Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 5:1 (2004) ► pp.27–47
Triglossia and pragmatic variety choice in nineteenth-century Bruges
A case study in historical sociolinguistics
Published online: 8 March 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.03van
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.5.1.03van
This article deals with the roles and functions of dialect, Dutch and French for Flemish upper class writers in the 19th century.
It argues against the common opinion that the linguistic situation at that time in Flanders can be characterized by rigid dichotomies such as formal French versus informal dialectal/regional Dutch, and/or upper class French versus middle and lower class (dialectal) Dutch.
Analyses of original upper class documents from various archives in the town of Bruges lead to the assertion that the actual choices between the available linguistic resources were to a considerable extent dependent on contextual and pragmatic considerations. Examples taken from town council records, high society correspondence and election propaganda will illustrate the close link between variety choice and the wish to include/exclude certain social groups in distinct communicative settings.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Meluzzi, Chiara
Vosters, Rik
2016. Mitos de decadencia lingüística en la historia del neerlandés. Una exploración sociolingüística de la lengua en Flandes en los siglos xviii y xix / Myths of language decadence in Dutch history. A sociolinguistic exploration of language in Flanders in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. In Constructing Languages [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 13], ► pp. 265 ff.
Watts, Richard J.
Nordlund, Taru
Dewaele, Jean-Marc
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
