Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 2:1 (2014) ► pp.74–95

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Responding to national curriculum goals for English language learners

Enhancing reading strategies in junior high school content areas

 | Queensland University of Technology
 | Education Queensland
Published online: 17 March 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.2.1.04alf
The official need for content teachers to teach the language features of their fields has never been greater in Australia than now. In 2012, the recently formed national curriculum board announced that all teachers are responsible for the English language development of students whose first language or dialect is not Standard Australian English (SAE). This formal endorsement is an important juncture regarding the way expertise might be developed, perceived and exchanged between content and language teachers through collaboration, in order for the goals of English language learners in content areas to be realised. To that end, we conducted an action research project to explore and extend the reading strategies pedagogy of one English language teacher who teaches English language learners in a parallel junior high school Geography program. Such pedagogy will be valuable for all teachers as they seek to contribute to English language development goals as outlined in national curricula.
References (54)
Adams, M. & Dutro, S. (2005). Open Court reading English learner support guide . Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adoniou, M. & Macken-Horarick, M. (2007). Scaffolding literacy meets ESL: Some insights from ACT classrooms. TESOL in Context, 17(1), 5–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alvermann, D., Phelps, S., & Gillis, V. (2010). Content Area Reading and Literacy – Succeeding in today’s diverse classrooms (6th ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkoudis, S. (2006). Negotiating the rough ground between EAL/D and mainstream teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism , 9(4), 415–43. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ACARA. (2012). English as an additional language teacher resource overview and EAL/D learning progression foundation to Year 101. Retrieved August, 29, 2012 from [URL].
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Integrating content and language in English language teaching in secondary education: models, benefits and challenges. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 111–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners . New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research . Lewes: Falmer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, J. (2000). Signals and reading comprehension: Theory and practice. System , 281, 247–259. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Commins, L., Houston, C., & Lambart, M. (1989). English language development across the curriculum (ELDAC) . Brisbane Queensland: Department of Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corson, D. (1990). Language policy across the curriculum . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Language, minority education and gender . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, M. (2010). Content and language integrated learning . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creese, A. (2002). The discursive construction of power in teaching partnerships: Language and subject specialists in mainstream schools. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 597–616. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Is this content-based language teaching? Linguistics and Education, 161, 188–204. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davison, C. (2001). Current policies, programs and practices in school ESL. In B. Mohan, C. Leung & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 30–50). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davison. C. (2006). Collaboration between EAL/D and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 454–475. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davison, C. & Williams, A. (2001). Integrating language and content: Unresolved issues. In Mohan, B., C. Leung & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 51–70). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, E. J. & Harper, C. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough? Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 101–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fang, Z. & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: a language-based pedagogy . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom . Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (2008). Intellectual challenge and ESL students: Implications of quality teaching initiatives. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy , 31(2), 128–154.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Hope and challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 223–240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammond, J. & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20(1), 6–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harklau, L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 241–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harper, C., and de Jong, E. (2004). Misconceptions about teaching English language learners. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 48(2), 152–162. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, P., Turbill, J., Fitzsimmons, P., & McKenzie, B. (2006). Reading in the primary school years (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Thomson Social Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewings, A. & North, S. (2006). Emergent disciplinarity: A comparative of theme in undergraduate essays. In R. Whittaker, R., M. O’Donnell & A. McCabe, (Eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches (pp. 266–281). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, C. (2001). Evaluation of content-language learning in the mainstream classroom. In B. Mohan, C. Leung & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream: Teaching, learning and identity (pp. 177–195). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucas, T. & Grinberg, J. (2008). Responding to the linguistic reality of mainstream classrooms: Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman Nemser, J. McIntyre & J. Demmer (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.) (pp. 606–636). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyle, S. (2000). Enhancing literacy through geography in upper primary classrooms. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 9(2), 141–156. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
May, S., & Wright, N. (2007). Secondary literacy across the curriculum: Challenges and possibilities. Language and Education, 21(5), 370–376. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Met, M. (1999). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. NFLC Reports .Washington, DC: The National Foreign Language Centre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2009). Teaching refugee learners with interrupted education in science: Vocabulary, literacy and pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 571–592. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKay, P., Hudson, C., Newton, M., & Guse, J. (2007). Assessing, monitoring and understanding English as a second language in schools: The NLLIA ESL Bandscales Version 21. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology and Independent Schools Queensland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, B. & Poon, L. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signalling on recall of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 141–159. .
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogle, D. (2010). Comprehension in social studies. In K. Ganske & D. Fisher (Eds.), Comprehension across the curriculum: Perspective and practices K-12 (pp. 160–174). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peercy, M. & Martin-Beltran, M. (2011). Envisioning collaboration: Including ESOL students and teachers in the mainstream classroom. International Journal of Inclusive Education , 16(7), 657–673. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Queensland Studies Authority (QSA). (2007). Queensland curriculum assessment and reporting framework: English essential learnings by end of Year 9: Reading and viewing . Retrieved July 29, 2011 from: [URL].
Rushton, K. (2008). Cooperative planning and teaching for ESL students in the mainstream classroom. TESOL in Context, 18(1), 21–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scales, H. (2007). Shark declines threaten shellfish stocks . Retrieved Aug. 4, 2011 from [URL].
Schleppegrell, M, (2004). The Language of schooling. A functional linguistics perspective . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. & O’Hallaron, C. (2011). Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 311, 3–18. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (2007). Literacy skills in the information age . Paper presented at the 15th European Conference on Reading. Humboldt University, Berlin.
Unsworth, L. (2001) Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice . Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urquhart, V., & Frazee, D. (2012). Teaching reading in the content areas – if not me, then who? (3rd ed.). Denver, Colorado: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wyatt-Smith, C. M. & Cumming, J. J. (1999). Examining the literacy demands of the enacted curriculum. Literacy Learning: Secondary Thoughts, 7(2), 19–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, S. (2010). Teaching English Learners: Literacy strategies and resources for K-6 . Guildford Press: New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Veliz, Leonardo & Mauricio Véliz-Campos
2025. Multimodality as a “third space” for English as an additional language or dialect teaching: early career teachers’ use and integration of technology in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. Educational Review 77:4 ► pp. 1140 ff. DOI logo
Beekman, Caroline, Barry J. Fraser & Felicity I. McLure
2024. English as Additional Language (EAL) Status as a Determinant of Learning Environment, Attitudes and Achievement. World Studies in Education 24:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Heidari, Neli, Markus Sebastian Feser, Nina Scholten, Knut Schwippert & Sandra Sprenger
2023. Language in primary and secondary geography education: a systematic literature review of empirical geography education research. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 32:3 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Mpofu, Nhlanhla & Mncedisi C Maphalala
2021. Content Subject Teachers’ Views of Implementing the English Across the Curriculum (EAC) Approach: A Study of Some South African High Schools. Journal of Language and Education 7:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Neilsen, Roderick
2020. Demystifying ‘Grammar’. In Rethinking Languages Education, ► pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Dobinson, Toni & Bich Nguyen
2018. Teaching Young EAL/D Learners in Mainstream Contexts. In Teaching Young Second Language Learners, ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Bergroth, Mari
2016. Reforming the national core curriculum for bilingual education in Finland. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 4:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue