Cover not available

Discussion published In: Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
Vol. 6:1 (2018) ► pp.149–165

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Discussion

Theoretically on Mock Politeness in English and Italian

ORCiD logo with link | University of Łódź
Published online: 2 July 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00007.dyn
Abstract
This essay offers insights into the problematic notions of irony, sarcasm and mock politeness, inspired by Charlotte Taylor’s recent monograph Mock Politeness in English and Italian. A Corpus-Assisted Metalanguage Analysis. Different understandings of the concept of mock politeness, as well as sarcasm and irony, are succinctly depicted. Some explanation is also provided for the contradictory findings reported in previous scholarship with regard to the im/politeness effects of irony. Additionally, this paper revisits Taylor’s select conclusions about the use of the first-order labels that she considers pertinent to mock politeness (i.e. labels used by lay language users).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.(Re)defining mock politeness: Beyond sarcasm and irony
  • 3.Im/politeness effects of irony
  • 4.First-order mock politeness labels
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (61)
References
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, edited by Miriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 102–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, Elisabeth. 2012. “Sarcasm, Pretense, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Noûs 461. 587–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert. 1997. “Salting a Wound or Sugaring a Pill: The Pragmatic Functions of Ironic Criticism.” Discourse Processes 231: 25–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Contrast and Assimilation in Verbal Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 111–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert, and Shauna Keller. 1998. “You’ll Never Believe This. Irony and Hyperbole in Expressing Surprise.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 271: 499–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1557–1583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, Robert T., Karen Tracy, and Frances Spisak. 1986. “The Discourse of Requests: Assessments of a Politeness Approach.” Human Communication Research 12 (4): 437–468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 251: 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link .” Journal of Politeness Research 11: 35–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 351: 1545–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly and Ellen Winner. 1997. “Attributing Meaning to Deliberately False Utterances: The Case of Irony.” In The Problem of Meaning: Behavioral and Cognitive Perspectives, edited by Ch. Mandell and A. McCabe, 377–414. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan, and Ellen Winner. 1995. “Why Not Say It Directly? The Social Functions of Irony.” Discourse Processes 191: 347–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2009. Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. “Impoliteness as Disaffiliative Humour in Film Talk.” In Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, edited by Marta Dynel, 105–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. “Irony from a Neo-Gricean Perspective: On Untruthfulness and Evaluative Implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics 101: 403–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013c. “When Does Irony Tickle the Hearer? Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony.” Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, edited by Marta Dynel, 298–320. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Isn’t It Ironic? Defining the Scope of Humorous Irony.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 271: 619–639. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Intention to Deceive, Bald-Faced Lies, and Deceptive Implicature: Insights into Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface .” Intercultural Pragmatics 121: 309–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. “Conceptualising Conversational Humour as (Im)politeness: The Case of Film Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research 12(1): 117–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. “‘Trolling Is Not Stupid’: Internet Trolling as the Art of Deception Serving Entertainment.” Intercultural Pragmatics 131: 353–381 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017a. “Academics vs. American Scriptwriters vs. Academics: A Battle over the Etic and Emic ‘Sarcasm’ and ‘Irony’ Labels.” Language & Communication 551: 69–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. “But Seriously: On Conversational Humour and (Un)truthfulness.” Lingua 1971: 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. “No Child’s Play: A Philosophical Pragmatic View of Overt Pretence as a Vehicle for Conversational Humour.” In Creating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Interactions, edited by Villy Tsakona and Jan Chovanec, 205–228. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Irony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “The Status Quo and Quo-Vadis of Impoliteness Research.” Intercultural Pragmatics 71: 535–559. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garmendia, Joana. 2010. “Irony is Critical.” Pragmatics and Cognition 181: 397–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “She’s (Not) a Fine Friend: ‘Saying’ and Criticism in Irony.” Intercultural Pragmatics 81: 41–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “A (Neo)Gricean Account of Irony: An Answer to Relevance Theory.” International Review of Pragmatics 71: 40–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond, Jr., and Herbert Colston. 2002. “The Risks and Rewards of Ironic Communication.” In Say not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication, edited by Luigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri and Giuseppe Riva, 187–200. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul. (1975) 1989. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2012. “Epilogue: The First-Second Order Distinction in Face and Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 111–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “‘Just Kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 951: 120–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield. 2012. “Mock Impoliteness in Interactions amongst Australian and British Speakers of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 441: 1099–1114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna. 2009. “Cancelability and the Primary/Secondary Meaning Distinction.” Intercultural Pragmatics 61: 259–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Julia. 1996. “The Functions of Sarcastic Irony in Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics 261: 613–634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapogianni, Eleni. 2011. “Irony via ‘Surrealism’.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, edited by Marta Dynel, 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, Debra Long, and Mary Church. 1991. “On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 61: 149–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, and Mary Brown. 1995. “How about Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1241: 3–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahon, James E. 2015. “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL <[URL]>.
Meibauer, Jörg. 2014. Lying and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2006. The Linguistics of Laughter. A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge Studies in Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Richard, and Roger Kreuz. 1994. “Why Do People Use Figurative Language?” Psychological Science 51: 159–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinkeviciute, Valeria. 2013. “Decoding Encoded (Im)politeness: Cause on my Teasing You Can Depend.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, edited by Marta Dynel, 263–288. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017a. “Funniness and ‘the Preferred Reaction’ to Jocularity in Australian and British English: An Analysis of Interviewees’ Metapragmatic Comments.” Language & Communication 551: 41–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. “‘It’s Just a Bit of Cultural […] Lost in Translation’: Australian and British Intracultural and Intercultural Metapragmatic Evaluations of Jocularity.” Lingua 1971: 50–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Charlotte. 2015. “Beyond Sarcasm: The Metalanguage and Structures of Mock Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 871: 127–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Mock Politeness and Culture: Perceptions and Practice in UK and Italian Data.” Intercultural Pragmatics 13 (4): 463–498.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “The Relationship between Irony and Sarcasm: Insights from a First-Order Metalanguage Investigation.” Journal of Politeness Research 13 (2): 209–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toplak, Mary, and Albert Katz. 2000. “On the Uses of Sarcastic Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1467–1488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. 2004. Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. 1992. “Introduction.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, edited by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whalen, Juanita M., Penny M. Pexman, Alastair J. Gill, and Scott Nowson. 2013. “Verbal Irony Use in Personal Blogs.” Behaviour and IT 32 (6): 560–569.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Hansson, Sten
2024. Coercive impoliteness and blame avoidance in government communication. Discourse, Context & Media 58 ► pp. 100770 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Keyuan, Ling Zhou & Shaojie Zhang
2023. Explicit and implicit (im)politeness: A corpus-based study of the Chinese formulaic expression “Nikezhen+X”. Lingua 291 ► pp. 103560 ff. DOI logo
Teneketzi, Korallia
2022. Impoliteness across social media platforms. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 10:1 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2020. On being roasted, toasted and burned: (Meta)pragmatics of Wendy's Twitter humour. Journal of Pragmatics 166 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Todd, James Allen
2019. “It has the ability to make the other person feel comfortable”: L1 Japanese speakers’ folk descriptions of aizuchi. Lingua 230 ► pp. 102737 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue