Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 12:1 (2024) ► pp.101–124

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A scoping review of the literature on content and language integrated learning assessment

ORCiD logo with link | City University of Macau
 | City University of Macau
Published online: 2 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21025.lia
Abstract
Despite being an essential element of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), CLIL assessment has received scarce research attention and remains a relatively underexplored area. Since few review studies have been conducted in the field of CLIL assessment, this article constitutes the first attempt to synthesise both theoretical and empirical studies on CLIL assessment around the globe with a view to yielding implications for the understanding, design, and improvement of assessment in CLIL and providing suggestions for future research agendas. Based on a thematic analysis of 77 pertinent publications selected among 763 search results, this scoping review first identified three prominent research themes in CLIL assessment including assessment issues, assessment practices, and assessment frameworks. Subsequently, the review elaborated each theme and discussed some interesting patterns of the literature in great depth. The review concluded with suggestions on future research directions with a view to advancing the uncharted area of CLIL assessment.
摘要
尽管在内容与语言整合学习中具备关键地位，但内容与语言整合学习评估受到的研究关注有限，仍然是一个相对未被充分探索的领域。由于在内容与语言整合学习评估领域中鲜有综述性研究，本文首次试图综合全球范围内关于内容与语言整合学习评估的理论和实证研究，旨在为理解、设计和改进内容与语言整合学习评估提供启示，并为未来研究议程提供建议。基于对763个搜索结果中筛选出的77篇相关文献的主题分析，本范围性综述首先识别了内容与语言整合学习评估中的三个突出研究主题，包括评估问题、评估实践和评估框架。随后，综述详细阐述了每个主题，并深入讨论了文献中的一些有趣模式。综述最后提出了未来研究方向的建议，以推进未被探索的内容与语言整合学习评估领域。
Article outline
  • 1.Significance of the review
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Selecting the studies
    • 2.2Thematic analysis
  • 3.Findings
    • 3.1Main issues of CLIL assessment
    • 3.2CLIL assessment practices
    • 3.3Conceptual frameworks for CLIL assessment
  • 4.Discussion and implications
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • References
References (54)
References
Aguilar, M., & Rodríguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183–197. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbero, T. (2009). Assessment in CLIL. In H. Järvinen (Ed.), Language in content instruction (pp. 108–118). University of Turku.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Assessment tools and practices in CLIL. In F. Quartapelle (Ed.), Assessment and evaluation in CLIL (pp. 38–56). Ibis. [URL]
Kandlbinder, P. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA News, 36(3), 5–6. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coonan, C. M. (2011). CLIL in (language) teacher training. Studi di glottodidattica, 5(2), 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The foreign language curriculum and CLIL. Synergies Italie, 81, 117–128. [URL]
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Czura, A., & Papaja, K. (2010). Classroom-based and external assessment in CLIL. Anglica Wratislaviensia, 481, 163–170. [URL]
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De la Barra, E., Veloso, S., & Maluenda, L. (2018). Integrating assessment in a CLIL-based approach for second-year university students. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(2), 111–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuentes, M. À. (2013). Which score is adequate: Approximation to the assessment rationale used in a Science through English CLIL written test. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(4), 54–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gablasova, D. (2014). Issues in the assessment of bilingually educated students: Expressing subject knowledge through L1 and L2. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 151–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graves, K., & Garton, S. (2017). An analysis of three curriculum approaches to teaching English in public-sector schools. Language Teaching, 50(4), 441–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmannová, M., Novotná, J., & Pípalová, R. (2004). Assessment instruments for classes integrating mathematics and foreign language teaching. ICME, 101, 1–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hönig, I. (2009). Assessment in CLIL [Doctoral dissertation, Universität Wien]. [URL]
(2010). Assessment in CLIL: Theoretical and empirical research. VDM Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Julián-de-Vega, C., & Fonseca-Mora, M. C. (2017). Language policy and teacher team coordination practices in secondary CLIL schools. European Journal of Language Policy, 9(2), 183–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiely, R. (2009). CLIL – The question of assessment. Retrieved August 22, 2023, from [URL]
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 11, 30–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leal, J. P. (2016). Assessment in CLIL: Test development for content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 293–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lo, Y. Y. (2014). Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC Journal, 45(2), 181–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lo, Y. Y., & Fung, D. (2020). Assessments in CLIL: The interplay between cognitive and linguistic demands and their progression in secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(10), 1192–1210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2014). Designing assessment tasks with language awareness: Balancing cognitive and linguistic demands. Assessment and Learning, 3(3), 97–119. [URL]
