Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 23:2 (2022) ► pp.245–284
A constructional account of the development of the Chinese stance discourse marker běnlái
Published online: 11 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.19008.zha
Abstract
This paper examines the emergence of the Chinese adverb běnlái and its further development into
a stance discourse marker (sdm). Most previous studies consider the epistemic modal adverb běnlái
(‘indeed, truly’) to have originated from the temporal adverb běnlái (‘originally’). Based on the framework of
constructionalisation (Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization
and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ) and Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet and Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. “On
Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change”. Studies in
Language 37 (3): 473–488. idea of multiple sources, I argue that the temporal adverb might not have
been the only source for the modal běnlái to occur. Furthermore, the modal adverb changed into an sdm,
thereby signaling the speaker’s subjective evaluation while linking the coherence of the discourse. I argue that the change was
enabled by both subjectification and analogisation. The exemplars to which běnlái was by hypothesis analogised
include the extant discourse connectives (e.g., kěshì) and the extant commentary pragmatic markers (e.g.,
kělián and suǒxìng) (. 2009. “An
Account of Discourse Markers”. International Review of
Pragmatics 1 (2): 293–320. ).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Some basic concepts of the framework
- 2.1Constructionalisation and constructional changes
- 2.2Diachronic pragmatics
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.Běnlái in Modern Chinese
- 5.Běnlái in the history of Chinese
- 5.1Běn and lái in Old Chinese
- 5.2The development of běnlái
- 6.The constructional account of the development of běnlái
- 6.1Subjectification
- 6.2Analogisation
- 6.2.1The extant discourse connectives
- 6.2.2The extant commentary pragmatic markers
- 6.3The constructional network of the stance discourse marker
- 7.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (65)
Andersen, Henning. 2001. “Actualization
and the (Uni)Directionality”. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization:
Linguistic Change in
Progress, 225–248. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Barcelona Sanchez, Antonio (ed.). 2000. Metaphor
and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea (eds). 2015. Diachronic
Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014. Functions
at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change. Leiden: Brill.
Biber, Douglas. 2004. “Historical
Patterns for the Grammatical Marking of Stance: A Cross-register Comparison”. Journal of
Historical
Pragmatics 5 (1): 107–136.
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan. 1988. “Adverbial
Stance Types in English”. Discourse
Processes 111: 1–34.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance
and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse
Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent and George Walkden. 2015. “On
Constructing a Theory of Grammatical Change”. Transactions of the Philological
Society 113 (3): 363–382.
Bybee, Joan L. 2013. “Usage-based Theory and Exemplar
Representation”. In Thomas Hoffman and Graeme Trousdale (eds), The
Oxford Handbook of Construction
Grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. and William Pagliuca. 1987. “The
Evolution of Future Meaning”. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini (eds), Papers
from the VIIth International Conference on Historical
Linguistics, 109–122. 9–13 September 1985. Pavia, Italy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chen, Changlai. 2013. “Jinran lei shuangyinci yanhua de xitongxing jiqi xiangguan wenti” [‘The Systematicity of the Development of the Disyllabic Temporal Words like jinlai and its
Related Issues’]. Journal of Shanghai Normal
University 42 (5): 99–110.
Conrad, Susan and Douglas Biber. 2000. “Adverbial
Marking of Stance in Speech and Writing”. In Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), Evaluation
in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of
Discourse, 56–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical
Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological
Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Degand, Liesbeth and Benjamin Fagard. 2011. “Alors
Between Discourse and Grammar: The Role of Syntactic Position”. Functions of
Language 18 (1): 29–56.
Degand, Liesbeth and Richard Waltereit. 2014. “Moi
je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi: French Disjoint Pronouns in the Left vs. Right
Periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse
Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change, 24–46. Brill: Leiden.
Du Bois, John W. 2007. “The Stance
Triangle”. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stance-taking
in
Discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. “How
Gradual Change Progresses: The Interaction between Convention and Innovation”. Language
Variation and
Change 28 (1): 83–102.
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic
Change: Functional and Formal
Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2006. “Towards
a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches
to Discourse Particles, 189–204. North Holland: Elsevier.
Fried, Mirjam. 2008. “Constructions
and Constructs: Mapping a Shift between Predication and
Attribution”. In Alexander Bergs and Gabriele Diewald (eds), Constructions
and Language
Change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli. 2014. “Italian
Guarda, Prego, Dai: Pragmatic markers and the left and right
periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Discourse
Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change, 117–150. Leiden: Brill.
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of
Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical
Syntax in Cross-Linguistic
Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hilpert, Martin. 2018. “Three
Open Questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar”. In Evie Coussé, Peter Andersson and Joel Olofsson (eds), Grammaticalization
Meets Construction
Grammar, 21–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. (Revised
edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hüning, Matthias and Geert Booij. 2014. “From
Compounding to Derivation: The Rise of Derivational Affixes through
Constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica (special issue on Refining
Grammaticalization edited by Ferdinand von Mengden and Horst Simon) 48 (2): 579–604.
Iwasaki, Shoichi and Foong Ha Yap (eds). 2015. “Stance-Marking
and Stance-Taking in Asian Languages”. Journal of Pragmatics (special
issue) 83 (1): 1–9.
Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The
Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical
Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of
English, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jucker, Andreas H. (ed.). 1995. Historical
Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of
English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. “New
Reflections on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New
Reflections on
Grammaticalization, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Li, Yuming. 1996. “Feiwei xingrongci de cilei diwei” [‘The Non-predicative
Adjectives as a Word Class’]. Chinese
Language 11: 1–9.
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1991. “Semantic
Change and Heterosemy in
Grammaticalization”. Language 67 (3): 475–509.
Lü, Shuxiang. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babaici [‘800 words in Modern
Chinese’]. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.
Luo, Zhufeng. 1993. Hanyu da Cidian [‘The Dictionary of
Chinese’]. Beijing: Hanyu da cidian chubanshe.
Meillet, Antoine. 1958
[1912]. “L’évolution des formes
grammaticales” [‘The Evolution of Grammatical
Forms’]. In Antoine Meillet (ed.), Linguistique
historique et linguistique
générale [‘Historical Linguistics and General Linguistics’], 130–148. Paris: Champion. (Originally
published in Scientia (Rivista di scienza) XXII, 1912).
Petré, Peter. 2014. Constructions
and Environments: Copular, Passive, and Related Constructions in Old and Middle
English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smirnova, Elena. 2015. “Constructionalization
and Constructional Change: The Role of Context in the Development of
Constructions”. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer and Spike Gildea (eds), Diachronic
Construction
Grammar, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-Order
Change and Grammaticalization in the History of
Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Tang, Weiqun. 2010. “Fuci
‘benlai’ he ‘benlai’ ju ‘Adverb ‘benlai’ and ‘benlai’ sentences”. Wuhan University Journal
(Humanity
Sciences) 63 (4): 477–482.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. “Subjectification in
Grammaticalization”. In Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds), Subjectivity
and
Subjectivisation, 31–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2004. “Historical
Pragmatics”. In Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward (eds), The
Handbook of
Pragmatics, 538–561. Oxford: Blackwell.
. 2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and
(Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification,
Intersubjectification and
Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
. 2012. “Intersubjectification and
Clause Periphery”. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde (eds), Intersections
of Intersubjectivity (special issue on English Text
Construction) 51: 7–28.
. 2014. “On the Function of the
Epistemic Adverbs Surely and No Doubt at the Left and Right Peripheries of the
Clause”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Functions
at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language
Change, 72–91. Leiden: Brill.
. 2020. “The Development of
‘Digressive’ Discourse-Topic Shift Markers in English”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1561: 121–135.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity
in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Ekkehard König. 1991. “The
Semantics–Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches
to
Grammaticalization, 189–218. (Volume I1.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization
and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet and Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. “On
Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change”. Studies in
Language 37 (3): 473–488.
Zhan, Fangqiong, Yue Zhang and Haiping Long. 2021. “Origin
of Modern Chinese Pragmatic Markers Bushi: Negative Copula or Negative
Adjective?” Lingua 2501: 102922.
Zhan, Fangqiong and Chaofen Sun. 2022. “The
Development of the Chinese Discourse Marker and Expressive Wanle”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1891: 37–54.
Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo and Yirong Chen. 2003. The
CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. –
present. Available online at the website of Center for Chinese Linguistics (abbreviated as CCL)
at: [URL]
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Mou, Zimeng
Zhan, Fangqiong
2025. The development of the Chinese multifunctional construction V+qilai
. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Zhan, Fangqiong
2025. Re-evaluating the dynamics of subjectification, intersubjectification, and textualization from a constructional
perspective. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 16:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Zhan, Fangqiong
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
