Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 13:2 (2025) ► pp.193–215
Content and language integrated learning in Kazakhstan
A scoping review
Published online: 11 June 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.23034.sat
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.23034.sat
This study is a scoping review of research conducted on Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in
Kazakhstan. A total of 26 studies were selected, including journal articles and master’s theses. The selected studies were
thematically analyzed to identify key aspects and shared aspects. Three main thematically organized areas for CLIL research
emerged from the reviewed studies: (1) Dominant perceptions and beliefs about CLIL, (2) Positive outcomes and challenges in CLIL,
and (3) CLIL pedagogy and methodology. The majority of the reviewed studies primarily focused on students’ English language
skills, investigated the affective and cognitive experience of CLIL, and addressed challenges, practices, and concerns related to
CLIL. These themes capture the current landscape of CLIL research in Kazakhstan and contribute to a more holistic understanding of
CLIL’s impact on language acquisition and educational practices, thereby informing approaches to language education in
Kazakhstan’s trilingual education system.
Keywords: CLIL, Kazakhstan, thematic analysis, trilingual education
Article outline
- Introduction
- CLIL beyond Europe
- Methods
- Search strategies and inclusion criteria
- Data analysis
- Findings
- Key characteristics of the reviewed studies
- Main concerns regarding CLIL education in Kazakhstan
- Dominant perceptions and beliefs about CLIL
- Students’ perceptions
- Teachers’ perceptions
- Positive outcomes and challenges in CLIL
- Positive outcomes of CLIL education
- Challenges in CLIL education
- CLIL pedagogy and methodology
- CLIL teachers’ practices in primary and secondary education
- Implementing CLIL in tertiary education
- Dominant perceptions and beliefs about CLIL
- Discussion
- Conclusions
- Competing interests
References
References (64)
Aburizaizah, S. (April, 2013). Introducing
content and language-integrated learning at a Saudi Arabian
university. In R. Wilkinson & M. L. Walsh (Eds.), Integrating
content and language in higher education: From theory to practice – Selected papers from the 2013 ICLHE
Conference (pp. 101–116). Peter Lang.
Akbarov, A., Gönen, K., & Aydogan, H. (2018). Content
and (English) Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) applied to math lessons. Acta Didactica
Napocensia, 11(2), 1–10.
Arynova, A. B., Kasymbekova, D. A., & Korganbayeva, Z. K. (2020). Presenting
lecture materials in English using CLIL technologies. Bulletin of Karaganda University.
Chemistry
Series, 21, 105–112.
Banegas, D. (2022). Research
into practice: CLIL in South America. Language
Teaching, 55(3), 379–391.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using
thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in
psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cao, Y. (2021). Exploring
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) teaching materials in Chinese universities: Teachers’ and students’
perceptions and reflections. International Journal of English and
Literature, 12(3), 23–32.
Chumbay, J., & Ochoa, J. F. Q. (2020). Language-driven
CLIL: Developing written production at the secondary school level. English Language
Teaching, 13(8), 74–90.
Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL:
Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language
Integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 311, 182–204.
(2013). A
construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualizing content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual
education. European Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253.
DeBoer, M., & Leontjev, D. (2020). Assessment
and learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Springer International Publishing.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL
and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The language learning
journal, 42(2), 209–224.
Dontsov, A. S., & Burdina, E. I. (2018). Educating
teachers for content and language integrated learning in Kazakhstan: Developing positive
attitudes. Problems of Education in the 21st
Century, 76(2), 140–158.
Em, A. (2021). Attending
to diversity and inclusion through content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in Kazakhstan: Teachers’ experiences and
practices in diverse CLIL classrooms [Master’s thesis, Nazarbayev University]. Nazarbayev University Repository. [URL]
Golovchun, A., Karimova, B., Zhunissova, M., Ospankulova, G., & Mukhamadi, K. (2017). Content
and Language Integrated Learning in terms of multilingualism: Kazakhstani experience. Astra
Salvensis, 101, 297–306.
Harrop, E. (2012). Content
and language integrated learning (CLIL): Limitations and
possibilities. Encuentro, 211, 57–70.
Hu, H., Mohd Said, N. E., & Hashim, H. (2023). Sustaining
Content and Language Integrated Learning in China: A systematic
review. Sustainability, 15(5), Article
3894.
Huertas Abril, C. A., & Shashken, A. (2021). Exploring
the potential of CLIL in Kazakhstan: A qualitative study. Revista complutense de
educación, 32(2), 261–271.
