Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 11:1 (2023) ► pp.55–89

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) and the linguistic difficulties of Saudi students learning algebra

ORCiD logo with link | Prince Mohammed Bin Fahd University
Published online: 1 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.20009.elt
Abstract
This study explores the type of linguistic difficulties that Saudi students encounter in Introductory Algebra courses at college level and how an integrated pedagogical approach, such as Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), might impact students’ learning of both algebra and the language needed to learn it. A mixed-method design was implemented for 12 weeks to collect and analyze data in three phases. The study sample comprised of a study group of 28 students from an Introductory Algebra class. Findings identified and classified the types of difficulties that the students encountered and suggested a CLIL instructional model to overcome or minimize them.
نبذة مختصرة
تستكشف هذه الدراسة نوع الصعوبات اللغوية التي يواجهها الطلاب السعوديون في فصول الجبر التمهيدية على مستوى الجامعة وكيف يمكن أن يؤثر نهج تربوي متكامل، مثل التعلم المتكامل للغة والمحتوى (CLIL)، على تعلم الطلاب لكل من الجبر واللغة المطلوبة لتعلم الجبر. تم تطبيق تصميم الطريقة المختلطة لمدة 12 أسبوعًا لجمع البيانات وتحليلها على ثلاث مراحل. تكونت عينة الدراسة من مجموعة مكونة من 28 طالبًا من أحد فصول الجبر التمهيدي. حددت النتائج وصنفت أنواع الصعوبات التي واجهها الطلاب واقترح نموذجًا تعليميًا لـ CLIL للتغلب على الصعوبات أو تقليلها.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Study design
    • 3.1Participants and settings
    • 3.2Methods and instrumentation
    • 3.3Study Intervention Plan
    • 3.4Study phases
      • i.Phase 1: Pre-intervention (1 week)
      • ii.Phase 2: Intervention (10 weeks)
      • iii.Phase 3: Post-intervention (1 week)
  • 4.Study findings
    • 4.1Pre-intervention questionnaire
    • 4.2Documents
      • 4.2.1Academic language and academic literacies
      • 4.2.2Understanding questions and giving answers in English
      • 4.2.3Translating word phrases into algebraic expressions
      • 4.2.4Natural language in the academic context
      • 4.2.5Writing definitions of concepts
      • 4.2.6Using the available resources
      • 4.2.7Interaction and communication
      • 4.2.8Understanding the meaning of some abbreviations and words
      • 4.2.9The Use of L1
      • 4.2.10Eastern Arabic Numerals and Western-Arabic Numerals
        • Phase 2.Summary of findings
    • 4.3Post-intervention questionnaire – Students’ perceptions
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1First research question
    • 5.2Second research question
    • 5.3Limitations
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (27)
References
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators’ research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 347–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brady, H. E., Collier, D., & Seawright, J. (2004). Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology. In H. E. Brady, & D. Collier. (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 3–20). Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barwell, R. (2009). Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1986). Language in the classroom. Annual review of applied linguistics, 71, 18–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2008). Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In Delanoy, W., Volkmann, L. (Eds.), Future Perspectives in English Language Teaching (pp. 7–23). Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study on derivation. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durkin, K., & Shire, B. (1991). Primary school children’s interpretations of lexical ambiguity in mathematical descriptions. Journal of Research in Reading, 14(1), 46–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldhaber, A. S. (2006). Math as a language in its own right. American Scientist, 94(2), 185–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kersaint, G., Thompson, D. R., & Petkova, M. (2014). Teaching mathematics to English language learners. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krieger, Z. (2007). Saudi Arabia puts its billions behind Western-style higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(3). pp. 1–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kunitzsch, P. (2003). The transmission of Hindu-Arabic numerals reconsidered. The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives, 3–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (Eds.). (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marsh, D., & Mehisto, P. (2011). Approaching the economic, cognitive and health benefits of bilingualism: Fuel for CLIL. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra- F. Gallardo del Puerto. (Eds), Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning, 361. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A plurtliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning-mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohan, B. & Leung, C. & Slater, T. (2010). Assessing Language and Content: A Functional Perspective. In A. Paran & S. Lies. (Eds.) Testing the Untestable in Language Education (pp. 217–240). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moores-Abdool, W., Yahya, N., & Unzueta, C. H. (2009, May). Learning preferences of Saudi university students with native English-speaking teachers. The 2nd. Annual Conference of Saudi Arabia Association of Language Teachers (KSAALT), Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moschkovich, J. N. (2007). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikula, T. (2006, August). CLIL as student empowerment? Observations on language use in Finnish CLIL Classrooms [paper presentation]. ESSE8 Conference, London.
(2007). The IFR pattern and space for interaction: Observations on EFL and CLIL classrooms. In C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit. (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 179–204). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (1999). Towards a systemic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts. Semiotica, 124(1–2), 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seethaler, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., Star, J. R., & Bryant, J. (2011). The cognitive predictors of computational skill with whole versus rational numbers: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 536–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veel, R. (1999). Language, knowledge and authority in school mathematics. In F. Christie. (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp. 185–216). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zydatiß, W. (2012). Linguistic thresholds in the CLIL classroom? The threshold hypothesis revisited. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 16–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rose, Heath, Kari Sahan, Minhui Wei, Ikuya Aizawa, Sihan Zhou & Christopher Shepard
2026. A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education: An update of Macaro et al. (2018). System 136 ► pp. 103892 ff. DOI logo
Eltoum, Russina A
2023. The conceptual difficulties Saudi female ELL students encountered in learning algebra: A case of a college preparatory program. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education 2:3 ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue