Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 3:2 (2002) ► pp.299–335
“I will tell, I will tell”
Confessional patterns in the Salem Witchcraft Trials, 1692
Published online: 3 June 2002
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.3.2.07dot
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.3.2.07dot
This study focuses on the records of confessions by individuals accused of witchcraft in Salem in 1692, both those presented in direct discourse and in reported discourse. We analyze the material from two viewpoints: the pragmatic features of the discourse and narrative structure and function. The data consists of 29 individual records, with eight cases selected for closer scrutiny. The records span the period from March through September 1692. In the pragmatic analysis we study the question and answer patterns from the point of view of the examiners and the accused.
The analysis of narrative patterns is based on Labov’s work in oral narratives. It provides a multilayered approach to understanding both the structure of the confessions and the spread of the witchcraft hysteria in Salem. The categories of orientation and complicating action reveal that each confession presents a vivid representation of the devil, the accused, and the sociohistorical context.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
Decarlo, Josephine & Grafton Eliason
Doty, Kathleen L.
2018. Chapter 1. Pleading for life. In Legal Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 288], ► pp. 21 ff.
Kurzon, Dennis & Barbara Kryk-Kastovsky
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
Grund, Peter J.
Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena
Doty, Kathleen L. & Risto Hiltunen
Grund, Peter
Grund, Peter
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
