Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 8:2 (2020) ► pp.257–284
EMI lecturers’ practices in correcting English
Resources for language teaching?
Published online: 14 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.19011.man
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.19011.man
Abstract
Research on English-medium instruction (EMI) has pointed to lecturers’ refusal to teach or correct English. This
study seeks empirical evidence to investigate the extent to which content lecturers’ assessment practices align with their
expressed beliefs regarding language teaching. Drawing on three types of data – a questionnaire, interviews and students’ exams –
we aimed at finding and exploring EMI lecturers’ written corrective feedback (WCF) as part of language assessment practices.
Findings suggest that while EMI content lecturers repeatedly express their refusal to teach English, their actual teaching
practices show evidence of some provision of language-related feedback. These findings are discussed against university language
education policy. A gate opener lecturer profile is identified whose corrective feedback creates opportunities
for correctly using disciplinary English.
Resum
La recerca en ensenyament amb l’anglès com a llengua vehicular ha identificat la reticència dels professors
de contingut a ensenyar o corregir l’anglès. Aquest estudi persegueix identificar evidència empírica per tal d’investigar fins a
quin punt les pràctiques de correcció dels professors de contingut que ensenyen en anglès coincideixen amb les seves creences en
relació a l’ensenyament de llengua. Basant-nos en tres tipus de dades – un qüestionari, entrevistes i exàmens d’estudiants – el
nostre objectiu és trobar i explorar correccions escrites que es puguin tipificar com a pràctiques d’avaluació de llengua. Els
resultats indiquen que la negativa dels professors de contingut a ensenyar anglès queda repetidament palesa en les entrevistes,
mentre que la seva pràctica real demostra que sí que proporcionen feedback relacionat amb llengua. Aquesta
troballa s’analitza en el marc de la política lingüística de la universitat. Identifiquem un perfil de professor que anomenem
‘facilitador’ (gate opener), les correccions del qual creen oportunitats per tal què els estudiants emprin
l’anglès disciplinari correctament.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1EMI lecturers and corrective feedback
- 2.2Corrective feedback and assessment
- 3.The study
- 3.1Context
- 3.2Research questions
- 3.3Methodology and instruments
- 3.4Participants
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Analysis of surveys
- 4.2Analysis of interviews
- 4.3Analysis of corrective feedback
- 4.4Analysis of penalization of mistakes
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (66)
Ackerley, K., Guarda, M., & Helm, F. (2017). Sharing perspectives on English-medium instruction. Bern: Peter Lang.
Aguilar, M. (2017). Engineering lecturers’ views on CLIL and EMI. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(6), 722–735.
Aguilar-Pérez, M., & Arnó-Macià, E. (2020). ‘He’s a good lecturer in any language’: Shifting from L1 to English and implications for EMI training. In M. Sánchez-Pérez (Ed.), Teacher training for English-medium instruction in higher education (pp. 153–177). IGI: Pennsylvania.
Airey, J. (2011). Talking about teaching in English: Swedish university lecturers’ experiences of changing teaching language. IBERICA, 221(Fall), 35–54.
(2012). ‘I don’t teach language.’ The linguistic attitudes of physics lecturers in Sweden. AILA Review, 251, 64–79.
(2016). EAP, EMI or CLIL? In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 71–83). London: Routledge.
Arnó-Macià, E., & Mancho-Barés, G. (2015). The role of content and language in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at university: Challenges and implications for ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 371, 63–73.
Baker, C. (2006). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (2nd ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ball, P., & Lindsay, D. (2013). Language demands and support for English-medium instruction in tertiary education: Learning from a specific context. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges (pp. 44–61). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Boletín Oficial del Estado. (2010). Real Decreto 1791/2010, de 30 de diciembre, por el que se aprueba el estatuto del estudiante universitario. [URL]
Breeze, R., & Sancho Guinda, C. (Eds.) (2017). Essential competencies for English-medium university teaching. Switzerland: Springer.
Briggs, A., Coleman, M., & Morrison, M. (2012). Research educational leadership and management. London: Sage.
Chen, F. (2017). Instructional language use in environmental science classroom. In W. Tsou & S.-M. Kao (Eds.), English as a medium of instruction in higher education (pp. 57–78). Singapore: Springer.
Chou, J. T. (2017). Use of authentic materials in law school. In W. Tsou & S.-M. Kao (Eds.), English as a medium of instruction in higher education (pp. 131–145). Singapore: Springer.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2001). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Costa, F. (2012). Focus on form in ICLHE lectures in Italy: Evidence from English-medium science lectures by native speakers of Italian. AILA Review, 251, 30–47.
(2016). CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) through English in Italian higher education. Milan: LED.
Cots, J. M., & Clemente, M. (2011). Tandem Teaching in CLIL for tertiary education. In C. Escobar & L. Nussbaum (Eds.), Aprendre en una altra llengua (pp. 165–184). Bellaterra: Servei de publicacions de la UAB.
Dafouz, E., & Camacho-Miñano, M. (2016). Exploring the impact of English-medium instruction on university student academic achievement: The case of accounting. English for Specific Purposes, 441, 57–67.
Dearden, J. (2015). English as a medium of instruction – A growing global phenomenon. Oxford: Oxford UP.
(2018). The changing roles of EMI academics and English language specialists. In J. Kirkgöz & K. Dikilitas (Eds.), Key issues on English for specific purposes in higher education (pp. 323–338). Switzerland: Springer.
Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2016). Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English: A three country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 455–486.
Dimova, S., Hultgren, A., & Jensen, C. (2015). English-medium instruction in European higher education: Review and future research. In S. Dimova, A. K. Hultgren, & C. Jensen (Eds.), English-medium instruction in European higher education (pp. 317–323). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2011). Internationalization, multilingualism and English-medium instruction. World Englishes, 30(3), 345–359.
(Eds.) (2013). English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Drljač Margić, B., & Vodopija-Krstanović, I. (2017). Uncovering English-medium instruction. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Evans, N., Hartshorn, J., & Tuioti, E. (2010). Written corrective feedback: Practitioners’ perspectives. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 47–77.
Fenton-Smith, B., Humphreys, P., & Walkinshaw, I. (Eds.) (2017). English medium instruction in higher education in Asia-Pacific. Switzerland: Springer.
Ferris, D. (2014). Responding to student writing: Teachers’ philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 191, 6–23.
Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2012). Academics’ beliefs about language use and proficiency in Spanish multilingual higher education. AILA Review, 251, 48–63.
Guarda, M., & Helm, F. (2017). A survey of lecturers’ needs and feedback on EMI training. In K. Ackerley, M. Guarda, & F. Helm (Eds.), Sharing perspectives on English-medium instruction (pp. 167–194). Bern: Peter Lang.
Harrington, K. (2011). The Roles of Assessment in ‘Writing in the Disciplines’ (WiD). In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 48–62). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hyland, F. (2011). The language potential of form-focuses feedback on writing: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 159–189). Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2013). Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 240–253.
Klaassen, R. (2008). Preparing lecturers from English-medium instruction. In R. Wilkinson & V. Zegers (Eds.), Realizing content and language integration in higher education (pp. 32–42). Maastricht: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
Lasagabaster, D. (2015). Multilingual language policy: Is it becoming a misnomer at university level? In S. Dimova, A. K. Hultgren & C. Jensen (Eds.), English-medium instruction in European higher education (pp. 115–134). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M., & Dearden, J. (2016). English-medium instruction in universities: A collaborative experiment in Turkey. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 51–76.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76.
Mancho-Bares, G., & Aguilar-Pérez, M. (2016). Problematizing on language learning issues in EMI: Opinions of science and technology EMI lecturers. In R. R. Breeze (Ed.), CLIL+ Science: New directions in content and language integration for science and technology (pp. 110–113). Pamplona: Servicio de publicaciones Universidad de Navarra.
Mancho-Barés, G., & Arnó-Macià, E. (2017). EMI lecturer training programmes and academic literacies: A critical insight from ESP. ESP Today, 5(2), 266–290.
McCambridge, L., & Saarinen, T. (2015). ‘I know that the natives must suffer every now and then’: Native/non-native indexing language ideologies in Finnish higher education. In S. Dimova, A. K. Hultgren, & C. Jensen (Eds.), English-medium instruction in European higher education (pp. 291–316). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Moncada-Comas, B., & Block, D. (2019). CLIL-ised EMI in practice: Issues arising. The Language Learning Journal.
Montgomery, J., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82–99.
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.
Pulcini, V., & Campagna, S. (2015). Internationalisation and the EMI controversy in Italian higher education. In S. Dimova, A. K. Hultgren, & C. Jensen (Eds.), English-medium instruction in European higher education (pp. 65–87). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Riazi, M., & Candlin, C. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173.
Sancho Guinda, C., & Breeze, R. (2017). Introduction: Making essential competencies visible in higher education. In R. Breeze & C. Sancho-Guinda (Eds.), Essential competencies for English-medium university teaching, (pp. 1–16). Switzerland: Springer.
Tatzl, D. (2011). English-medium masters’ programmes at an Austrian university of applied sciences: Attitudes, experiences and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 252–270.
Trent, J. (2010). Teacher identity construction across the curriculum: promoting cross-curriculum collaboration in English-medium schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(2), 167–183.
Tsou, W., & Kao, Sh-M. (2017). English as a medium of instruction in higher education. Singapore: Springer.
Tsui, C. (2017). EMI teacher development programmes. In W. Tsou & S.-M. Kao (Eds.), English as a medium of instruction in higher education (pp. 165–182). Singapore: Springer.
University of Lleida (2012). Pla operatiu d’internacionalització de la Universitat de Lleida, 2012–16. Retrieved from [URL] [Accessed 22 January 2019].
(2013). Pla operatiu per al multilingüisme a la UdL, 2013–18. Retrieved from [URL]. [Accessed 18 May 2017].
(2014). Normativa de l’avaluació i la qualificació de la docència en els graus i màsters a la UdL. Retrieved from [URL] [Accessed 22 January 2019].
Walker, E. (2010). Evaluation of a support intervention for senior secondary school English. System, 38(1), 50–62.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Abouzeid, Reema, Cassi Liardet & Victor Khachan
Abouzeid, Reema, Cassi Liardét & Victor Khachan
2024. Lebanese EMI instructors’ role identity and teaching practices. Journal of English-Medium Instruction 3:2 ► pp. 164 ff.
Fernández-Córdoba, Anna Isabel & Guzman Mancho-Barés
Oria Alonso, Carmela & Lucila María Pérez Fernández
Aguilar-Pérez, Marta & Elisabet Arnó-Macià
Gronchi, Michela
Lasagabaster, David & Alberto Fernández-Costales
Lasagabaster, David & Alberto Fernández-Costales
Llurda, Enric & Vasilica Mocanu
Lohan, Rhona Patricia & Emma Dafouz
Mocanu, Vasilica & Alexandra Vraciu
He, Zhenhui & Mian Ahmad Jan
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
