Article published In: Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and teacher educators
Edited by Laurent Cammarata and T.J. Ó Ceallaigh
[Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 6:2] 2018
► pp. 244–268
Teacher adaptations to support students with special education needs in French immersion
An observational study
Published online: 23 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17011.mad
https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17011.mad
Abstract
As of late, French immersion (FI) teachers have been encouraged to adapt their instruction to support the inclusion and success of
students with learning difficulties. In particular, pedagogical concepts such as Universal Design for Learning (UDL) (National
Center on Universal Design for Learning, 2014) and differentiated instruction (Tomlinson, C. (2004). La
classe
différenciée. Montreal: Chenelière/McGraw-Hill.) have been promoted as means to do so. This study used observations of nine FI teachers’ classes with the view to
exploring their adaptations for students with learning difficulties in hopes of identifying future professional development
directions. The observations revealed that the FI teachers were aptly adapting their instruction for the class as a whole whereas
they were less apt to modify for individual students. In order to further their inclusive practices, the FI teachers in this study
would benefit from future professional development opportunities that focus on differentiating instruction for individuals and
conversations about if and how teacher language choices can provide additional means of differentiation.
Article outline
- 1.Framework
- 2.Context of the study
- 2.1Context as defined in policy documents
- 2.1.1Universal design for learning and differentiated instruction
- 2.2Practical context of the study
- 2.1Context as defined in policy documents
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Observation scheme
- 3.2Participants
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Classroom observations
- 4.1.1Description of classes
- 4.1.2Adaptations observed
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (62)
Allen, P., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1983). The
communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation
scheme. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Arnett, K. (2001). The
accommodation of Grade 9 students with learning disabilities in the applied grade 9 core French
classroom. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
(2003). Teacher
adaptations in core French: A case study of one grade 9 class. The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
60
(2), 173–98.
(2004). Effective
teaching and adaptive instruction in core French: A case study of a Grade 8 classroom in
Ontario. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
(2008). Exploring
the use of student perspectives to inform topics in teacher education. Canadian Journal of
Applied
Linguistics,
11
(1), 63–82.
(2010). Scaffolding
in a grade 8 core French classroom: An exploratory case study. The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
66
(4), 557–582.
(2013a). The
genesis and perpetuation of exemptions and transfers from French second language programs for students with diverse learning
needs: A preliminary examination and their link to
inclusion. In K. Arnett & C. Mady (Eds). Minority
populations in Canadian second language
education (pp. 103–117). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
(2013b). Languages for all: How to support and challenge students in a second language classroom. Toronto: ON: Pearson Education.
Arnett, K., & Mady, C. (2010). A
critically conscious examination of special education within FSL and its relevance to FSL teacher education
programs. Canadian Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
13
(1), 19–36.
Arnett, K., Mady, C., & Muilenburg, L. (2014). Canadian
FSL teacher candidate beliefs about students with learning difficulties. Theory and Practice in
Language
Studies,
4
(3), 447–457.
Arnett, K., & Turnbull, M. (2008). Teacher
beliefs in second and foreign language teaching: A state of the art
review. In H. J. Sisken (Ed.), From
thought to action: Exploring beliefs and outcomes in the foreign language
program (pp. 9–29). Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle.
Baker, C. (2006). Foundations
of bilingual education and bilingualism. (4th ed.). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Bonyun, R., Momison, F., & Unitt, J. (1986). When
primary pupils transfer out of Immersion. Ottawa, ON: Ottawa Board of Education, Research Centre.
Bournot-Trites, M., & Denizot, I. (2005, January). Conscience
phonologique en immersion française au Canada. Paper presented at
the
1er Colloque International de Didactique Cognitive
, Toulouse,
France.
Bruck, M. (1985). Predictors
of transfer out of early French immersion programs. Applied
Psycholinguistics,
6
1, 39–61.
Burge, P., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Hutchinson, N., & Box, H. (2008). A
quarter century of inclusive education for children with intellectual disabilities in Ontario: Public
perceptions. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and
Policy,
87
1, 1–22.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). A
holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction. The Modern Language
Journal,
95
1, 339–343.
Clyne, R. (2011). There
is too many in Australia. In C. Hélot & M. O’Laoire (Eds.), Language
policy for the multilingual
classroom (pp. 174–187). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Cummins, J. (2007). Rethinking
monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied
Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique
Appliquée,
10
(2), 221–240.
Genesee, F. (1992). Second/foreign
language immersion and at-risk English-speaking children. Foreign Language
Annals,
25
(3), 199–213.
(2007). French
immersion and at-risk students: A review of research evidence. The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
63
(5), 655–688.
Genesee, F., & Fortune, T. (2014). Bilingual
education and at-risk students. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language
Education,
2
(2), 196–209.
Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated
instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Harley, B. (1998). French
immersion research in Canada: The 1990s in
perspective. Mosaic,
6
(1), 3–10.
Hayden, H. M. R. (1988). French
immersion drop-outs: Perspectives of parents, students, and teachers. Reading
Canada,
6
(4), 222–235.
Hélot, C., & Ó’Laoire, M. (2011). From
language education policy to a pedagogy of the possible. In C. Hélot & M. Ó’Laoire (Eds.), Language
policy for the multilingual classroom: Pedagogy of the
possible (pp. xi–xxv). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Johnson, K. E. (1999). Understanding
language teaching: Reasoning in action. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Lapkin, S., MacFarlane, A., & Vandergrift, L. (2006). Teaching
French in Canada: FSL teachers’ perspectives. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Teachers’ Federation.
Lyster, R., Collins, L., & Ballinger, S. (2009). Linking
languages through a bilingual read-aloud project. Language
Awareness,
18
1, 366–383.
MacCoubrey, S. J., Wade-Woolley, L., Klinger, D., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Early
identification of at-risk L2 readers. The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
61
1, 11–28.
MacCoubrey, S. J., Wade-Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. R. (2007). A
phonemic awareness intervention for at-risk second language readers in French immersion (Unpublished
manuscript). Queen’s University, Kingston, ON.
Mady, C., & Arnett, K. (2009). Inclusion
in French immersion in Canada: One parent’s perspective. Exceptionality Education
International,
19
(2), 37–49.
(2015). Supporting
Allophone students and students with learning difficulties in the second language classroom: FSL teacher candidates’ beliefs
and knowledge. Canadian Journal of Applied
Linguistics
18
(2), 78–95.
Mannavarayan, J. M. (2002). The
French immersion debate: French for all or all for
French? Calgary: Detselig Enterprises.
Mollica, A., Philips, G., & Smith, M. (2005). Teaching
and learning French as a second language: Core French in the elementary schools in Ontario. Report
prepared for the Ontario Modern Language Teachers’ Association.
National Center on Universal Design for
Learning (2014a). What is UDL? Retrieved
from <[URL]>
. (2014b). Universal design for learning
guidelines. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Ó Duibhir, P., Ní Dhíorbháin, A., & Cosgrove, J. (2016). An
inductive approach to grammar teaching in Grade 5 and 6 Irish immersion classes. Journal of
Immersion and Content-based Language
Education,
4
(1), 13–32.
Ontario Ministry of Education (1999). The
Ontario curriculum: French as a second language. Toronto, ON: Author.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2013a). A
framework for French as a second language in Ontario schools Toronto, ON: Author.
. (2015). Including students with special education needs in French as a
second language education programs. Toronto, ON: Author.
Parkin, M., Morrison, F., & Watkin, G. (1987). French
Immersion research relevant to decisions in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Education.
Public Service Commission of Canada
[PSCC] (2005). Second language evaluation: A research evaluation of French as a
second language in selected Alberta schools. Ottawa, ON: Author.
Reeder, K., & Bournot-Trites, M. (2001). Biliterate
and mathematical performance in an intensified French immersion education program: Some evidence for the interdependence
hypothesis. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), BUCLD
21: Proceedings of the 21st annual Boston University Conference on Language
Development (pp. 567–571). Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Rix, J., & Sheehy, K. (2014). Nothing
special: The everyday pedagogy of teaching. In L. Florian (Ed.) The
Sage handbook of special
education (pp. 459–474). London: Sage.
Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). Communicative
orientation of language teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and
applications. Sydney, Australia: Natioal Centre for English Language Teaching and research, Macquarie University.
Swain, M., & Johnson, R. K. (1997). Immersion
education: A category within bilingual education. In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion
education: International
perspectives (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2005). The
evolving sociopolitical context of immersion education in Canada: Some implications for program
development. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics,
15
(2), 169–186.
Trites, R., & Moretti, P. (1986). Assessment
of readiness for primary French immersion. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Education.
Turnbull, M., Hart, D., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Grade
3 immersion students’ performance in literacy and mathematics: Province-wide results from Ontario
(1998–99). The Canadian Modern Language
Review,
58
1, 9–26.
Turnbull, R., Turnbull, A., Shank, M., Smith, S., & Leal, D. (2002). Exceptional
lives: Special education in today’s schools (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.
Valle, J., & Conner, D. (2010). Rethinking
disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices (a practical guide). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1995). Problemy defectologii [Problems of
defectology]. Moscow, Russia: Prosvecshenie Press.
Wall, A. (2010). Myths
and realities of French immersion. Language Portal of
Canada. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Willms, D. (2008). The
case for universal French instruction. Canadian Research Institute for Social Policy. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
De la Fuente-González, Sara, David Menéndez Álvarez-Hevia & Alejandro Rodríguez-Martín
Lindner, Katharina-Theresa & Susanne Schwab
Nic Aindriú, Sinéad
Fovet, Frederic
Nic Aindriú, Sinéad, Lorraine Connaughton-Crean, Pádraig Ó Duibhir & Joe Travers
Selvachandran, Janani, Elizabeth Kay-Raining Bird, Jessica DeSousa & Xi Chen
Kay-Raining Bird, Elizabeth, Fred Genesee, Ann Sutton, Xi Chen, Joan Oracheski, Stephanie Pagan, Bonita Squires, Diana Burchell & Tamara Sorenson Duncan
2021. Access and outcomes of children with special education needs in Early French Immersion. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 9:2 ► pp. 193 ff.
Martin, Sarah, Christina Hodder, Emily Merritt, Ashley Culliton, Erin Pottie & Elizabeth Kay-Raining Bird
2021. Bilingual outcomes for a student with Down Syndrome in French immersion. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 9:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