Kakenov, R. (2017). Teachers’
experiences of using CLIL in Kazakh language classrooms. NUGSE Research in
Education, 2(2), 21–29. Retrieved
from [URL]
Kao, Y. T. (2022). Understanding
and addressing the challenges of teaching an online CLIL course: A teacher education
study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 25(2), 656–675.
Karabassova, L. (2018). Teachers’
conceptualization of content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Evidence from a trilingual
context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 21(7), 1–13.
(2020). Understanding
trilingual education reform in Kazakhstan: Why is it
Stalled?. In D. Egéa (Ed.), Education
in Central Asia: Education, equity,
economy (pp. 37–51). Springer.
(2022a). Teachers’
conceptualization of content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Evidence from a trilingual
context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 25(3), 787–799.
(2022b). Is
top-down CLIL justified? A grounded theory exploration of secondary school Science teachers’
experiences. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 25(4), 1530–1545.
Karabassova, L., & San Isidro, X. (2020). Towards
translanguaging in CLIL: A study on teachers’ perceptions and practices in
Kazakhstan. International Journal of
Multilingualism, 20(2), 556–575.
Kewara, P., & Prabjandee, D. (2018). CLIL
teacher professional development for content teachers in Thailand. Iranian Journal of Language
Teaching
Research, 6(1), 93–108.
King, M. (2018). Content
and language integrated learning (CLIL). The TESOL Encyclopedia of English language
teaching, 1–6.
Konyssova, A., Atemova, K., Chakanova, S., Gulmira, A., Konyssova, S., & Konkabayeva, G. (2022). Experience
of CLIL in the natural science disciplines in Kazakhstan’s schools. Cypriot Journal of
Educational
Sciences, 17(5), 1588–1602.
Kydyrbayeva, G., Stambekova, A., Svetlana, U., Gulsim, N., & Gulvira, M. (2021). Preparing
future primary school teachers for trilingual teaching with CLIL technology. World Journal on
Educational
Technology, 13(4), 617–634.
Kuzembayeva, G., Umarova, A., Maydangalieva, Z., Gorbatenko, O., Kalashnikova, E., Kalmazova, N., & Chigisheva, O. (2022). Content
and language integrated learning practices in Kazakhstan secondary schools during COVID-19
pandemic. Contemporary Educational
Technology, 14(2), Article
ep362.
Lasagabaster, D. & Beloqui, R. L. (2015). The
impact of type of approach (CLIL versus EFL) and methodology (book-based versus project work) on
motivation. Porta
Linguarum, 231, 41–57.
Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion
and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT
Journal, 64(4), 367–375.
Lo, Y. Y., Lin, A. M., & Cheung, T. C. L. (2018). Supporting
English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) learners’ science literacy development in CLIL: A genre-based
approach. In K. S. Tang & K. Danielsson (Eds.), Global
developments in literacy research for science
education (pp. 79–95). Springer.
Lo, Y., & Lin, A. (2015). Designing
multilingual and multimodal CLIL frameworks for EFL students. International Journal of
Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 18(3), 261–269.
Lopriore, L. (2020). Reframing
teaching knowledge in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): A European
perspective. Language Teaching
Research, 24(1), 94–104.
Mahan, K. R. (2022). The
comprehending teacher: Scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The
Language Learning
Journal, 50(1), 74–88.
Martín de Lama, M. T. (2015). Making
the match between content and foreign language: A case study on university students’ opinions towards
CLIL. Higher Learning Research
Communications, 5(1), 29–46.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering
CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning in bilingual and multilingual
education. Macmillan Education.
Mehisto, P., Winter, L., Kambatyrova, A., & Kurakbayev, K. (2022). CLIL
as a conduit for a trilingual Kazakhstan. The Language Learning
Journal, 51(6), 691–705.
Metli, A., & Akıs, D. (2022). Challenges
and strategies on the Content and Language Integrated Learning approach (CLIL): A case study from the Turkish
context. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated
Learning, 15(1), e1514–e1514.
Mahon, D., & Murphy, D. (2019). Do
students develop the way universities say they do? Staff perceptions of student development of graduate attributes in the
context of a transnational partnership in Kazakhstan. The European Educational
Researcher, 2(2), 145–164.
Maximova, G. (2020). STEM
teachers’ perceptions about pre-service training and their challenges in CLIL classrooms in
Kazakhstan [Master’s thesis, Nazarbayev University]. Nazarbayev University Repository. [URL]
Milla, R., & Martínez, A. A. (2023). CLIL
teachers’ beliefs and practices: How can teacher training
help? In J. L. Estrada Chichón & F. Zayas Martínez (Eds.), Handbook
of research on training teachers for bilingual education in primary
schools (pp. 129–154). IGI Global.
Nariman, S., Alzhanov, A., & Doguchaeva, S. (2021). Teaching
the CLIL technology to rising IT teachers. Interactive Learning
Environments, 31(9), 5601–5613.
Nchindila, B. (2017). Investigating
benefits of mother tongue instruction in multilingual Africa: The role of Content and Language Integrated
Learning. Journal for Language
Teaching, 51(2), 11–33.
Nurdillayeva, R. N., & Zhuman, G. O. (2021). Application
of the CLIL method in the classes of Inorganic Chemistry. Bulletin of Karaganda University.
Chemistry
Series, 2(102), 96–104.
Omarbekova, G. (2020). Content
and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) as an effective approach for teaching Kazakh language at the University
level. Retrieved from [URL]
Parra, M. E. G., & Abdiyeva, A. (2021). Trilingual
education in Kazakhstan: A qualitative study. Revista de
Humanidades, 451, 31–53.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2023). What’s
hot and what’s not on the current CLIL research agenda: Weeding out the non-issues from the real issues. A response to Bruton
(2019). Applied Linguistics
Review, 14(2), 347–367.
Roiha, A. S. (2014). Teachers’
views on differentiation in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Perceptions, practices and
challenges. Language and
Education, 28(1), 1–18.
Satayev, M., Balta, N., Shaymerdenovna, I. R., Fernández-Cézar, R., & Alcaraz-Mármol, G. (2022). Content
and language integrated learning implementation through team teaching in biology lessons: A quasi-experimental design with
university students. Frontiers in
Education, 7(867447).
Satayev, M., Barrios, E., Fernandez-Costales, A., Agaidarova, S., Izbassarova, R., & Balta, N. (2022). The
effect of CLIL combined with language instruction on language learning and the role of individual and institutional factors in
students’ perspectives: Empirical evidence from Kazakhstan. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,
Science and Technology
Education, 18(10), em2160.
Shabdenova, N. (2021). Analysis
of CLIL practices in a secondary school in Astana [Master’s
thesis, Nazarbayev University]. Nazarbayev University Repository. [URL]
Smagulova, B. G., Tussupbekova, M., Zagatova, S. B., Kazhikenova, N. K., & Zhamankozova, A. T. (2019). CLIL
approach to overcome language acquisition barrier of non-linguistic specialty
students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and
Change, 8(6), 1–12.
Shraiber, E. G., & Ovinova, L. N. (2017). CLIL
technology as an innovative method to learn foreign languages at university. Bulletin of the
South Ural State University. Series: Education. Pedagogical
Sciences, 9(2), 82–88.
Turner, M. (2013). CLIL
in Australia: The importance of context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 16(4), 395–410.
Vitchenko, O. (2017). Introducing
CLIL in Kazakhstan: Researching beliefs and perceptions of university stakeholders. Electronic
Journal of Foreign Language
Teaching, 14(1), 102–116.
Wilkinson, R. (2018). Content
and language integration at universities? Collaborative reflections. International Journal of
Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 21(5), 607–615.
Wei, R., & J. Feng. (2015). Implementing
CLIL for young learners in an EFL context beyond Europe: Grassroots support and language policy in
China. English
Today, 31(1), 55–60.
Wolff, D. (2003). Content
and language integrated learning: a framework for the development of learner
autonomy. In D. Little, J. Ridley, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner
autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner, curriculum and
assessment (pp. 198–210). Authentik Language Learning Resources Ltd.
Valdés-Sánchez, L., & Espinet, M. (2020). Coteaching
in a science-CLIL classroom: Changes in discursive interaction as evidence of an English teacher’s science-CLIL professional
identity development. International Journal of Science
Education, 42(14), 2426–2452.
Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J. (2022). The
integration of content and language in CLIL: A challenge for content-driven and language-driven
teachers. Language, Culture and
Curriculum, 35(1), 36–50.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Lee, Hansol, Heath Rose, Ernesto Macaro & Jang Ho Lee
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
