Article published In: 10th Anniversary Celebration
Edited by Pádraig Ó Duibhir and Laurent Cammarata
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 10:2] 2022
► pp. 182–206
CLIL in the 21st Century
Retrospective and prospective challenges and opportunities
Published online: 24 June 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21021.dal
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21021.dal
Abstract
This article traces the historical phases in the conceptualisation of and research on
Content-and-language-Integrated Learning in Europe since the 1990s. Following upon early programmatic statements, the first wave
of CLIL research concentrated on language learning outcomes. In a second wave, the focus was on descriptions of practice and
studies of participant perspectives. More recently, studies have focused on the unique character of CLIL as an educational
approach in its own right, not simply as a context of foreign language teaching. The crucial content-language interface is being
addressed in research focusing on language and literacy in content curricula and classroom practices. A new CLIL research focus is
the development of pedagogical practice through theory-based interventions. In line with the UN sustainable development goal of
Quality Education, we identify equity and team work as future challenges and argue that CLIL could be a catalyst for a more
collaborative and multidisciplinary approach in education.
Article outline
- 1.Preface
- 2.The multiple faces of CLIL
- 2.1Complex and varied ecologies
- 2.2The need for conceptual clarity
- 3.In retrospect: CLIL as context and approach
- 4.In prospect: Challenges and opportunities for the future
- 4.1CLIL as a catalyst for interdisciplinary and collaborative research and pedagogy
- 4.2Aligning CLIL with the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development in Europe and the world
- 4.2.1In line with SDG targets 4.6. “Universal literacy and numeracy” and 4.7. “Education for sustainable development and global citizenship”
- 4.2.2In line with SDG target 4.4. “Enhancing the acquisition of relevant skills for financial success”
- 4.2.3In line with SDG target 4.5. “Eliminate all discrimination in education”
- 5.Concluding remarks
- Notes
References
References (103)
Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G., & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in the Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency in English. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 75–93.
Badertscher, H., & Bieri, T. (2009). Wissenserwerb im Content and Language Integrated Learning: Empirische Befunde und Interpretationen. Haupt.
Barwell, R. (2016). A Bakhtinian perspective on language and content integration: Encountering the alien word in second language mathematics classrooms. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 101–120). Multilingual Matters.
Bauer-Marschallinger, S. (2016). Acquisition of historical competences in the CLIL history classroom. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
(2019). With united forces: How design-based research can link theory and practice in the transdisciplinary sphere of CLIL. CLIL: Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(2), 7–23.
Berger, A. (2016). Learning mathematics bilingually: An integrated language and mathematics model of word problem solving processes in English as a foreign language. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 73–100). Multilingual Matters.
Bonnet, A., & Breidbach, S. (2017). CLIL teachers’ professionalization: Between explicit knowledge and professional identity. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp. 269–285). Benjamins.
Breeze, R., & Dafouz, E. (2017). Constructing complex Cognitive Discourse Functions in higher education: An exploratory study of exam answers in Spanish- and English-medium instruction settings. System, 701, 81–91.
Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 243–262.
Carrió-Pastor, M. (2021). CLIL vs EMI: Different approaches or same dog with a different collar? In M. L. Carrió-Pastor & B. Bellés Fortuño (Eds.) Teaching language and content in multicultural and multilingual classrooms (pp. 1–10). Palgrave Macmillan.
Codó, E. (2020). The dilemmas of experimental CLIL in Catalonia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.
Codó, E., & Patiño-Santos, A. (2018). CLIL, unequal working conditions and neoliberal subjectivities in a state secondary school. Language Policy, 17(4), 479–499.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.
Coyle, D., & Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies Teaching for Deeper Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dallinger, S., Jonkmann, K., Hollm, J., & Fiege, C. (2016). The effect of Content and Language Integrated Learning on students’ English and history competences: Killing two birds with one stone? Learning and Instruction, 411, 23–31.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Benjamins.
(2013). A construct of Cognitive Discourse Functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253.
(2016). Cognitive Discourse Functions: Specifying an integrative interdisciplinary construct. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 29–54). Multilingual Matters.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Bauer-Marschallinger, S. (2019). Cognitive Discourse Functions meet historical competences: Towards an integrated pedagogy in CLIL history education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(1), 30–60.
(forthcoming). L2 proficiency and development in CLIL (chapter 11). In D. Banegas & S. Zappa (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Content and Language Integrated Learning. Routledge.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T. (2006). Pragmatics of content-based instruction: Teacher and student directives in Finnish and Austrian classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(2), 241–267.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T. (2014). ‘‘You can stand under my umbrella’’: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218.
deBoer, M., & Leontjev, D. (Eds.). (2020). Assessment and learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms: Approaches and conceptualisations. Springer.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209–224.
European Centre of Modern Languages (ECML). [URL]
European Commission. (1995). White paper on education and training. Teaching and learning: towards the learning society. Directorate General for Education Youth Sport and Culture. [URL]
. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004–2006. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. [URL]
. (2012). Special Eurobarometer 36: Europeans and their Languages. [URL]
European Parliament. (2021). Factsheet: Language Policy. [URL]
Evnitskaya, N., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2020). Cognitive Discourse Functions in CLIL classrooms: Eliciting and analysing students’ oral categorizations in science and history. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
Evnitskaya, N., Jakonen, T. (2017). Multimodal conversation analysis and CLIL classroom practices. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (eds.). Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 201–220.
Fernández-Agüero, M., & Hidalgo-McCabe, E. (2020). CLIL students’ affectivity in the transition between education levels: The effect of streaming at the beginning of secondary education. Journal of Language, Identity & Education.
Fortune, T., Tedick, D., & Walker, C. (2008). Integrated language and content teaching: Insights from the language immersion classroom. In T. Fortune & D. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to Multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp. 71–96). Multilingual Matters.
Gablasova, D. (2014). Issues in the assessment of bilingually educated students: Expressing subject knowledge through L1 and L2. Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 151–164.
Garzón-Díaz, E. (2021). From cultural awareness to scientific citizenship: Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning projects to connect environmental science and English in a state school in Colombia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(2), 242–259.
Genesee, F. (2004). What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students? In T. K. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism and multiculturalism (pp. 547–576). Blackwell.
Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). The contribution of CLIL to learners’ international orientation and EFL confidence. The Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 246–256.
(2019). Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in Europe: A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal, 18(6), 675–698.
Hüttner, J. (2017). ELF and Content and Language Integrated Learning. In J. Jenkins, W. Baker, & M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca (pp. 481–493). Routledge.
Hüttner, J., & Smit, U. (2018). Negotiating political positions: Subject-specific oral language use in CLIL classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 287–302.
Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284.
Ikeda, M., Izumi, S., Watanabe, Y., Pinner, R., & Davis, M. (2022). Soft CLIL and English language teaching: Understanding Japanese policy, practice, and implications. Routledge.
Kääntä, L. (2014). From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 661, 86–105.
Lasagabaster, D. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 3–18.
Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2017). A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on affective factors. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 688–712.
Lin, A. & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Trans/languaging and the triadic dialogue in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Language and Education 31(1), 26–45.
Lin, A. M. (2019). Theories of trans/languaging and trans-semiotizing: Implications for content-based education classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 5–16.
Llinares, A. (2015). Integration in CLIL: A proposal to inform research and successful pedagogy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 58–73.
Llinares, A., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). The role of different tasks in CLIL students’ use of evaluative language. System, 541, 69–79.
Llinares, A., & Evnitskaya, N. (2021). Classroom interaction in CLIL programs: Offering opportunities or fostering inequalities? TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 366–397.
Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (Eds.). (2020). Systemic Functional Linguistics: A social-semiotic approach to Content and Language Integrated Learning in bilingual/multilingual education. Special Issue of International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
Llinares, A., & Mendikoetxea, A. (2020). Enhancing international competence in EMI: Teacher reflective practices. In M. M. Sánchez-Pérez (Ed.), Teacher training for English-Medium Instruction on higher education (pp. 87–105). IGI Global.
