Digital Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by Matthew Evans, Leslie Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 310–328. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2007. “The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research 31: 295–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “When is an Email Really Offensive?: Argumentativity and Variability in Evaluations of Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 61: 7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen. 2013. “Introduction to the Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Pragmatics of Computer Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–32. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2001. “‘Oh’, Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments.” Discourse and Society 121: 123–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jane, Emma A. 2014. “‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 28 (4): 558–570. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Misogyny Online: A Short (and Brutish) History. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Elizabeth. 2017. “‘Let them Know that Men Did this’: Medusa, Rape and Female Rivalry in Contemporary Film and Women’s Writing.” In Bad Girls and Transgressive Women in Popular Television, Fiction, and Film, ed. by Julie A. Chappell, and Mallory Young, 183–208. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel. 2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Dániel, and Rosina Márquez-Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness and (Im)morality: Insights from Intervention.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 239–260.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kakridis, Ioannis Th. 1986. Ελληνική Μυθολογία: Οι Θεοί. [Greek Mythology: Gods]. Athens: Ekdotiki Athinon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karaian, Lara. 2013. “Policing ‘Sexting’: Responsibilization, Respectability and Sexual Subjectivity in Child Protection/Crime Prevention Responses to Teenagers’ Digital Sexual Expression.” Theoretical Criminology 18 (3): 282–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levine, Étan. 2009. Marital Relations in Ancient Judaism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and Politeness in Action. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Power and Politeness in Action. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. “Interpersonal Pragmatics and its Link to (Im)politeness Research.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 5–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Derek Bousfield. 2008. Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2011. “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 2578–2593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2017. English Politeness and Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2010. Impoliteness in Japanese BBS Interactions: Observations from Message Exchanges in two Online Communities. Journal of Politeness Research 61: 33–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Sharon. 2004. ““Tough Enough”: Female Friendship and Heroism in Xena and Buffy.” In Action Chicks: New Images of Tough Women in Popular Culture, ed. by Sherrie A. Inness, 231–256. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1930. The Conquest of Happiness. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Savvidou, Paraskevi. 2012. “Μετριασμός και Επίταση με τη Χρήση των Μορφημάτων ψιλο- και θεο-: Ανάλυση σε Σώματα Κειμένων. [Mitigation and Intensification via the Use of the Morphemes psilo- and theo-: A Corpus-Based Analysis.]” In Selected Papers of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics, 1–4 September 2011, Komotini, ed. by Zoe Gavriilidou, Angeliki Efthymiou, Evangelia Thomadaki, and Penelope Kambakis-Vougiouklis, 1092–1099. Komotini: Democritus University of Thrace.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 1992. Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Conceptualizing Politeness in Greek: Evidence from Twitter.” Journal of Pragmatics 861: 25–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Conflict, Disagreement and (Im)politeness.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language in Conflict, ed. by Matthew Evans, Leslie Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 176–195. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria, and Spiridoula Bella. 2019. “Twitter, Politeness, Self-Presentation.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions, ed. by Patricia Bou-Franch, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, 341–365. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sutherland, Kate. 2003. “From Jailbird to Jailbait: Age of Consent Laws and the Construction of Teenage Sexualities.” William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law 9 (3): 131–349.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Graeme. 2010. Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallace, Diana. 2000. Sisters and Rivals in British Women’s Fiction, 1914–39. Hampshire: Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. “Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo Vadis?.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, xi-xlvii. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. 2005. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werkhofer, Konrad T. 2005. “Traditional and Modern Views: The Social Constitution and Power of Politeness.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd edition, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 155–199. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Hatzidaki, Ourania
2024. “I’ll throw acid on your pretty little face […], so wrote a genteel fanatic antifeminist”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Heitmayer, Maxi & Robin Schimmelpfennig
2024. Netiquette as Digital Social Norms. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 40:13 ► pp. 3334 ff. DOI logo
Krikela, Sofia
2022. Disagreements in a feminist digital safe space. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Sagredos, Christos & Evelin Nikolova
2022. ‘Slut I hate you’. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue