Cover not available

Article published In: Closeness and conflict: The discourse of domestic discord across English and Spanish-speaking communities
Edited by Diana Boxer and María Elena Placencia
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2] 2018
► pp. 228–247

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Conflict in corpora

Investigating family conflict sequences using a corpus pragmatic approach

 | Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick
Published online: 26 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00011.cla
Abstract
The analysis of conflict in family discourse has often been characterised by ethnographic approaches and/or fine-grained analysis of unique conflict episodes. This article, by contrast, uses a c.175,000-word spoken corpus of Irish family discourse, in conjunction with a corpus pragmatic approach, to explore specific linguistic aspects of conflict discourse. Conflict episodes are identified and analysed in the corpus using a range of linguistic “hooks” (Rühlemann, Christoph. 2010. “What Can a Corpus Tell us about Pragmatics?” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by Anne O’Keeffe, and Michael McCarthy, 288–301. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) that have been previously associated with prefacing disagreement such as the marker well, mitigators (I think, I mean, I guess) or the counterargument strategy yes but. The analysis reveals that the family members most frequently use the yeah but strategy in conflict episodes which facilitates immediate disagreement. This strategy is often accompanied by a range of mitigators, predominantly in turn final position, some of which have not been previously identified as indexing conflict sequences.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature on markers that characterise conflict sequences
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Analysis and discussion
    • 4.1Locating and quantifying conflict sequences in the corpus of family discourse
    • 4.2The mitigation and structure of conflict sequences in the corpus of family discourse
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (61)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Christoph Rühlemann (eds.). 2015. Corpus Pragmatics. A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1997. Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bochner, Arthur. 1984. “The Function of Human Communication in Interpersonal Bonding.” In Handbook of Rhetorical and Communication Theory, edited by Carroll Arnold and John Waite Bowers, 544–621. London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono. 2015. “Beyond Conflicts: Origin and Types of Issues Leading to Argumentative Discussions during Family Mealtimes.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3(2): 263–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Brian. 2002. “The Exchange in Family Discourse.” Teanga 211: 134–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Investigating Intimate Discourse: Exploring the Spoken Interaction of Families, Couples and Friends. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Brian, and Elaine Vaughan. 2012. “ It’s Lunacy Now: A Corpus-based Pragmatic Analysis of the Use of now in Contemporary Irish English.” In New Perspectives on Irish English, edited by Bettina Migge, and Máire Ní Chiosáin, 225–246. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra Thompson. 2000. “Concessive Patterns in Conversation.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives, edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Bernd Kortmann, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diani, Giuliana. 2004. “The Discourse Functions of I don’t know in English Conversation.” In Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora, edited by Karin Aijmer, and Anna-Brita Stenström, 157–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean, and Josef Schrock. 2002. “Basic Meanings of you know and I mean .” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (6): 727–747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia McAllister, Paula. 2015. “Speech Acts: A Synchronic Perspective.” In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, edited by Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann, 29–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2001. “Arguing about the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (12): 1881–1900. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1990. “Interstitial Argument.” In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation, edited by Allen Grimshaw, 85–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia. 2009. Making Meanings, Creating Family: Intertextuality and Framing in Family Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. 1993. “The Case for the Exchange Complex.” In Data, Description, Discourse. Papers on the English Language in Honour of John Sinclair, edited by Michael Hoey, 115–138. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtgraves, Thomas. 1997. “Yes, but…: Positive Politeness in Conversation Arguments.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16 (2): 222–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 1996. Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Graeme. 1998. An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: >Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2008. “Tracing Directives through Text and Time: Towrds a Methodology of a Corpus-based Diachronic Speech-act Analysis.” In Speech Acts in the History of English, edited by Andreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 1993. “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures.” Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, David A. 1997. “Frame Conflicts and Competing Construals in Family Argument.” Journal of Pragmatics 27 (3): 339–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula, and Andrew Kehoe. 2017. ““I Apologise for My Poor Blogging”: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus .” Corpus Pragmatics 1 (1): 37–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas. 1985. “How Children Start Arguments.” Language in Society 14 (1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 1998. Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Wilson. 1996. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and William Turnbull. 1998. “Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (3): 225–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musi, Elena. 2018. “How did you change my view? A Corpus-based Study of Concessions’ Argumentative Role.” Discourse Studies 20 (2): 270–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musgrave, Simon, Andrea Schalley, and Michael Haugh. 2014. “The use of Ontologies as a Tool for Aggregating Spoken Corpora.” In Best Practices for Spoken Corpora in Linguistic Research, edited by Şükriye Ruhi, Michael Haugh, Thomas Schmidt, and Kai Wörner, 225–248. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal, and Alice Spitz. 2008. “Humour as a Resource for Mitigating Conflict in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (10): 1661–1686. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Placencia, María Elena. 2008. “(Non)Compliance with Directives among Family and Friends: Responding to Social Pressure and Individual Wants.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (3): 315–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Michael McCarthy, and Ronald Carter. 2007. From Corpus to Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne, Brian Clancy, and Svenja Adolphs, 2011. Introducing Pragmatics in Use. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, Candlelight and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees-Miller, Janie. 2000. “Power, Severity, and Context in Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (8): 1087–1111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rips, Lance. 1998. ‘Reasoning and Conversation.’ Psychological Review 1051: 411–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, Jesús (ed.). 2008. Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2010. “What Can a Corpus Tell us about Pragmatics?” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by Anne O’Keeffe, and Michael McCarthy, 288–301. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph, and Brian Clancy. 2018. “Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, edited by Cornelia Ilie, and N. Norrick. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 241–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1984. “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society 13 (3): 311–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2017. WordSmith Tools Version 7.0. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Conversational Style: Analysing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Intertextuality in Interaction: Reframing Family Arguments in Public and Private.” Text and Talk 26 (4/5): 597–617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy. 1991. “The Pragmatic Functions of I don’t know .” Text 11 (4): 607–622. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, Lynn, and Richard West. 2006. Perspectives on Family Communication. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaughan, Elaine, and Brian Clancy. 2013. “Small Corpora and Pragmatics.” Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 11: 53–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Sociolinguistic Information and Irish English Corpora.” In Sociolinguistics in Ireland, edited by Raymond Hickey, 365–388. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vaughan, Elaine, Michael McCarthy and Brian Clancy. 2017. “Vague Category Markers as Turn Final Items in Irish English.” World Englishes 36 (2): 208–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija. 1979. “The Structure of Casual Conversation in English.” Journal of Pragmatics 3(3–4): 267–298. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vuchinich, Samuel. 1984. “Sequencing and Social Structure in Family Conflict.” Social Psychology Quarterly 47 (3): 217–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “The Sequential Organisation of Closing in Verbal Family Conflict.” In Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation, edited by Allen Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisser, Martin. 2003. “SPAACy: A Semi-automated Tool for Analysing Dialogue Acts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (1): 63–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Ashley. 2005. “Fighting Words and Challenging Expectations: Language Alternation and Social Roles in a Family Dispute.” Journal of Pragmatics 37 (3): 317–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Maldonado, Ricardo
2025. Impersonal and middle constructions in Spanish oral conflictive discourse. In The Grammar of Interaction [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 46], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Nisticò, Simona
2023. Translating conflict in written fiction. In Pragmatics and Translation [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 337], ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue