Cover not available

Article published In: The Journal of Internationalization and Localization
Vol. 6:1 (2019) ► pp.1–24

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Transferring web accessibility through localization and internationalization standards

 | University of Salamanca
 | University of Geneva
Published online: 16 May 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jial.19002.tor
Abstract
In recent years, translation and localization studies have started to include accessibility, and web accessibility in particular, as one of the key aspects to take into consideration when adapting a web product to another language and culture (web localization). This paper provides a comprehensive insight of the connections between these two fields and concepts and, above all, it discusses the possibility of transferring accessibility throughout the localization process. In particular, we analyze how the use of current localization and internationalization data exchange standards is connected to this notion of transfer, and how those standards may be capable of transferring accessibility qualities or information, or supporting localizers in their task. Finally, we present an analytical and pragmatic approach to explore this transferability challenge, which includes the study of the techniques proposed by the W3C to help web developers fulfil a set of success criteria that are included in the latest Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, in relation to their possible integration in localization and internationalization standards.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background and motivation
    • 2.1Content and affordances in web accessibility and localization
    • 2.2Accessibility guidelines
    • 2.3Multilingual information exchange standards
  • 3.Theoretical approach
    • 3.1Language- and culture-bound access barriers and pathways
    • 3.2Transferring accessible content in localization
    • 3.3Transfer or support?
      • 3.3.1Supporting accessibility features: A few examples
      • 3.3.2Provisional conclusions regarding accessibility transfer or support in localization
    • 3.4Challenging localization context and agency
  • 4.Methodological approach
  • 5.Preliminary insights: XLIFF and ITS transfer and support for accessibility content
    • 5.1Accessibility transfer and support capabilities
    • 5.2Accessibility transfer and support limitations and opportunities
  • 6.Conclusions and future work
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Filip, David, and Ján Husarčík. 2018. TAPICC. XLIFF 2 Extraction and Merging Best Practice, Version 1.0. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
Fundación SIDAR. 2009. Pautas de Accesibilidad para el Contenido Web (WCAG) 2.0. Spanish Candidate Translation for the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 of the W3C. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
Gouadec, Daniel. 2002. “Training Translators: Certainties, Uncertainties, Dilemmas.” In Training the Language Service Providers for the New Millenium, by Belinda Maia, Johann Haller and Margherita Ullrych, 31–41. Porto: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutiérrez y Restrepo, Emmanuelle, and Loïc Martínez Normand. 2010. “Localization and Web Accessibility.” Tradumàtica: traducció i tecnologies de la informació i la comunicació 81: 1–6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiménez-Crespo, Miguel Ángel. 2013. Translation and Web Localization. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaptelinin, Victor. 2014. Affordances and Design. Georgia: Interaction Design.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koby, Geoffrey S., Paul Fields, Daryl Hague, Arle Lommel, and Alan Melby. 2014. “Defining Translation Quality.” Tradumàtica: traducció i tecnologies de la informació I la comunicació 121: 413–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morado Vázquez, Lucía, and David Filip. 2018. XLIFF Version 2.1 Support in CAT Tools. Subcommittee Report, OASIS XLIFF Promotion and Liaison Subcommittee.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morón, Marián, and Elisa Calvo. 2017. “Introducing Transcreation Skills in Translator Training Contexts: A Situated Project-based Approach.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 291: 126–148.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy. 2009. Issues in Translation Studies. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jakob. 2012. Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Accessed September 14, 2018. [URL]
Norman, Don. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ó Broin, Ultan. 2004. “Accessibility Is Just Another Language.” Multilingual Computing and Technology 15 (3): 17–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OASIS XLIFF TC. 2018. XLIFF 2.1. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
Ray, Rebecca, and Donald A. DePalma. 2017. Localization Maturity Model. Release 3.0. Common Sense Advisory.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Vázquez, Silvia. 2016. “Assuring Accessibility during Web Localisation: an Empirical Investigation on the Achievement of Appropriate Text Alternatives for Images”. PhD dissertation. Universidad de Salamanca/Université de Genève.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Vázquez, Silvia, and Jesús Torres-del-Rey. 2014. “Fostering Accessibility through Web Localization.” Multilingual Computing and Technology 25 (7): 32–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tercedor Sánchez, Maribel. 2010. “Translating Web Multimodalities: Towards Inclusive Web Localization.” Tradumàtica: traducció i tecnologies de la informació i la comunicación 81: 1–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres-del-Rey, Jesús, and Lucía Morado Vázquez. 2015. “XLIFF and the Translator: Why Does it Matter?” Tradumàtica: traducció i tecnologies de la informació i la comunicación 131. 584–607.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres-del-Rey, Jesús, and Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez. 2013. “Traducción y accesibilización de discurso público en formato web.” In Traducción, política(s), conflictos: legados y retos para la era del multiculturalismo, by María Carmen Claramonte, África Vidal, María Rosario and Martín Ruano, 121–14. Granada: Comares.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “New insights into translation-oriented, technology-intensive localiser education: accessibility as an opportunity.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM ’16), 971–978. New York: ACM Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres-del-Rey, Jesús, Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez, María del Mar Sánchez Ramos, Lucía Morado Vázquez, Manuel Mata Pastor, Luis García Nevares, and Emilio Rodríguez V. de Aldana. 2018. “Educación para la accesibilidad en localización web: el proyecto ALMA.” Paper presented at the Seminario Internacional sobre Traducción y Accesibilidad al Patrimonio (SITAP 2018), Granada, Spain, March 2018.
W3C. 2013. Internationalization Tag Set (ITS) Version 2.0. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
. 2016a. Techniques for WCAG 2.0. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
. 2016b. H37: Using alt attributes on img elements. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
. 2016c. Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
. 2017. Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.1. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
. 2018. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
WAI. 2018a. Evaluating Web Accessibility Overview. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
. 2018b. WCAG 2 Documents. Edited by Shawn Lawton Henry. Accessed August 28, 2018. [URL]
. 2018c. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview. Accessed june 28, 2018. [URL]
Wilson, Chauncey. 2007. “The Problem with Usability Problems: Context is Critical.” Interactions – Societal Interfaces: Solving Problems, Affecting Change 14 (5): 46–ff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Dept, Steve, Andrea Ferrari, Manuel Souto Pico & Danina Lupsa
2025. Translation in Computer-Based International Large-Scale Assessment: Not a Stand-Alone Component. In Innovative Digital-Based International Large-Scale Assessments [Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment, ], ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Bei
2024. Using media accessibility as a stimulus for teaching audio-visual translation: a Singapore case study. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 18:4 ► pp. 618 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Pei, Qingxin Xia, Kui Liu, Juncai Guo, Xin Wang, Jin Liu, John Grundy & Li Li
2023. Towards automated Android app internationalisation: An exploratory study. Journal of Systems and Software 197 ► pp. 111559 ff. DOI logo
Vázquez, Lucía Morado & Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez
2023. Health Websites for All. In Translation Technology in Accessible Health Communication, ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
O’Hagan, Minako, Julie McDonough Dolmaya & Hendrik J. Kockaert
2019. Pandemic, localization and change of guard. The Journal of Internationalization and Localization 6:2 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue