Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 2:1 (2014) ► pp.96–118

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Language ideologies and Cherokee revitalization

Impracticality, legitimacy, and hope

 | University of Kansas
Published online: 17 March 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.2.1.05pet
Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma has enacted a revitalization plan to promote Cherokee language in a variety of settings, and many tribal citizens have begun to confront how language factors into their identities as Cherokees. In particular, Tsalagi Dideloquasdi, the Cherokee immersion school, has become an important sociolinguistic site for the articulation of deeply seated beliefs and attitudes about issues such as the practicality of the language in contemporary times and who has a legitimate right to learn and speak the language. The purpose of this paper is to elucidate these attitudes and beliefs as well as the ideologies that inform them. Assuming a critical ethnographic stance, I examine the hegemonic discourses and structures that have led to the loss of Cherokee over generations as well as to three ideologies — impracticality, legitimacy, and hope — that influence the current efforts of the immersion school stakeholders.
References (38)
Bender, M. (2009). Visibility, authenticity, and insiderness in Cherokee language ideologies. In P. V. Kroskrity & M. C. Field (Eds.), Native American language ideologies: Beliefs, practices, and struggles in Indian country (pp. 123–147). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, B. J. (1992). Language maintenance and language renewal among Cherokee people in Oklahoma. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics , 171, 109–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cherokee Nation. (2003). Ga-du-gi: A vision for working together to preserve the Cherokee language. Report of a needs assessment survey and a 10-year language revitalization plan. Final report submitted in fulfillment of fy 2001 dhs ana grant #90-nl-0189.
. (2006). Cherokee Nation passes record budget for new fiscal year. Cherokee Nation News Release . Retrieved January 19, 2014, from [URL].
Dauenhauer, N. M., & Dauenhauer, R. (1998). Technical, emotional, and ideological issues in reversing language shift: Examples from Southeast Alaska. In L. A. Grenoble & L. J. Whaley (Eds.), Endangered languages: Current issues and future prospects (pp. 57–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorian, N. C. (1998). Western language ideologies and small-language prospects. In L. A. Grenoble & L. J. Whaley (Eds.), Endangered languages: Current issues and future prospects (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enduring Voices. (2014). Disappearing languages. Retrieved January 19, 2014, from [URL].
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power . Essex, UK: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, M. C., & Kroskrity, P. V. (2009). Introduction: Revealing native American language ideologies. In P. V. Kroskrity & M. C. Field (Eds.), Native American language ideologies (pp. 3–28). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (2001). Can threatened languages be saved? Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (R. R. Barr, Trans.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy, and civic courage . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, M., & Duchêne, A. (2007). Discourses of endangerment: Sociolinguistics, globalization and social order. In A. Duchêne & M. Heller (Eds.), Discourses of endangerment (pp. 1–13). NY: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, R., & May, S. (2011). Exploring biliteracy in Māori-medium education: An ethnographic perspective. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 161–183). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, L. (1994). Flutes of fire: Essays on California Indian languages . Berkeley: Heyday Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Teaching methods. In L. Hinton & K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 179–189). San Diego: Academic Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. (2006). Nichols to NCLB: Local and global perspectives on US language education policy. In O. García, T. Skutnabb-Kangas & M. E. Torres-Guzmán (Eds.), Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and globalization (pp. 223–237). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (1999). Ideologies in action: Language politics on Corsica . NY: Mouton de Gruyter. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Minority language learning and communicative competence: Models of identity and participation in Corsican adult language courses. Language and Communication . [URL]
Krauss, M. (1992). The world’s languages in crisis. Language , 68(1), 4–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). Status of Native American language endangerment. In G. Cantoni (Ed.), Stabilizing indigenous languages . Flagstaff: Center for Excellence in Education, Northern Arizona University. Retrieved January 19, 2014 from: [URL].
(2007). Classification and terminology for degrees of language endangerment. In M. Brenzinger (Ed.), Language diversity endangered (pp. 1–8). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, S. (2013). Indigenous immersion education: International developments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education , 1(1), 34–69. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. (2002). A place to be Navajo: Rough Rock and the struggle for self-determination in indigenous schooling . Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L., Romero-Little, M. E., Warhol, L., & Zepeda, O. (2011). Critical ethnography and indigenous language survival: Some new directions in language policy research and praxis. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 30–51). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L., Romero-Little, M. E., & Zepeda, O. (2006). Native American youth discourses on language shift and retention: Ideological cross-currents and their implications for language planning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism , 9(5), 659–677. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L., & Watahomigie, L. J. (1999). Indigenous education and grassroots language planning in the USA. Practicing Anthropology , 21(2), 5–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perdue, T., & Green, M. D. (Eds.). (1995). The Cherokee removal: A brief history with documents . Boston: Bedford Books of St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter, L. (2003). A naturalistic study of the Cherokee language immersion preschool project . (PhD dissertation), University of Kansas. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter, L., Hirata-Edds, T., & Montgomery-Anderson, B. (2008). Verb development by children in the Cherokee language immersion program, with implications for teaching. International Journal of Applied Linguistics , 18(2), 166–187. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peter, L., Sly, G., & Hirata-Edds, T. (2011). Using language assessment to inform instruction in indigenous language immersion. In D. J. Tedick, D. Christian & T. W. Fortune (Eds.), Immersion education: Practices, policies, possibilities (pp. 187–208). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
S. 2167-101. (1990). Senate bill 2167--101st congress: Native American languages act. H.R. 5518–101. Retrieved January 19, 2014, from [URL].
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sturm, C. (2002). Race, culture, and identity in the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thornton, R. (1990). The Cherokees: A population history . Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 231, 55–82. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Ballinger, Susan
2021. Oral Corrective Feedback in Content-Based Contexts. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo
Nassaji, Hossein & Eva Kartchava
2019. Content-Based L2 Teaching. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 597 ff. DOI logo
Hirata-Edds, Tracy & Lizette Peter
2016. Multi-competence and endangered language revitalization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multi-Competence, ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Palmer, Deborah K., Susan Ballinger & Lizette Peter
2014. Classroom interaction in one-way, two-way, and indigenous immersion contexts. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 2:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue