Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 8:1 (2007) ► pp.109–126
Concepts for analyzing deception in discourse intended to be persuasive
Two case studies from Shakespearean drama
Published online: 6 February 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.8.1.06rud
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.8.1.06rud
The article examines two episodes from Shakespeare, one from Julius Caesar and the other one from Othello, in order to shed light on the nature of a type of deception often used by a speaker in discourse meant to persuade a hearer to adopt a particular course of action. Drawing on the episodes, two conceptual distinctions are proposed, one between overt and covert intentions and the other between first-order and second-order intentions. It is argued that the distinctions make it possible to formulate a structured framework for analyzing the type of deception in question. The model proposed also draws on Gricean maxims, emphasizing the role of the maxims of Quality and Quantity, first part.
Keywords: Gricean maxims, Shakespeare, deception, drama, information manipulation, persuasion
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Culpeper, Jonathan & Sean Murphy
Rudanko, Juhani & Paul Rickman
2024. A manipulative technique in a congressional debate. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 86 ff.
Rudanko, Juhani & Paul Rickman
Beville, Aoife
Kizelbach, Urszula
2020. Blunders and (un)intentional offence in Shakespeare. In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 312], ► pp. 75 ff.
Kizelbach, Urszula
2024. The pragmatics of royal discourse in William Shakespeare’s Henry vi
. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
