Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 8:1 (2007) ► pp.25–41
Telling tales
The role of scribes in constructing the discourse of the Salem witchcraft trials
Published online: 6 February 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.8.1.03dot
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.8.1.03dot
This study examines the practices of scribes who recorded the examinations of those accused of witchcraft in Salem in 1692. The data consists of 68 records of examinations held between March and October 1692 and in January 1693. Each record is coded for two features: use of contextual commentary and evaluative adjectives or adverbs which suggest attitudes and values of the scribes and reflect the pragmatic context. Records are also coded according to presentation in direct discourse or reported discourse. Records presented in direct discourse and those occurring in the early period of the trials contain the greatest number of both contextual commentary and evaluative/subjective adjectives or adverbs. The analysis reveals that the majority of the records are written by four identified scribes.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Varga, Mónika
Thomas, Jenelle
Willumsen, Liv Helene
Doty, Kathleen L.
2018. Chapter 1. Pleading for life. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 21 ff.
Inoue, Miyako
Kurzon, Dennis & Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
Marcus, Imogen
Marcus, Imogen
Tachino, Tosh
Grund, Peter J.
Grund, Peter J.
Peikola, Matti
Doty, Kathleen L. & Risto Hiltunen
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
