Cover not available

Review published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 9:1 (2008) ► pp.164170

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (10)
References
Bach, Ulrich. 1997. Englische Flugtexte im 17. Jahrhundert: Historisch-pragmatische Untersuchungen zur frühen Massenkommunikation. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bremer, Kai. 2005. Religionsstreitigkeiten. Volkssprachliche Kontroversen zwischen altgläubigen und evangelischen Theologen im 16. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo. 1989. Controversies as quasi-dialogues. In: Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher (eds.). Dialoganalyse II. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 147–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Strategies of dispute and ethics: Du tort and La place d’autruy . In: Akten des VI. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses, Bd. 21. Hannover: Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, 108–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dieckmann, Walther. 2005. Streiten über das Streiten. Normative Grundlagen polemischer Meta-kommunikation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H. Tristram Jr. and Arthur L. Caplan (eds.). 1987. Scientific Controversies. Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd. 2003. Dialogical structures in 17th century controversies. In: Marina Bondi and Sorin Stati (eds.). Dialogue Analysis 2000. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 199–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gloning, Thomas. 1999. The pragmatic form of religious controversies around 1600. A case study in the Osiander vs. Scherer & Rosenbusch controversy. In: Andreas H. Jucker, Gerd Fritz and Franz Lebsanft (eds.). Historical Dialogue Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 81–110.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Early modern controversies and theories of controversy. The rules of the game and the role of the persons. In: Pierluigi Barrotta and Marcelo Dascal (eds.). Controversies and Subjectivity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 263–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldenbaum, Ursula (ed.). 2004. Appell an das Publikum. Die Öffentliche Debatte in der deutschen Aufklärung 1687–1796. 21 vols. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue