Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 3:1 (2015) ► pp.127–147

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The influence of the math classroom context on students’ academic English production

 | University of Minnesota
Published online: 9 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.06liu
The case study summarized in this article relies primarily on activity theory (e.g., Engestrom, 1987), and incorporates complexity, accuracy, and fluency analyses (see Ellis & Barkhuizen, 2005) to describe real-time oral language production by four focal English language learners (ELLs) in a sheltered high school math classroom in the U.S. Further, it describes how that language use was influenced by the classroom context. Findings indicate that ELLs produced very little complex, elaborated academic language because there were a variety of contextual factors that interacted to minimize students’ need to use it. Insights gained from an activity theory perspective highlight the influence of three unresolved tensions in the classroom activity system, namely: low language expectations in the curriculum, the teacher’s lack of familiarity with L2 instructional strategies, and the students’ lack of engagement with “best” practices that included use of hands-on material. Greater administrator support and transparency about desired academic language outcomes could enhance both the teachers’ language development skills and student outcomes.
References (45)
Abedi, J. (2007). Summary and recommendations. In J. Abedi (Ed.), English language proficiency assessment in the nation: Current status and future practice (pp. 121–132). Davis, CA: University of California, Davis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abedi, J., & Herman, J. (2010). Assessing English language learners’ opportunity to learn mathematics: Issues and limitations. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 723–746.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adler, J. (1997). A participatory-inquiry approach and the mediation of mathematical knowledge in a multilingual classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 235–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., & Amabisca, A. (2010). Defining opportunity to learn for English language learners: Linguistic and cultural dimensions of ELLs’ instructional contexts. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 15(3), 259–278. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailey, A., & Butler, F. (2009). Ethical considerations in the assessment of the language and content knowledge of U. S. school-age English learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(2), 177–193.
Bailey, A, & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum [E-reader version]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bigelow, M. (2010). The policies and politics of educating refugee adolescents. Language Learning, 60 (Supplement 1), 119–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chamot, A. (1996). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 96(3), 259–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, H., Wilmes, C., Boals, T., & Santos, M. (2008). Issues in the development of Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) for WIDA consortium states (WCER Working Paper No. 2008–2). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cramer, K., Behr, M., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (2009). Rational number project: Initial fraction ideas. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1989). Grassroots action to improve ESL programs. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 821, 45–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14(2), 40–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeCapua, A., Smathers, W., & Tang, L. (2009). Meeting the needs of students with limited or interrupted schooling: A guide for educators. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 147–181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Echevarría, J., Vogt, M.E., & Short, D.J. (2010). Making content comprehensible for secondary English learners: The SIOP model. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gersten, R., Baker, S.K., Shanahan, T., Linan-Thompson, S., Collins, P., & Scarcella, R. (2007). Effective literacy and English language instruction for English learners in the elementary grades: A practice guide (NCEE 2007–4011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen-Thomas, H. (2009). English language learners and math: Discourse, participation, and community in reform-oriented, middle school mathematics classes. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hess, K., & Kearns, J. (2010). An introduction to the learning progressions frameworks designed for use with the common core state standards in mathematics K-12. Retrieved from [URL]
Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010–1038. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 3–31). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ketterlin-Geller, L., Chard, D., & Fien, H. (2008). Making connections in mathematics: Conceptual mathematics intervention for low-performing students. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 33–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, K. (2014). An activity theory perspective on academic language use by English language learners in a high school math classroom. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Moschkovich, J. (1999). Supporting the participation of English language learners in mathematical discussions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(1), 11–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Supporting mathematical reasoning and sense making for English learners. In M. Struchens & J. Quander (Eds.), Focus in high school mathematics: Fostering reasoning and sense making for all students (pp. 17–35). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2009). Executive summary — Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense-making. Retrieved from [URL]
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2008). The English language learning progressions: Years 9–13. Retrieved from [URL]
Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical Report 2003–1). Framework. Irvine, CA: The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M.J. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 243–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Goldschmidt, P. (1999). Opportunity to learn, language proficiency, and immigrant status effects on mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 102–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
West, M. (1953). A general service list of English words with semantic frequencies and a supplementary word list for the writing of popular science and technology. London: Longman, Green.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, G. (1997). An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14(1), 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, L., & Kroger, R. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. Boston, MA: Springer US. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwiers, J. (2007). Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 93–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, grades 5–12. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Domke, Lisa M. & María A. Cerrato
2024. Integrating Content and Language Instruction for Multilingual Learners: A Systematic Review Across Program Types. Review of Educational Research DOI logo
Barwell, Richard
2015. Commentary on Berger Dissertation Summary. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3:2 ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Berger, Angela
2015. Conceptualizing the interaction between language and mathematics. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue