Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 5:1 (2004) ► pp.107–136
Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance
A cross-register comparison
Published online: 8 March 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.06bib
English has a rich supply of grammatical devices used to express “stance”: epistemic or attitudinal comments on propositional information. The present paper explores historical change in the preferred devices used to mark stance. By examining the entire system of stance devices, the study attempts to investigate the underlying patterns of change. Three major patterns are possible: 1) changes in social norms could result in speakers and writers expressing stance meanings to differing extents in different periods; 2) the grammatical system for the expression of stance could undergo change, showing an overall decline in the use of some grammatical devices, replaced by an increase in the use of other devices; 3) the patterns of use could undergo sharper register diversification over time, with particular stance devices taking on more specialized uses in particular registers. These possibilities are explored through corpus-based analysis of the written and speech-based registers in the ARCHER corpus, tracking the patterns of change across the past three centuries.
Cited by (79)
Cited by 79 other publications
Brems, Lieselotte
2025. Review of Landert (2024): Methods in Historical Corpus Pragmatics: Epistemic Stance in Early Modern English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 425 ff.
Kurt, Berker & Hüseyin Kafes
Opeyemi Olajimbiti, Ezekiel & Samuel Olayiwola Ayoola
Pan, Fan & Xinyi Zhou
Peikola, Matti & Mari-Liisa Varila
2025. Presenting manuscript tables and diagrams to the Middle English reader. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 26:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Vela-Rodrigo, Alberto
Yakushkina, Maria
Chung, Tieu Thuy & Peter R. Crosthwaite
Eguchi, Masaki & Kristopher Kyle
Metslang, Helle, Külli Habicht, Tiit Hennoste, Kirsi Laanesoo-Kalk, Külli Prillop, Andriela Rääbis & Carl Eric Simmul
Tang, Li & Yu-Yin Hsu
Conrad, Susan
Egbert, Jesse, Bethany Gray & Tove Larsson
Sierra, Sylvia
Whitehouse, Marlies
Wu, Juanjuan & Fan Pan
Wu, Juanjuan & Fan Pan
Hiltunen, Turo
2022. Towards a local grammar of stance expression in Late Modern English medical writing. In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330], ► pp. 127 ff.
Maslov, Boris & Tatiana Nikitina
Riccioni, Ilaria, Andrzej Zuczkowski, Roberto Burro, Ramona Bongelli & Claudia Felser
Xu, Fang & Rongping Cao
YAKUT, İlyas & Fatma YUVAYAPAN
Zhan, Fangqiong
2022. A constructional account of the development of the Chinese stance discourse markerběnlái. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:2 ► pp. 245 ff.
Martín de la Rosa, Victoria & Elena Domínguez Romero
Park, Jungyoung & Zhihui Fang
ÇİFTÇİ, Hatime & Erdem AKBAŞ
Hsieh, Miao-Ling & Yu-Fang Wang
2020. Acquiring the polysemous adverb HAI in Chinese by English-speaking, Japanese-speaking, and Korean-speaking CSL learners. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 46:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Wright, Heidi R.
2020. Stand-alone literature reviews. In Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 95], ► pp. 307 ff.
YUVAYAPAN, Fatma & Ceyhun YÜKSELİR
Dong, Jihua & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
Berry, James
Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert & Meixiu Zhang
2018. Lexis and grammar as complementary discourse systems for expressing stance and evaluation. In The Construction of Discourse as Verbal Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 296], ► pp. 201 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Meixiu Zhang
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Laura Vincze & Andrzej Zuczkowski
Enghels, Renata & María Elena Azofra Sierra
2018. Sobre la naturaleza de los corpus y la comparabilidad de resultados en lingüística histórica. Spanish in Context 15:3 ► pp. 465 ff.
Fuoli, Matteo
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
Kiesling, Scott F., Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Jim Fitzpatrick, Xiaochuang Han & Jacob Eisenstein
Riccioni, Ilaria, Ramona Bongelli, Gill Philip & Andrzej Zuczkowski
Ushchyna, Valentyna
Włodarczyk, Matylda & Irma Taavitsainen
Bisang, Walter
2016. Finiteness, nominalization, and information structure. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language, 113], ► pp. 13 ff.
Chen, Guohua & Suping Duan
2016. Chapter 5. Decoding the parentheses in Shakespeare’s Coriolanus. In Linguistics and Literary History [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 25], ► pp. 87 ff.
Lukač, Morana
Terblanche, Lize
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania
Alonso Almeida, Francisco & Margarita Mele-Marrero
2014. Stancetaking in seventeenth-century prefaces on obstetrics. Journal of Historical Pragmatics ► pp. 1 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Shelley Staples
2014. Exploring the prosody of stance. In Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 61], ► pp. 271 ff.
Kádár, Dániel Z.
Kádár, Dániel Z.
Veirano Pinto, Marcia
2014. Chapter 2.1 Dimensions of variation in North American movies. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 60], ► pp. 109 ff.
Yannuar, Nurenzia, Ida Ayu Shitadevi, Yazid Basthomi & Utami Widiati
조혜원
Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray
Wu, Yang & Zhoulin Ruan
Allwood, Jens, Massimo Chindamo & Elisabeth Ahlsen
Atkinson, Dwight & Ellen Valle
Chindamo, Massimo, Jens Allwood & Elisabeth Ahlsen
Gray, Bethany & Douglas Biber
Grund, Peter J.
Grund, Peter J.
Grund, Peter J.
2020. What it means to describe speech. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214], ► pp. 295 ff.
Lehto, Anu
2012. Review of Biber & Conrad (2009): Register, Genre, and Style. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Palander-Collin, Minna
Perrin, Daniel
Perrin, Daniel
Vis, Kirsten, José Sanders & Wilbert Spooren
Wang, Yu-Fang, David Goodman, Shih-Yao Chen & Yi-Hsuan Hsiao
Baumgarten, Nicole & Juliane House
Tottie, Gunnel & Sebastian Hoffmann
Barbieri, Federica
Mason, Peyton R. & Boyd H. Davis
Wilce, James M.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
