Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 26:2 (2025) ► pp.232–261

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Volition ascription to the addressee in a diachronic perspective

A unifying hypothesis for some post-volitional developments of Latin uolo

ORCiD logo with link | University of Bologna
Published online: 24 March 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23012.del
Abstract
Pragmatic studies have recently shown that volition ascription to the addressee corresponds to specific strategies and deserves more attention. This paper discusses a series of post-volitional developments attested by second-person forms of the Latin verb uolo (‘I want’). Whilst these grammaticalisation phenomena — some of which are also attested cross-linguistically — have mainly been dealt with separately, this paper shows that they can be treated in a unified manner, as all originally employ volition ascription as a conversational strategy. In Latin, uolo constructions featuring the verb in the second person allowed the speaker to offer the addressee options to choose from or, in the case of prohibitive sentences, to preclude them from a specific choice. In this way, this paper sheds new light on volition ascription strategies as a pragmatic device and their diachronic developments in Latin as well as cross-linguistically.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The study of volition (with a focus on pragmatics)
  • 3.Five cases of grammaticalisation based on volition ascription to the addressee
    • 3.1The marker (-)uis
      • 3.1.1Free-choice indefinites
      • 3.1.2Quamuis
      • 3.1.3Sis
    • 3.2Uel
    • 3.3Prohibitive marker
  • 4.A new look at grammaticalised second-person forms of uolo
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (62)
References
Adams, James N. 1984. “Female Speech in Latin Comedy”. Antichthon 181: 43–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aloni, Maria. 2021. “Indefinites as Fossils: The Case of Wh-Based Free Choice”. In Chiara Gianollo, Klaus von Heusinger and Maria Napoli (eds), Determiners and Quantifiers: Functions, Variation, and Change, 214–245. Leiden and Boston: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s Semantic Map”. Linguistic Typology 2 (1): 79–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrios-Lech, Peter. 2016. Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broth, Mathias, Jakob Cromdal and Lena Levin. 2019. “Telling the Other’s Side: Formulating Others’ Mental States in Driver Training”. Language & Communication 651: 7–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia and Richard W. Janney. 1994. “Toward a Pragmatics of Emotive Communication”. Journal of Pragmatics 22 (3/4): 325–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Childs, Carrie. 2012a. “Directing and Requesting: Two Interactive Uses of the Mental State Terms ‘Want’ and ‘Need’”. Text & Talk 32 (6): 727–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “‘I’m Not X, I Just Want Y’: Formulating ‘Wants’ in Interaction”. Discourse Studies 14 (2): 181–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción. 2016. “Gramaticalización y cambio sintáctico”. In Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica (‘Encyclopedia of Hispanic Linguistics’), 515–526. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormany, Edward. 2012. “Velle-type Prohibitions in Latin: The Rise and Fall of a Morphosyntactic Conspiracy”. In Ans van Kemenade and Nynke de Haas (eds), Historical Linguistics 2009: Selected Papers from the 19th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 355–371. Nijmegen. 10–14 August 2009. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curl, Traci S. 2006. “Offers of Assistance: Constraints on Syntactic Design”. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (8): 1257–1280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 1998. “Any as Inherently Modal”. Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (5): 433–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degano, Marco and Maria Aloni. 2022. “Indefinites and Free Choice: When the Past Matters”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 401: 447–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dell’Oro, Francesca. Forthcoming. “A Comparative Approach to want-constructions as Sources of Reported-Speech and Reported-Thought Evidential Markers: Latin uolo vis-à-vis its Cognates German wollen and French vouloir”.
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2014. “‘Don’t Get Me Wrong’: Recipient Design by Using Negation to Constrain an Action’s Interpretation”. In Susanne Günther, Wolfgang Imo and Jörg Bücker (eds), Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation, 15–52. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf and Michael Haugh (eds). 2022. Action Ascription in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf and Julia Kaiser. 2022. “Intention Ascriptions as a Means to Coordinate Own Actions with Others’ Actions”. In Arnulf Deppermann and Michael Haugh (eds), Action Ascription in Interaction, 135–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devos, Maud and Daniël Van Olmen. 2013. “Describing and Explaining the Variation of Bantu Imperatives and Prohibitives”. Studies in Language 37 (1): 1–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 2019. “When Please Ceases to Be Polite: The Use of sis in Early Latin”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 20 (2): 204–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, Paul and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds). 2014. Requesting in Social Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara. 2021. “Conditional Clauses as Polite Modifiers in Latin: si placet between Pragmaticalization and Language Contact”. Transactions of the Philological Society 1191: 346–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fruyt, Michèle. 2004. “Some Cases of Grammaticalisation in Latin: Subordinating Conjunctions, Concessivity and Modal Lexemes”, Classica et mediaevalia (55): 301–322.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Grammaticalization in Latin”. In Ph. Baldi and P. Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, 661–864. (Volume 4: Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology.) Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara. 2018. Indefinites between Latin and Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harjunpää, Katariina. 2021. “Brokering Co-participants’ Volition in Request and Offer Sequences”. In Jan Lindström, Ritva Laury, Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen (eds), Intersubjectivity in Action, 135–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin and Ekkehard König. 1998. “Concessive Conditionals in the Languages of Europe”. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, 563–640. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. “Grammaticalization”. In Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 573–601. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist. 1951. Lateinische Umgangssprache (‘Colloquial Latin’). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On Some Principles of Grammaticalization”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization, 17–35. (Volume 11.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. 2017. “Clause Type and Illocutionary Force”. In Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, 851–945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H. and Paul Drew. 2016. “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1975. “The Evolution of Grammatical Categories”. In Jerzy Kuryłowicz (ed.), Esquisses linguistiques (‘Linguistic Sketches’), 38–54. (Volume II1.) Munich: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995 (1982). Thoughts on Grammaticalization. A Programmatic Sketch. Munich: Lincom Europa. (First published in the Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts, Volume 48, 1982.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu, Johann Baptist Hofmann and Anton Szantyr. 1977. Lateinische Grammatik (‘Latin Grammar’). (Volume 11.) Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Lateinische Grammatik (‘Latin Grammar’). (Volume 21.) Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
liv. 2001. Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben: die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen (‘Lexicon of Indo-European Verbs: The Roots and Their Primary Stem Formations’). Edited by Martin Kümmel and Helmut Rix. (Second edition.) Wiesbaden: L. Reichert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina and Caterina Mauri. 2022. “The Encoding of Irrelevance in Discourse: tanto between Concession and Justification”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 29 (2022): 151–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loeb Classical Library Database. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Accessed January 2025 at: [URL]
Matthews, Richard. 1991. Words and Worlds: On the Linguistic Analysis of Modality. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change: a Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 2016. “Analyses of the Modal Meanings”. In Jan Nuyts and Johan van der Auwera (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, 31–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
old (Oxford Latin Dictionary). 2016. (Edited by P. G. W. Glare.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax: The Simple Clause. (Volume 11.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. The Oxford Latin Syntax: The Complex Sentence and Discourse. (Volume 21.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 2015. “Grammaticalization”. In James D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 330–335. (Volume X1.) (Second edition.) Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah. 2009. “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-Part Modification — the Contribution of Particles”. In Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, 317–442. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz Yamuza, Emilia. 2022. “Parenthetical Conditionals and Insubordinate Clauses in Ancient Greek. Protasis with βούλομαι (boúlomai) and (ἐ)θέλω (ethélō)”. Journal of Greek Linguistics 22 (2): 232–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. (Second edition.) Oxford, UK and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga. 2005. La concession en latin (‘Concession in Latin’). Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. “Constructions in Grammaticalization”. In Brian Joseph and Richard Janda (eds), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Untermann, Jürgen. 2000. Wörterbuch des Oskisch-Umbrischen (‘Dictionary of Oscan-Umbrian’). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Horst, Joop M. 2008. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse syntaxis (‘History of Dutch Syntax’). Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walde, Alois and Johann Baptist Hofmann. 1965. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch (‘Latin Etymological Dictionary’). (Third edition.) Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pamuksaç, Aylin & Corinne Rossari
2025. Étude des verbes de volonté dans une démarche de linguistique de corpus. Lingvisticae Investigationes 48:1 ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue