Article In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education: Online-First Articles
The impact of intensity of CLIL programmes and extramural English on primary students’ communicative appropriateness in writing
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Abstract
The present study examines the impact of intensity of CLIL programmes on primary school students’ communicative
appropriateness in writing. It also addresses the influence of language exposure beyond the CLIL classroom, considering two
out-of-school activities: watching TV and private tuition. A total of 392 primary students from three schools in the Valencian
Community participated, representing high-intensity, medium-intensity, and low-intensity CLIL programmes. Data were collected
through a written task and a questionnaire adapted from Lasagabaster, D., & Huguet, Á. (2007). Multilingualism
in European bilingual context. Multilingual Matters..
The written task was administered during a CLIL science lesson, and data were coded using a rating scale adapted from Kuiker and
Vedder (2017) and Jacob et al. (1981). Findings from the study reveal that the intensity of CLIL programmes has an impact on
students’ scores in communicative appropriateness in writing. Additionally, the results show that CLIL is beneficial for both
language and content learning when high and medium-intensity CLIL programmes are implemented. Moreover, it shows that Extramural
English (EE), through watching TV in English and private tuition, benefits CLIL learners, especially those enrolled in
low-intensity CLIL programmes. Finally, some pedagogical implications are suggested to enhance learning in CLIL contexts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Research on CLIL at an early age
- 2.2CLIL Intensity and Extramural English
- 2.3CLIL writing and communicative appropriateness
- 3.Method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Instruments, procedure and data analysis
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Author queries
References
References (53)
Anghel, B., Cabrales, A., & Carro, J. M. (2016). Evaluating
a bilingual education program in Spain: The impact beyond foreign language learning. Economic
Inquiry, 54(2), 1202–1223.
Alcón-Soler, E. (2000). Desarrollo
de la competencia discursiva oral en el aula de lenguas extranjeras: Perspectivas metodológicas y de
investigación. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Segundas
lenguas: Adquisición en el
aula (pp. 259–276). Ariel Lingüística.
Arias-Hermoso, R., and A. Imaz-Agirre. (2024). Exploring
Multilingual Writers in Secondary Education: Insights from a Trilingual Corpus. European
Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication.
Artieda, G., Roquet, H., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2017). The
impact of age and exposure on EFL achievement in two learning contexts: formal instruction and formal instruction + content
and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 23(4), 449–472.
Avello, D., & Muñoz, C. (2025). Exploring
young L2 learners’ perceptions of their viewing experience with captioned animated
cartoons. Research Methods in Applied
Linguistics, 4(1), 100174.
Azpilicueta-Martínez, R. (2024a). Exposure
or Age? The effect of additional CLIL instruction on young learners’ grammatical complexity while performing an oral
task. Language Teaching Research,
(2024b). Revising
expectations: The effect of different levels of CLIL exposure on young learners’ oral
performance. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education.
Azpilicueta-Martínez, R., & Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2023). Intensity
of CLIL exposure and L2 motivation in primary school: evidence from Spanish EFL learners in non-CLIL, low-CLIL and high-CLIL
programmes. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language
Teaching,
Bunting, L., & Lindström, B. (2013). Framing
English learning at the intersection of school and out-of-school practices. Journal of
International Scientific Publications: Language, Individual &
Society, 7(1), 205–221.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking
the Role of Communicative Competence in Language Teaching. In E. Alcón-Soler & P. Safont (Eds.), Intercultural
Language Use and Language
Learning (pp. 41–57). Springer.
Chumbay, J., & Ochoa, J. F. Q. (2020). Language-Driven
CLIL: Developing Written Production at the Secondary School Level. English Language
Teaching, 13(8), 74–90.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse
in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. John Benjamins.
Evnitskaya, N., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2023). Cognitive
discourse functions in CLIL classrooms: Eliciting and analysing students’ oral categorisations in science and
history. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 26(3), 311–330.
Goris, J. A., Denessen, E. J., & Verhoeven, L. T. (2019). Effects
of content and language integrated learning in Europe A systematic review of longitudinal experimental
studies. European educational research
journal, 18(6), 675–698.
Gené-Gil, M., Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Development
of EFL writing over three years in secondary education: CLIL and non-CLIL settings. The
Language Learning
Journal, 43(3), 286–303.
Guzmán-Alcón, I. (2026). The
role of hours of CLIL exposure in primary multilingual science
writing. In A. Imaz-Agirre & R. Arias-Hermoso (Eds.), Insights
into disciplinary literacies: Multilingual perspectives across educational
levels. Multilingual Matters.
Herraiz-Martinez, A., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2019). Pragmatic
outcomes in the English-medium instruction context. Applied
Pragmatics, 1(1), 68–91.
Hidalgo, M. A., & Villarreal, I. (2024). Intensity
matters in CLIL: Evidence from primary school learners’ receptive
skills. System, 1251.
Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hearfiel, V., & Hughey, J. (1981). Testing
ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Longman Higher Education.
Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., Gilabert, R. (2010). Communicative
adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In I. Bartning, M. Martin, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Communicative
proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing
research (pp. 81–100). Eurosla
Monographs Series 1.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2014). Rating
written performance: What do raters do and why? Language
Testing, 31(3), 329–348.
(2017). Functional
adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale. Language
Testing, 34(3), 321–336.
