Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education: Online-First Articles
Examining L1 ability in a Finnish secondary education context
A comparison of CLIL and non-CLIL students’ oral production
Published online: 14 April 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24016.lau
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24016.lau
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between L1 ability and CLIL in a lower secondary education context in
Finland. In the study, 31 participants responded to a verbal fluency task, a picture-naming task and a survey comprising L1
self-evaluation questions. The results were analysed quantitatively in light of additional variables such as socioeconomic status
and L1 grades. The CLIL students outperformed the non-CLIL students in the verbal fluency task, whereas the results of the
picture-naming task were not suggestive of group-level differences. Additionally, the CLIL students’ picture-naming task results
were less reflective of within-group differences than those of the non-CLIL students. This study sheds light on the relationship
between CLIL and L1 ability, while highlighting the possible role of CLIL in mitigating the impact of individual differences on L1
ability.
Keywords: CLIL, L1, socioeconomic status, psycholinguistics, verbal fluency, picture-naming
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.CLIL, bilingualism, and L1: Bilingual advantages and costs in CLIL students
- 3.Ability to access and retrieve lexis in bilinguals
- 4.Factors related to L1 ability in bilingual education
- 5.Methods
- 5.1Participants
- 5.2Data collection and analysis
- 6.Results
- 6.1The relationship between L1 self-evaluations and academic achievement
- 6.2Performance in the verbal fluency task
- 6.3Performance in the picture-naming task
- 6.4Picture-based analysis of naming task results
- 6.5Correlation analysis for both tasks
- 7.Discussion and conclusions
References
References (63)
Antoniou, M., Liang, E., Ettlinger, M., & Wong, P. C. M. (2015). The
bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism (Cambridge,
England), 18(4), 683–695.
Arens, A. K., & Jansen, M. (2016). Self-concepts
in reading, writing, listening, and speaking: A multidimensional and hierarchical structure and its generalizability across
native and foreign languages. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 108(5), 646–664.
Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic
Status, School Quality, and National Economic Development: A Cross-National Analysis of the “Heyneman-Loxley Effect” on
Mathematics and Science Achievement. Comparative Education
Review, 46(3), 291–312.
Baus, C., Costa, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). On
the effects of second language immersion on first language production. Acta
Psychologica, 142(3), 402–409.
Białecka, M., Wodniecka, Z., Muszyńska, K., Szpak, M., & Haman, E. (2023). Both
L1 and L2 proficiency impact ToM reasoning in children aged 4 to 6. Painting a more nuanced picture of the relation between
bilingualism and ToM. Bilingualism (Cambridge,
England), 1–19.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism:
consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 16(4), 240–250.
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2011). Bilingualism
influences inhibitory control in auditory
comprehension. Cognition, 118(2), 245–257.
Bruton, A. (2011). Is
CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the
research. System, 39(4), 523–532.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical
analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied
Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262,
City Digital Group (2021). Suomi24
virkkeet -korpus 2001–2020, Korp-versio
[korpus]. Kielipankki. Retrieved from: [URL]
Council of the European
Union (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for
lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance) (2018/C 189/01). Retrieved
from [URL]
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL:
Content and language integrated
learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cucina, J. M., Peyton, S. T., Su, C., & Byle, K. A. (2016). Role
of mental abilities and mental tests in explaining high-school grades. Intelligence
(Norwood), 541, 90–104.
Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence
and educational achievement. Intelligence
(Norwood), 35(1), 13–21.
European Commission (1995). White paper
on education and training: Teaching and learning — towards the learning society. Retrieved
from [URL]
European Parliament & Council of the European
Union (1998). Council resolution of 20 November 1997 on a European year of
languages (1998). Retrieved from [URL]
Faroqi-Shah, Y., Kevas, Y., & Li, R. (2021). Lexical
category differences in bilingual picture naming: Implications for models of lexical
representation. Bilingualism (Cambridge,
England), 24(5), 849–863.
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES
differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental
Science, 16(2), 234–248.
Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., Fernández-Costales, A., & Arias Blanco, J. M. (2019). Analysing
students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: Empirical evidence from
Spain. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 22(6), 661–674.
Finnish National Agency for
Education. (n.d.). Evaluation of students’ learning and competence and the
criteria for final assessment. [URL]
Friedrich, T. S., & Schütz, A. (2023). Predicting
school grades: Can conscientiousness compensate for intelligence? Journal of
Intelligence, 11(7), 146-.
Genesee, F., & Fortune, T. (2014). Bilingual
education and at-risk students. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language
Education, 2(2), 196–209.
Gollan, T. H., & Goldrick, M. (2016). Grammatical
constraints on language switching: Language control is not just executive control. Journal of
Memory and
Language, 901, 177–199.
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More
use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links
hypothesis. Journal of Memory and
Language, 58(3), 787–814.
Haman, E., Wodniecka, Z., Marecka, M., Szewczyk, J., Białecka-Pikul, M., Otwinowska, A., … Foryś-Nogala, M. (2017). How
does L1 and L2 exposure impact L1 performance in bilingual children? Evidence from Polish-English migrants to the United
Kingdom. Frontiers in
Psychology, 81, 1444–1444.
Holmberg, P. (2019). The
development of academic vocabulary in Swedish. In L. Sylvén (Ed.), Investigating
Content and Language Integrated Learning: Insights from Swedish High
Schools (pp. 173–186). Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Multilingual Matters.
Itoi, K. (2024). Fostering
Inclusive Learning and 21st-Century Skills: Creating Translanguaging Spaces in University Content and Language Integrated
Learning Courses. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does
bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta
Psychologica, 127(2), 277–288.
Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M. A., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2007). The
genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school
years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 72(3), 1–144.
Kuncel, N. R., & Hezlett, S. A. (2010). Fact
and fiction in cognitive ability testing for admissions and hiring decisions. Current
Directions in Psychological
Science, 19(6), 339–345.
Launonen, P., Roiha, A., & Maijala, M. (2024). Exploring
the Relationship between CLIL and L1 Ability in Finland: Analyzing Written and Oral
Production. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated
Learning, 15(2), 1–30.
Lauermann, F., Meißner, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2020). Relative
importance of intelligence and ability self-concept in predicting test performance and school grades in the math and language
arts domains. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 112(2), 364–383.
Lecheile, B. M., Spinrad, T. L., Xu, X., Lopez, J., & Eisenberg, N. (2020). Longitudinal
relations among household chaos, SES, and effortful control in the prediction of language skills in early
childhood. Developmental
Psychology, 56(4), 727–738.
Levie, R., Ben-Zvi, G., & Ravid, D. (2017). Morpho-lexical
development in language impaired and typically developing Hebrew-speaking children from two SES
backgrounds. Reading &
Writing, 30(5), 1035–1064.
Lim Falk, M. (2019). The
development of linguistic correctness in CLIL and non-CLIL students’ writing in the L1 at upper secondary
school. In L. Sylvén (Ed.), Investigating
Content and Language Integrated Learning : Insights from Swedish High
Schools (pp. 187–215). Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Multilingual Matters.
Lindstromberg, S. (2016). Inferential
statistics in language teaching research: A review and ways forward. Language Teaching
Research:
LTR, 20(6), 741–768.
Lorenzo, F., Granados, A., & Rico, N. (2021). Equity
in bilingual education: Socioeconomic status and content and language integrated learning in monolingual southern
Europe. Applied
Linguistics, 42(3), 393–413.
Łuniewska, M., Haman, E., Armon-Lotem, S., Etenkowski, B., Southwood, F., Anđelković, D., … Ünal-Logacev, Ö. (2016). Ratings
of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of
words? Behavior Research
Methods, 48(3), 1154–1177.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The
language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and
multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing
Research, 50(4), 940–967.
Merisuo-Storm, T. (2007). Pupils’
attitudes towards foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual
education. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 23(2), 226–235.
Nikitina, L., Paidi, R., & Furuoka, F. (2019). Using
bootstrapped quantile regression analysis for small sample research in applied linguistics: Some methodological
considerations. PloS
One, 14(1), e0210668–e0210668.
Nikula, T., & Mård-Miettinen, K. (2014). Language
learning in immersion and CLIL classrooms. In J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren (Eds.) Handbook
of
pragmatics, 181. 2014 Installment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nishimoto, T., Miyawaki, K., Ueda, T., Une, Y., & Takahashi, M. (2005). Japanese
normative set of 359 pictures. Behavior Research
Methods, 37(3), 398–416.
Ohlsson, E. (2021). Perspectives
on written L1 in Swedish CLIL education. Apples (Jyväskylä,
Finland), 15(2).
Paap, K. R., Myuz, H. A., Anders, R. T., Bockelman, M. F., Mikulinsky, R., & Sawi, O. M. (2017). No
compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch
cost. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Hove,
England), 29(2), 89–112.
Pavón Vázquez, V. (2018). Learning
outcomes in CLIL programmes: A comparison of results between urban and rural
environments. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de Las Lenguas
Extranjeras, 291, 9–28.
Pérez Cañado, M. (2012). CLIL
research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341.
(2018). The
effects of CLIL on L1 and content learning: Updated empirical evidence from monolingual
contexts. Learning and
Instruction, 571, 18–33.
Petrill, S. A., Deater-Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., De Thorne, L. S., & Schatschneider, C. (2006). Reading
skills in early readers: Genetic and shared environmental Influences. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 39(1), 48–55.
Rascón Moreno, D. (2018). Socioeconomic
Status and its Impact on Language and Content Attainment in CLIL Contexts. Porta Linguarum
Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de Las Lenguas
Extranjeras, 291, 115–135.
Rojczyk, A. (2018). Time-limited
verbal fluency task with Polish−English unbalanced
bilinguals. In Individual Learner Differences in
SLA (pp. 210–225). Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.
Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting
Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object
recognition. Perception
(London), 33(2), 217–236.
Roth, B., Becker, N., Romeyke, S., Schäfer, S., Domnick, F., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Intelligence
and school grades: A meta-analysis. Intelligence
(Norwood), 531, 118–137.
Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Magnuson, J. S., Alario, F., & Costa, A. (2016). Breaking
down the bilingual cost in speech production. Cognitive
Science, 40(8), 1911–1940.
San Isidro, X., & Lasagabaster, D. (2019). The
impact of CLIL on pluriliteracy development and content learning in a rural multilingual setting: A longitudinal
study. Language Teaching
Research, 23(5), 584–602.
Shao, Z., Janse, E., Visser, K., & Meyer, A. S. (2014). What
do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older
adults. Frontiers in
Psychology, 51, 772–772.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A
standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual
complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and
Memory, 6(2), 174.
Tabari, F. (2021). Lexicon
on board: A MEG study based on expressive picture-naming. East European Journal of
Psycholinguistics, 8(2), 233–254.
Torrance, M., Nottbusch, G., Alves, R. A., Arfé, B., Chanquoy, L., Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., … Wengelin, Å. (2018). Timed
written picture naming in 14 European languages. Behavior Research
Methods, 50(2), 744–758.
Turner, M. (2013). Content-based
Japanese Language Teaching in Australian Schools: Is CLIL a Good Fit? Japanese
Studies, 33(3), 315–330.
Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The
integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven
teachers. Language, Culture, and
Curriculum, 35(1), 36–50.