Llinares, A., & Nashaat-Sobhy, N. (2021). What is an ecosystem? Defining science in primary school CLIL contexts. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3(2), 337–362.
Llinares, A., & Pascual Peña, I. (2015). A genre approach to the effect of academic questions on CLIL students’ language production. Language and Education, 29(1), 15–30.
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL. Does professional development help? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–15.
Lo, Y. Y., & Jeong, H. (2018). Impact of genre-based pedagogy on students’ academic literacy development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Linguistics and Education, 471, 36–46.
Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (Eds.) (2021). Teaching, learning and scaffolding in CLIL science classrooms. Benjamins. Originally published as special issue of Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7(2), 2019.
Lorenzo, F. (2017). Historical literacy in bilingual settings: Cognitive academic language in CLIL history narratives. Linguistics and Education, 371, 32–41.
Lorenzo, F., Granados, A., & Ávila, I. (2019). The development of cognitive academic language proficiency in multilingual education: Evidence of a longitudinal study on the language of history. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 411, 100767.
Lorenzo, F., Granados, A., & Rico, N. (2021). Equity in bilingual education: Socioeconomic status and Content and Language Integrated Learning in monolingual Southern Europe. Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 393–413.
Madrid, D., & Barrios, E. (2018). A comparison of students’ educational achievement across programmes and school types with and without CLIL provision. Porta Linguarum, 291, 29–50.
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE: The European dimension: Action, trends and foresight potential. UniCOM.
Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2007). CLIL as a catalyst for change in languages education. Babylonia, 7(3), 33–37.
Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150.
McCabe, A., & Whittaker, R. (2017). Genre and appraisal in CLIL history texts: Developing the voice of the historian. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp. 105–124). Benjamins.
Mearns, T., de Graaff, R., & Coyle, D. (2017). Motivation for or from bilingual education? A comparative study of learner views in the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–14.
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to Content and Language Integrated Learning: Mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57.
Moore, P., & Nikula, T. (2016). Translanguaging in CLIL classrooms. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 211–234). Multilingual Matters.
Nashaat Sobhy, N. (2018a). Pragmatics in CLIL. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 31(2), 467–494.
Nashaat-Sobhy. (2018b). Operationalizing “defining” from a cognitive discourse perspective for learners’ use. In S. Anwaruddin (Ed.), Knowledge Mobilization in TESOL: Connecting research and practice (pp. 94–112). Brill Sense.
Nashaat-Sobhy, N. & Llinares, A. (2020). CLIL students’ definitions of historical terms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.
Nieto Moreno de Diezmas, E. (2018). The acquisition of L2 listening comprehension skills in primary and secondary education setting: A comparison between CLIL and non-CLIL student performance. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada, 56(2), 13–34.
Nikula, T. (2005). English as an object and tool of study in classrooms: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications. Linguistics and Education, 16(1), 27–58.
Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U. (Eds.) (2016). Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Multilingual Matters.
Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., & Lorenzo, F. (2016). More than content and language: The complexity of integration in CLIL and bilingual education. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 1–25). Multilingual Matters.
Oattes, H., Oostdam, R., de Graaff, R., & Wilschut, A. (2018). The challenge of balancing content and language: Perceptions of Dutch bilingual education history teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 701, 165–174.
Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Language Learning, 631, 1–24.
Otwinowska, A., Foryś, M. (2017). They learn the CLIL way, but do they like it? Affectivity and cognition in upper-primary CLIL classes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 457–480.
Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical and relational identity negotiation in the Finnish CLIL context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 651, 61–70.
Paran, A. (2013). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 317–342.
Pascual, I., & Basse, R. (2017). Assessment for learning in CLIL classroom discourse: The case of metacognitive questions. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp. 221–235). Benjamins.
Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2016). From the CLIL craze to the CLIL conundrum: Addressing the current CLIL controversy. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Languages & Literature, 9(1), 9–31.
Piesche, N., Jonkmann, K., Fiege, C., & Keßler, J.-U. (2016). CLIL for all? A randomised controlled field experiment with sixth-grade students on the effects of content and language integrated science learning. Learning and Instruction, 441, 108–116.
Rascón Moreno, D. J., & Bretones Callejas, C. M. (2018). Socioeconomic status and its impact on language and content attainment in CLIL contexts. Porta Linguarum, 291, 115–135.
Roiha, A., & Sommier, M. (2018). Viewing CLIL through the eyes of former pupils. Insights into foreign language and intercultural attitudes. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(6), 631–647.
Rumlich, D. (2016). Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest. Peter Lang.
(2020). Bilingual education in monolingual contexts: A comparative perspective. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 115–119.
Skinnari, K., & Bovellan, E. (2016). CLIL teachers’ beliefs about integration and about their professional roles: Perspectives from a European context. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp.145–167). Multilingual Matters.
Somers, T., & Llinares, A. (2021). Students’ motivation for content and language integrated learning and the role of programme intensity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(6), 839–854.
Tsuchiya, K., & Pérez Murillo, M. D. (Eds.). (2019). Content and Language Integrated Learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts: Policy, practice and pedagogy. Springer Nature.
van Kampen, E., Admiraal, W., Berry, A. (2018). Content and Language Integrated Learning in the Netherlands: Teachers’ self-reported pedagogical practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 222–236.
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K. & Xu, X. (2015). The effects of English bilingual education in the Netherlands. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), S. 4–27.
Vollmer, H. J. (2006). Language across the curriculum. Preliminary study. Languages of schooling: towards a framework for Europe. Intergovernmental Conference. Strasbourg. [URL]
Cited by (33)
Cited by 33 other publications
Guzmán-Alcón, Irene & Francisco Lorenzo
Hüttner, Julia, Ana Llinares & Tarja Nikula
Kaiypova, Fatima, Hansol Lee, Yuen Yi Lo & Jang Ho Lee
Lege, Ryan, Euan Bonner & Erin Frazier
Lo, Alfred W. T.
Moate, Josephine, Russell Cross & Kim Bower
2025. Harnessing the situated nature of CLIL for teacher education through a comparative study. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Morton, Tom
Nashaat-Sobhy, Nashwa, Eva M. Mestre-Mestre & Penny MacDonald
2025. A review of a decade of scaffolding practices for learning in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 13:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Onder-Ozdemir, Neslihan, Adriana Silvina Pagano, Dalmo Buzato, Átila A. S. Vital & Evandro L. T. P. Cunha
Rieder-Marschallinger, Silvia
S, Gnana Sanga Mithra & Ananth Padmanabhan
Sari, Tarin Tiara & Khoiriyah Khoiriyah
Urionaguena, Mikel, Ane Urizar, Eneko Antón & Eneritz Garro Larrañaga
Xin, Jieting Jerry & Yuen Yi Lo
Albuquerque Paraná, Raul, Julia Landau & Sávio Siqueira
Azpilicueta-Martínez, Raúl
Ikeda, Makoto
Lasagabaster, David & Alberto Fernández-Costales
Llinares, Ana & Tarja Nikula
Lo, Yuen Yi & Weijun (Tim) Liang
Morton, Tom & Nashwa Nashaat‐Sobhy
Poveda-Garcia-Noblejas, Belen & Svetlana Antropova
Sato, Takanori
2024. The relationship between teachers’ pedagogical practices in CLIL and the development of students’ foreign language oral proficiency. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
Segura, Marta & Yağmur Elif Met
2024. EFL lexical abilities in pre-primary education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Teng, Xing San, Janet Hsiao & Yuen Yi Lo
2024. Cognitive processes and strategies of bilingual students when attempting assessments in an L2. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Barcena-Toyos, Patricia
Liu, Jiajia Eve, Yuen Yi Lo & Jieting Jerry Xin
Llinares, Ana & Nashwa Nashaat-Sobhy
Nikula, Tarja
Otto, Ana & María Elena Serrano-Moya
Pun, Jack & Neslihan Onder-Ozdemir
Evnitskaya, Natalia & Ana Llinares
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