(2018). Assessing
functional adequacy of L2 performance in a task-based
approach. In N. Taguchi & Y. Kim (Eds.), Task-Based
Language
Teaching (pp. 266–285). John Benjamins.
(2022). The
assessment of functional adequacy in language performance. Journal on Task-Based Language
Teaching and
Learning, 2(1), 1–7.
Lancaster, N. K. (2018). Extramural
exposure and language attainment: The examination of input-related variables in CLIL
programmes. Porta
Linguarum, 291, 91–114
Lasagabaster, D., & Huguet, Á. (2007). Multilingualism
in European bilingual context. Multilingual Matters.
Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2024a). What
factors contribute to the proficiency of young EFL learners in primary school? Assessing the role of CLIL intensity,
extramural English, non-verbal intelligence and socioeconomic status. Language Teaching
Research, 28(1).
(2024b). Intensity
matters inside and outside primary school: Evidence from high-CLIL, low-CLIL, and non-CLIL
learners. TESOL Quarterly.
Llinares, A., & Whittaker, R. (2010). Writing
and speaking in the history class: A comparative analysis of CLIL and first language
contexts. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), AILA
Applied Linguistics
Series (pp. 125–124). John Benjamins.
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The
roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
Llinares, A. & Nashaat-Sobhy, N. (2021). What
is an ecosystem? Defining science in primary school CLIL contexts. Language Teaching for Young
Learners, 3(2), 337–362.
Llinares, A., & Nikula, T. (2024). CLIL
students’ production of cognitive discourse functions: comparing Finnish and Spanish
contexts. Language and
Education, 38(3),1–20
Llinares, A., & Nashaat-Sobhy, N. (2023). CLIL
students’ academic language performance on a non-curricular topic: A comparison between high-exposure and low-exposure
groups. English Teaching &
Learning, 47(3), 337–358.
Martín-Laguna, S., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2018). Development
of discourse-pragmatic markers in a multilingual classroom: A mixed method research
approach. System, 751, 68–80.
Martín-Laguna, S. (2020). Tasks,
Pragmatics and Multilingualism in the Classroom: A Portrait of Adolescent Writing in Multiple
Languages. Multilingual Matters.
Mattheoudakis, M., Alexiou, T., & Laskaridou, C. (2014). To
CLIL or Not to CLIL? The Case of the 3rd Experimental Primary School in
Evosmos. In N. Lavidas, T. Alexiou, & A-M. Sougari (Eds.), Major
Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, pp.
3, 215–234.
Morton, T. (2020). Cognitive
discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in
CLIL. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural
Education, 3(1), 7–17.
Muñoz, C., Cadierno, T., & Casas, I. (2018). Different
Starting Points for English Language Learning: A Comparative Study of Danish and Spanish Young Learners: Different Starting
Points. Language
Learning, 68(4), 1076–1109.
Nashaat-Sobhy, N. (2018). Pragmatics
in CLIL: A comparison of CLIL and non-CLIL students’ requests. Revista Española de Lingüística
Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 31(2), 467–494.
Nightingale, R. (2016). The
effect of out-of-school media contact on language attitudes in multilingual adolescents: A complex psychosociolinguistic
system [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitat Jaume I.
Pérez, M. C., & Basse, R. (2015). Analysing
Errors of CLIL and non-CLIL Primary School Students in their Written and Oral Productions: A Comparative
Study. Procedia — Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 1731, 11–17.
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vallbona, A. (2016). CLIL
in minimal input contexts: A longitudinal study of primary school learners’ receptive
skills. System, 581, 37–48.
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2010). Written
production and CLIL: An empirical study. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), AILA
Applied Linguistics
Series (pp. 191–210). John Benjamins.
Rumlich, D. (2020). Bilingual
education in monolingual contexts: a comparative perspective. The Language Learning
Journal, 48(1), 115–119.
San Isidro, X., & Lasagabaster, D. (2018). The
impact of CLIL on pluriliteracy development and content learning in a rural multilingual setting: A longitudinal
study. Language Teaching
Research, 23(5), 584–602.
Strobl, C., & Baten, K. (2021). Writing
development during study abroad: The role of language contact and social networks. Study Abroad
Research in Second Language Acquisition and International
Education, 6(1), 124–162.
Somers, T., & Llinares, A. (2021). Students’
motivation for content and language integrated learning and the role of programme
intensity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 24(6), 839–854.
Soto-Corominas, A., Roquet, H., & Segura, M. (2024). The
effects of CLIL and sources of individual differences on receptive and productive EFL skills at the onset of primary
school. Applied
linguistics, 45(2), 364–382.
Sundqvist, P., & Nilsson, R. (2024). Integrating
commercial-off-the-shelf games in L2 English vocabulary
instruction. In Technology and English Language Teaching in a
Changing World: A Practical Guide for Teachers and Teacher
Educators (pp. 3–15). Cham.
Sundqvist, P. (2024). Extramural
English as an individual difference variable in L2 research: Methodology matters. Annual Review
of Applied Linguistics, 1–13.
Sundqvist, P., & Uztosun, M. S. (2024). Extramural
English in Scandinavia and Asia: Scale development, learner engagement, and perceived speaking
ability. TESOL
Quarterly, 58(4), 1638–1665.