Cover not available

Article published In: Closeness and conflict: The discourse of domestic discord across English and Spanish-speaking communities
Edited by Diana Boxer and María Elena Placencia
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2] 2018
► pp. 203–227

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The discursive practices of “guilting” in family discourse

Socialization, identity construction, and parental expectations

 | LaGuardia Community College, City University of New York
Published online: 26 November 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00010.joh
Abstract
This study looks at the way in which four members of a Midwestern American family co-construct the adult child identity of two graduate school students by using particular discursive practices while discussing topics related to parental expectations and decision-making. More specifically, it focuses on what constitutes “guilting” in the adult child-parent interactions. The data shows that guilting, both direct and indirect, is accomplished through making complaints and assessments. Participants orient to particular utterances as guilting and respond with justifications, explanations, or deflection. Guilting is shown to be used as a tool to control others’ future actions and/or to establish closer connection.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical Construct
    • 2.1The discursive practices of “guilting”
    • 2.2The family context
    • 2.3Connection and control
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1A family history of guilting
    • 4.2The subtle guilt of parental expectations
      • 4.2.1Justification as a response
      • 4.2.2Discussion: Parental expectations and adult child justifications
    • 4.3Guilting and negotiating the adult child identity through extended discussion
      • 4.3.1The imposition
      • 4.3.2Addressing the complaint
      • 4.3.3The resolution
      • 4.3.4Discussion: Cyclical strategies and tensions between interactional goals
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (54)
References
Alberts, J. K. 1988. “An Analysis of Couples’ Conversational Complaint Interactions.” Communication Monographs 55 (2): 184–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989. “A Descriptive Taxonomy of Couples’ Complaints.” Southern Communication Journal 54 (2): 125–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. 1997. Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity.” In Style in Language, edited by Thomas Albert Sebeok, 253–76. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana. 1993. Complaining and Commiserating: A Speech Act View of Solidarity in Spoken American English. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortés-Conde. 1997. “From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display.” Journal of Pragmatics 27 (3): 275–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buttny, Richard. 1993. Social Accountability in Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortés-Conde, Florencia, and Diana Boxer. 2010. “Humorous Self Disclosures as Resistance to Socially Imposed Gender Roles.” Gender and Language 4 (1): 73–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fingerman, Karen L. 1996. “Sources of Tension in the Aging Mother and Adult Daughter Relationship.” Psychology and Aging 11 (4): 591–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fingerman, Karen L., Pei Chun Chen, Elizabeth Hay, Kelly E. Cichy, and Eva S. Lefkowitz. 2006. “Ambivalent Reactions in the Parent and Offspring Relationship.” The Journals of Gerontology, Series B, 61 (3): 152–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fivush, Robyn. 2002, April. “The Co-construction of Identity in Family Narratives.” MARIAL. The Emory Center for Myth and Ritual in American Life: A Sloan Center for Working Families, Emory University. Available at: [URL]. Accessed: 03-15-07.
. 2013. “Family Reminiscing and the Construction of the Autobiographical Self.” Interacções 9 (24): 170–213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Frame Analysis: From Felicity’s Condition.” In The Goffman Reader, edited by Charles Lemert and Ann Branaman, 167–200. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia. 2004. “‘Al Gore’s Our Guy’: Linguistically Constructing a Family Political Identity.” Discourse & Society 15 (5): 607–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “‘I Just Feel Horribly Embarrassed When She Does That’: Constituting a Mother’s Identity.” In Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families, edited by Deborah Tannen, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon, 71–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Impression Management on Reality TV: Emotion in Parental Accounts.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 3551–3564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context, edited by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 2012. “Using Laugh Responses to Defuse Complaints.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 430–448. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sally, and Elinor Ochs. 1995. “Co-construction: An Introduction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 171–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. “Transcript Notation.” In Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, ix–xvi, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1987. “Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organisation, edited by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebekah. 2007. “The Co-Construction of Roles and Patterns of Interaction in Family Discourse.” Teachers College, Columbia University, Working Papers in TESOL and Applied Linguistics 7 (2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebekah J. 2011. “Discursive Practices in Family Discourse: Co-Constructing the Identity of Adult Children.” EdD diss., Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3484360).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebekah. 2012, September. “The Discursive Practices of “Guilting” in Family Discourse: Socialization, Identity Construction, and Parental Expectations.” Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Meeting of Language and Social Interaction Working Group (LANSI), Teachers College, New York City.
Johnson, Rebekah J. 2015. “Tensions in Family Discourse: Expectations and Justifications.” In Linking Discourse Studies to Professional Practice, edited by Lubie Grujicic-Alatriste, 203–226. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendall, Shari. 2008. “The Balancing Act: Framing Gendered Parental Identities at Dinnertime.” Language in Society 37 (4): 539–568. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marinova, Diana. 2007. “Finding the Right Balance between Connection and Control: A Father’s Identity Construction in Conversations with His College-Age Daughter.” In Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families, edited by Deborah Tannen, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon, 103–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, and Carolyn Taylor. 1992. “Family Narrative as Political Activity.” Discourse & Society 3 (3): 301–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “Mothers’ Role in the Everyday Reconstruction of ‘Father Knows Best.’” In Locating Power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, edited by Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz, and Birch Moonwoman, 447–462. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paugh, Amy L. 2005. “Learning About Work at Dinnertime: Language Socialization in Dual-Earner American Families.” Discourse & Society 16 (1): 55–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2003. “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton, 229–249. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Volume 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33 (1): 46–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sterponi, Laura. 2003. “Account Episodes in Family Discourse: The Making of Morality in Everyday Interaction.” Discourse Studies 5 (1): 79–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Straehle, Carolyn A. 1993. “‘Samuel?’ ‘Yes, dear?’: Teasing and Conversational Rapport.” In Framing in Discourse, edited by Deborah Tannen, 210–230. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993a. “What’s in a Frame?”. In Framing in Discourse, edited by Deborah Tannen, 14–56. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993b. “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance.” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, edited by Deborah Tannen, 165–188. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. I Only Say This Because I Love You: How the Way We Talk Can Make or Break Family Relationships Throughout Our Lives. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003a. “Gender and Family Interaction.” In The Handbook of Language and Gender, edited by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 179–201. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. “Power Maneuvers or Connection Maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction.” In Linguistics, Language, and the Real World: Discourse and Beyond, edited by Deborah Tannen and James E. Alatis, 50–62. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Talking the Dog: Framing Pets as Interactional Resources in Family Discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37 (4): 399–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, Shari Kendall, and Cynthia Gordon. (Eds.) 2007. Family Talk: Discourse and Identity in Four American Families. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Carolyn E. 1995. “‘You Think It Was a Fight?’: Co-Constructing (the Struggle for) Meaning, Face, and Family in Everyday Narrative Activity.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (3): 283–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traverso, Veronique. 2009. “The Dilemmas of Third-Party Complaints in Conversation between Friends.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2385–2399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 1991. Power in Family Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Muriel Schulz. 1986. The Language of Love and Guilt. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Liu, Zhiyi
2023. An adult daughter's identity construction: Membership categorization analysis of daily Chinese-Australian family talk. Journal of Pragmatics 207 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DelPrete, Domenica L.
2021. Troubles talk in mother-daughter interaction: Social bond building or social bond blocking?. Language & Communication 80 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue