Article published In: Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
Vol. 8:1 (2020) ► pp.28–52
Mapping lecturer questions and their pedagogical goals in Spanish- and English-medium instruction
Published online: 31 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18016.san
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18016.san
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between teacher questioning practices and pedagogical objectives in
Spanish- and English-medium lectures. The results obtained from the analysis of 16 lectures delivered by the same two
university teachers both in Spanish and English reveal that the use of questions could be exploited more effectively for
pedagogical purposes. Consequently, this paper tries to raise teachers’ awareness of the role of questions upon their
teaching and their students’ learning process.
Keywords: questions, EMI, classroom discourse, pedagogical goals, teacher education
Resumen
Este artículo explora la relación entre las preguntas de los profesores y los objetivos pedagógicos
en las clases de contenido en inglés. Los resultados obtenidos del análisis de 16 clases impartidas por los dos
profesores universitarios, tanto en español como en inglés, revelan que el uso de las preguntas se podría utilizar más
eficazmente con fines pedagógicos. En consecuencia, este estudio intenta sensibilizar a los profesores sobre el papel de
las preguntas en su enseñanza y en el proceso de aprendizaje de sus alumnos.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 2.1Teaching and learning as an interactive process
- 2.2Questions as a lens to study classroom interaction and learning
- 2.3Interweaving classroom discourse and pedagogical goals
- 3.Research study and methodology
- 3.1Context and research questions
- 3.2Design and participants
- 3.3Data collection, analysis and taxonomies
- 4.Results: Questions and pedagogical goals in university lectures
- 4.1Managerial mode
- 4.2Materials mode
- 4.3Skills and System mode
- 4.4Classroom Context mode
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Concluding remarks and pedagogical implications
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (65)
Ament, J. R., & Pérez Vidal, C. (2015). Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on Economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47–67.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 21, 8–14.
Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Journal of Literacy and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257.
Cammarata, L., & Ó Ceallaigh, T. J. (2018). Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and teacher educators. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 153–161.
Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. (2012). Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269.
Chang, Y. (2012). The use of questions by lecturers in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes, 311, 103–116.
Cheng, S. W. (2012). ‘That’s it for today’: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 234–248.
Christie, F. (2005). Language education in the primary years. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2007). The language of business studies lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2004). Interactive discourse structuring in L2 guest lectures: Some insights from a comparative corpus-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 183–199.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Dafouz, E., & Sánchez-García, D. (2013). ‘Does everybody understand?’ Teacher questions across disciplines in English-medium university lectures: An exploratory study. Language Value, 5(1), 129–151.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2020). ROAD-MAPPING English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave-McMillan.
Delicado Puerto, G., & Pavón, V. (2015). La implantación de titulaciones bilingües en la educación superior: El caso de la formación didáctica del profesorado bilingüe de primaria en la universidad de Extremadura. Educación y Futuro, 321, 35–64.
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2013). English-Medium instruction at universities: Global challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Du Bois, J. W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, S. Cumming, & Paolino, D. (1993). Outline of discourse transcription. In J. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher questioning behavior and student learning: What research says to teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM.
Fortanet, I., & Bellés, B. (2005). Spoken academic discourse: An approach to research on lectures. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, volumen monográfico1, 161–178.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Hall, J. K. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 206–232.
Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). What is scaffolding? In J. Hammond (Ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in language and literacy education (pp.1–14). Newtown, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
He, A. W., & Young, R. (1998). Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. In R. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Howard, A. (2010). Is there such a thing as a typical language lesson? Classroom Discourse, 11, 82–100.
Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kramsch, C. (1986). From language proficiency to competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372.
Kunioshi, N., Noguchi, J., Tojo, K., & Hayashi, H. (2016). Supporting English-medium pedagogy through an online corpus of science and engineering lectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(3), 293–303.
Lantolf, J. P. (2011). The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition and L2 development. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 24–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lee, J. (2009). Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 42–57.
Lorenzo, F. (2007). An analytical framework of language integration in L2 content- based courses. Language and Education, 211, 502–513.
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behaviour tracking methodology for CA-for- SLA. Applied Linguistics, 291, 404–427.
McComas, W. F., & Abraham, L. (2004). Asking more effective questions. Rossier School of Education. <[URL]>
Morell, T. (2007). What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 222–237.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Morton, T. (2012). Classroom talk, conceptual change and teacher reflection in bilingual science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 281, 101–110.
Oksaar, E. (1990). Language contact and culture contact: Towards an integrative approach in second language acquisition research. In H. Dechert (Ed.), Current trends in European second language acquisition research (pp. 230–243). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Sánchez-García, D. (2010). Classroom interaction in university settings: The case of questions in three disciplines (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. <[URL]>
(2016). A contrastive analysis of Spanish and English-medium instruction in tertiary education: Teacher discourse strategies in a spoken corpus (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. <[URL]>
(2018). Teacher questioning: Exploring student interaction and cognitive engagement in Spanish and EMI university lectures. Porta Linguarum, Monográfico III, 103–120.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the second language classroom: A conversational analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taguchi, N. (2014). English-medium education in the global society: An introduction. Special issue of International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52(2), 89–98.
Thompson, S. (1994). Frameworks and contexts a genre-based approach to analyzing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 171–187.
(1998). Why ask questions in monologue? Language choice at work in scientific and linguistic talk. In S. Hunston (Ed.), Language at work (pp. 137–150). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Tsui, A. (1992). A functional description of questions. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp. 89–110). London: Routledge.
Van Compernolle, R. (2015). Interaction and second language development: A Vygotskian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Der Walt, C. (2013). Multilingual higher education: Beyond English medium orientations. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Walsh, S., & Lowing, K. (2008). Talking to learn or learning to talk: PGCE students’ development of interactional competence. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Herriott Watt University, Edinburgh.
Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 1–20.
Wegerif, R. (2010). Mind-expanding: Teaching for thinking and creativity. Buckingham: Open University Press/Mcgraw Hill.
(2011). Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), 179–195.
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, B. M. (2016). Display and referential questions: Effects on student responses. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(4), 160–189.
Cited by (12)
Cited by 12 other publications
Lasagabaster, David & Ada Bier
Lasagabaster, David & Alberto Fernández-Costales
Lasagabaster, David & Alberto Fernández-Costales
Costa, Francesca & Cristina Mariotti
Doiz, Aintzane & David Lasagabaster
Khan, Sarah & Marta Aguilar-Pérez
Lasagabaster, David & Aintzane Doiz
Lasagabaster, David & Aintzane Doiz
Sun, Wanting, Jinghe Han, Christina Curry & Kay Carroll
Zuaro, Beatrice
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
