Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 11:2 (2023) ► pp.255–282
Swedish immersion in Finland and Swedish as a second-language subject in Sweden
Teacher perspectives from two primary schools
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Stockholm University.
Published online: 12 September 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21032.hed
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21032.hed
Abstract
Based on fieldwork and interviews, we explore five teachers’ views about their teaching of Swedish as a second language in an early immersion school in Finland (Larch) and a linguistically heterogeneous primary school in Sweden (Chestnut). Drawing from ecological perspectives, we aim to contribute new knowledge on how second language teachers express their goals, teacher experiences and expertise depending on language and education policy as discursive-material reality. We discuss how societal, discursive and material differences were entangled with the teachers’ discourses, for example, the fact that Swedish immersion at Larch enjoyed a higher social status than Swedish as a second language at Chestnut. Concomitantly, the teachers adhered to pedagogical principles and the value of students’ linguistic and cultural repertoires in similar ways. We specifically discuss teacher autonomy as entwined with prevailing discursive-material realities, including distinct language education policies.
Abstrakt
Baserat på fältarbete och intervjuer undersöker vi fem lärares syn på sin undervisning i svenska som andraspråk i ett språkbadsprogram i en grundskola i Finland (Larch) och en språkligt heterogen grundskola i Sverige (Chestnut). Utifrån ekologiska perspektiv vill vi bidra med ny kunskap om hur andraspråkslärare uttrycker sina mål, lärarerfarenheter och expertis utifrån rådande språk- och utbildningspolicy, vilka vi analyserar som diskursiv och materiell realitet. Vi diskuterar hur samhälleliga, diskursiva och materiella olikheter var invävda i lärarnas diskurser, såsom det faktum att svenskt språkbad vid Larch hade högre social status än svenska som andraspråk vid Chestnut. Samtidigt värderade lärarna såväl pedagogiska principer som elevernas språkliga och kulturella repertoarer på liknande sätt. Vi diskuterar specifikt lärarautonomi som sammanflätad med rådande diskurser och materiella realiteter, inklusive olika språkutbildningspolicyer.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Language educational policies in Finland
- 1.2Language education policies in Sweden
- 2.Theoretical points of departure
- 2.1Language teaching approaches for learners of additional languages
- 2.2The multilayeredness of language (education) policy
- 2.3The study of the classroom as an unbounded system
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Main objectives and rationale for teaching Swedish as a second language at Larch
- 4.2Main objectives and rationale for teaching Swedish as a second language at Chestnut
- 4.3Summary of expressed objectives and rationale
- 4.4Multilingual language practices at Larch
- 4.5Multilingual language practices at Chestnut
- 4.6Summary of multilingual language practices
- 5.Concluding discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (45)
Baker, C., & Wright, W. E. (2021). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Multilingual Matters.
Björklund, S., Mård-Miettinen, K., & Savijärvi, M. (2014). Swedish immersion in the early years in Finland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(2), 197–214.
Boyd, S., & Palviainen, Å. (2015). Building walls or bridges? A language ideological debate about bilingual schools in Finland. In M. Halonen, P. Ihalainen & T. Saarinen (Eds.), Language policies in Finland and Sweden: Interdisciplinary and multi-sited comparisons (pp. 57–89). Multilingual Matters.
Canagarajah, S., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). Introduction: Scales analysis, and its uses and prospects in educational linguistics, Linguistics & Education, 341, 1–10.
Canagarajah, S. (2021). Materializing narratives: The story behind the story. System, 102(102610), 1–10.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Linguistic ethnography: collecting, analyzing and presenting data. Sage.
Cummins, J. (2017). Teaching minoritized students: Are additive approaches legitimate? Harvard Education Review, 87(3), 404–425.
Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (2014). Bilingualism in education. Aspects of theory, research and practice. Routledge.
De Fina, A. (2019). The interview as an interactional event. In P. Patrick, M. Schmid & K. Zwaan, (Eds.), Language analysis for the determination of origin (pp. 21–40). Springer.
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. (Publications 2016:5). Finnish National Agency for Education
Ganuza, N., & Hedman, C. (2015). Struggles for legitimacy in mother tongue instruction in Sweden. Language and Education, 29(2), 125–139.
Harju-Luukkainen, H., & Stolt, S. (2016). Språkbadet är vägen till funktionell tvåspråkighet i Finland. [Immersion is the road to functional bilingualism]. Kognition & Pædagogik, 16(99), 68–77.
Hedman, C., & Magnusson, U. (2021a). Researching the complexities of the school subject Swedish as a second language: A linguistic ethnographic project in four schools. Languages, 6(4), article id 205.
(2021b). Introductory classes for newcomer primary school students in Sweden. Pedagogical principles and emotional understanding. Multicultural Education Review, 13(1), 85–105.
(2023). Adjusting to linguistic diversity in a primary school through relational agency and expertise: A mother-tongue teacher team’s perspective. Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 42(1), 139–164.
Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., & Pujolar, J. (2018). Critical sociolinguistic research methods: Studying language issues that matter. Routledge
Hudson, B. (2002). Holding complexity and searching for meaning – teaching as reflective practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 43–57.
Hult, F. M., & S. Pietikäinen. (2014). Shaping discourses of multilingualism through a language ideological debate: The case of Swedish in Finland. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(1), 1–20.
Mitchell, J. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). Academic Press.
Mård-Miettinen, K., Arnott, S., & Vignola, M. (2022). Early immersion in minority language contexts: Canada and Finland. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Handbook of early language education (pp. 347–371). Springer.
Mård-Miettinen, K., & Björklund, S. (2019). “In one sentence there can easily be three languages”. A glimpse into the use of languages among immersion students. In A. Huhta, G. Erickson & N. Figueras (Eds.), Developments in language education. A memorial volume in honour of Sauli Takala (pp. 239–249). EALTA & University of Jyväskylä.
Parkvall, M. (2019). Det nya Sverige: språken. Den nya mångfalden. [The new Sweden: languages. The new pluralism.] Riksbankens jubileumsfond.
Pakarinen, S. (2020). Språkbadselevskap i Finland och på Irland: En studie om språkpolicy och två- och flerspråkighet i skollandskap och hos elever i tidigt fullständigt svenskt och iriskt språkbad. [Language immersion in Finland and Ireland]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä].
Prasad, G., & Lory, M.-P. (2020). Linguistic and cultural collaboration in schools: Reconciling majority and minoritized language users. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 797–822.
Salo, O. P. (2012). Finland’s official bilingualism – a bed of roses or of Procrustes? In J. Blom-maert, S. Leppanen, P. Pahta, & T. Raisanen (Eds.), Dangerous multilingualism. Northern perspectives on order, purity and normality (pp. 25–40). Palgrave Macmillan.
Schleppegrell, M. (2016). Systemic Functional Grammar in the K–12 classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 384–396). Routledge.
Sellgren, M. (2011). Den dubbla uppgiften. [The twofold task]. [Lic. dissertation, Stockholm University]. Stockholm.
Sjöberg, S., Mård-Miettinen, K., Peltoniemi, A., & Skinnari, K. (2018). Språkbad i Finlands kommuner 2017: Utredning om språkbad i de inhemska språken i småbarnspedagogik, förskoleundervisning och grundläggande utbildning. [Language immersion in Finnish municipalities 2017]. University of Jyväskylä. [URL]
Spolsky, B., Inbar-Lourie, O., & Tannenbaum, M. (2014). Challenges for language education and policy. Routledge.
Sundman, M. (2013). Tvåspråkiga skolor? En analys av fördelar och risker med införandet av skolor med svenska och finska som undervisningsspråk. [An analysis of advantages and risks in Swedish/Finnish medium schools]. Magma studie, 41, 1–90.
Swedish National Agency for Education (2011). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011, Reviderad 2019 [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre 2011, Revised 2019]. Skolverket.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2005). The evolving sociopolitical context of immersion education in Canada: some implications for program development. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 169–186.
Tavakoli, P., & Jones, R. (2018). An overview of approaches to second language acquisition and instructional practices. Welsh Government report number 12/2018.
Tedick, D. J., & Lyster, R. (2020). Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Routledge.
Thamarana, S., & Andhra Pradesh, V. (2015). A critical overview of communicative language teaching. IJELLH – International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities, III(V), 90–100.
Uddling, J. (2019). Textsamtalets möjligheter och begränsningar i språkligt heterogena klass-rum. [Affordances and constraints of text talks in linguistically heterogeneous classrooms]. [Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University].
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer Academic.
(2008). Ecological-semiotic perspectives on educational linguistics. In B. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 596–605). Blackwell.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