Lo, Y. Y., Lui, W. M., & Wong, M. (2019). Scaffolding for cognitive and linguistic challenges in CLIL science assessments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 289–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Londo, M. (2012). Optimising EMI in higher education through CLIL: Case study at Vienna University of Technology. AV Akademikerverlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A. K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL classrooms. Languages Open Doors.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín-Macho Harrison, A., & Faya Cerqueiro, F. (2020). L1 in CLIL: The case of Castilla-La Mancha. TEJUELO. Didactics of Language and Literature. Education, 311, 143–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massler, U. (2011). Assessment in CLIL learning. In S. Ioannou-Georgiou & P. Pavlou (Eds.), Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education (pp. 114–136). Socrates Comenius.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Addison-Wesley Pusblishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Slater, T. (2010). Assessing language and content: A functional perspective. In A. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the untestable in language education (pp. 217–240). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Reprint-preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morton, T. (2020). Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in CLIL. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 7–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morton, T., & Llinares, A. (2017). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Type of programme or pedagogical model? In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp. 1–16). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otto, A. (2020). Performance-based assessment in CLIL: Competences at the core of learning. In M. E. Gómez-Parra, & C. A. H. Abril (Eds.), Handbook of research on bilingual and intercultural education (pp. 447–468). IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otto, A., & Estrada, J. L. (2019). Towards an understanding of CLIL assessment practices in a European context: Main assessment tools and the role of language in content subjects. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(1), 31–42. [URL].
Pérez-Vidal, C. (2002). Modern languages across the curriculum: Practical case examples, Spain. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Modern languages across the curriculum (pp. 114–130). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reierstam, H. (2015). Assessing language or content? A comparative study of the assessment practices in three Swedish upper secondary CLIL schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg]. [URL]
Reljić, G., Ferring, D., & Martin, R. (2015). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bilingual programs in Europe. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 92–128. [URL].
Hurtado, N., Guerrero, E., Romero, E., & Rubio, F. (2016, July). Towards bilingual teaching in higher education. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain. [URL].
Rohmah, I. I. T., Saleh, M., Faridi, A., & Fitriati, S. W. (2019). Language assessment pattern for primary education in the content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classroom context. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2.2), 101–123. [URL]
Short, D. (1993). Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4). 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šteflíčková, A. (2015). Testing and diagnostics of students’ difficulties in CLIL teaching. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 1529–1530). Charles University in Prague.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tavella, G., & Banegas, D. L. (2016). The CLIL road from planning to assessment: Case studies in Patagonia. In D. L. Banegas, M. Lopez-Barrios, M. Porto, & M. A. Soto (Eds.), ELT as a multidisciplinary endeavor: Growing through collaboration. Selected papers from the 41st FAAPI Conference (pp. 150–160). ASJPI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tedick, D. J., & Cammarata, L. (2012). Content and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), s28–s53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsagari, D., & Michaeloudes, G. (2013). Formative assessment patterns in CLIL primary schools in Cyprus. In D. Tsagari, S. Papadima-Sophocleous, & S. Ioannou-Georgiou (Eds.), International experiences in language testing and assessment (pp. 75–93). Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wewer, T. (2014). Assessment of young learners’ English proficiency in bilingual content instruction CLIL [Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku]. [URL]
Xavier, A. C. D. C. M. (2015). Assessment for Learning in EBE/CLIL: A learning-oriented approach to assessing English language skills and curriculum content at early primary level [Master’s thesis, NOVA University Lisbon]. [URL]
Yang, W. (2016). ESP vs. CLIL: A coin of two sides or a continuum of two extremes. ESP today, 4(1), 43–68. [URL]
Zhetpisbayeva, B. A., Kitibayeva, A. K., Kazimova, D. A., Akbayeva, G. N., & Zatyneiko, M. A. (2018). Assessment issues in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 8(4), 32–38. [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Banegas, Darío Luis
2024. Content and Language Integrated Learning. In Reference Module in Social Sciences, DOI logo
Martínez Agudo, Juan de Dios
2024. The power of subjectivity in CLIL assessment: evidence of cognitive/emotional dissonance. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue