Article published In: 10th Anniversary Celebration
Edited by Pádraig Ó Duibhir and Laurent Cammarata
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:2] 2022
► pp. 207–229
A continuum of teacher collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of bilingual education programmes
Published online: 18 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21022.lo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21022.lo
Abstract
Bilingual education programmes are characterised by the use of students’ second/foreign/additional language (L2)
as the medium of instruction for content subjects. In many educational contexts, such programmes are implemented by content
subject specialists who have not received sufficient training in helping students master content and L2 simultaneously.
Professional development is therefore necessary for this group of teachers. One potential professional development model is
promoting collaboration between content and L2 teachers in the same school. Previous studies have explored different forms of
cross-curricular collaboration, teachers’ attitudes and factors affecting its effectiveness. This paper seeks to extend the
current discussion by investigating different models of teacher collaboration, based on a multi-case study of secondary schools
adopting English (L2) as the medium of instruction for some or all subjects in Hong Kong. With various sources of data and
cross-case comparison, this paper conceptualises a continuum of teacher collaboration in bilingual education programmes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Teacher collaboration in bilingual education
- 1.2Factors influencing teacher collaboration
- 2.Methodology
- 2.1Overall research design
- 2.2Research setting, selection of cases and informants
- 2.3Data collection
- 2.4Data analysis
- 3.Findings and discussion
- 3.1Formal collaboration
- 3.1.1Co-planning curriculum and teaching materials
- 3.1.2Conducting lesson observations
- 3.1.3Professional development (PD) opportunities
- 3.1.4Informal collaboration among teachers
- 3.1.5An English-rich environment with LAC/ English-related activities
- 3.1.6The developmental stages of teacher collaboration
- 3.1Formal collaboration
- 4.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (24)
Cammarata, L., & Haley, C. (2018). Integrated
content, language, and literacy instruction in a Canadian French immersion context: A professional development
journey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 21(3), 332–348.
Cammarata, L., & Ó Ceallaigh, T. J. (Eds.) (2018). Teacher
education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and
teacher educators [Special issue]. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language
Education, 6(2).
Davison, C. (2006). Collaboration
between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right? International
Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 9(4), 454–475.
Education Bureau. (2010). Circular
memorandum No. 139/2010. [URL]
. (2017). Secondary
education curriculum guide (Booklet 2). [URL]
Fan, C., & Lo, Y. Y. (2016). Interdisciplinary
collaboration to promote L2 science literacy in Hong Kong. In A. Tajino, T. Stewart and D. Dalsky (Eds.), Team
teaching and team learning in the language classroom: Collaboration for innovation in
ELT (pp. 94–111). Routledge.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing
teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. Redwood Books.
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Leading
collaborative professionalism. [URL]
Lasagabaster, D. (2018). Fostering
team teaching: Mapping out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university
level. Language
Teaching, 51(3), 400–416.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion
and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT
journal, 64(4), 367–375.
Little, J. W. (1990). The
persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
Lo, Y. Y. (2014). Collaboration
between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC
Journal, 45(2), 181–196.
(2015). A
glimpse into the effectiveness of L2-content cross-curricular collaboration in content-based instruction
programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 18(4), 443–462.
Lyster, R., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2018). Introduction:
Instructional practices and teacher development in CLIL and immersion school
settings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and
Bilingualism, 21(3), 273–274.
Skinnari, K., & Bovellan, E. (2016). CLIL
teachers’ beliefs about integration and about their professional roles: Perspectives from a European
context. In Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual
education (pp. 145–168). Multilingual Matters.
Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A
conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language
instruction. TESOL
Quarterly, 23(2), 201–217.
Tan, M. (2011). Mathematics
and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content
learning. Language Teaching
Research, 15(3), 325–342.
Tedick, D. J., & Cammarata, L. (2012). Content
and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder
perspectives. Foreign Language
Annals, 45(s1), s28–s53.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Liu, Yiqi & Angel M. Y. Lin
Onder-Ozdemir, Neslihan, Adriana Silvina Pagano, Dalmo Buzato, Átila A. S. Vital & Evandro L. T. P. Cunha
Zhao, Yue & Qilin Wang
Lo, Yuen Yi & Weijun (Tim) Liang
Rui, Xiaochen, Xiaochu Li, Yuxia Li & Yuen Yi Lo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
