Article published In: The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Corinne Rossari
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6:2] 2005
► pp. 188–210
The journey of non-standard discourse markers in Quebec French
Networks based on exemplification
Published online: 10 June 2005
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.6.2.03vin
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.6.2.03vin
In this study, I look at the history of several non-standard discourse markers in Quebec French. I attempt to explain how certain markers have become specialized so as to take on a conventional role in spoken discourse. Furthermore, my current interest focuses on discourse markers and their relationship with discursive structures.
I will illustrate the organization of discursive “networks” through the presentation of two case studies, the exemplification/opposition network — from the study of par exemple —, and the exemplification/approximation network, from the study of mettons, disons, comme, genre and style.
Data are taken from sociolinguistic corpora of French spoken in Montreal, which total approximately 300 hours of sociolinguistic interviews carried out in 1971, 1984 and 1995 with speakers who are representative of the Montreal francophone sociolinguistic community.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Deng, Delin, Fenqi Wang & Ratree Wayland
Degand, Liesbeth & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers?. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
Levey, Stephen, Karine Groulx & Joseph Roy
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline, Liesbeth Degand, Benjamin Fagard & Liesbeth Mortier
Prevost, Sophie
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
