Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 22:1 (2021) ► pp.3468

References (45)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I Think – An English Modal Particle”. In Toril Swan and Olaf J. Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 1–47. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi. S. 2001. “Commas and Canaries: The Role of Punctuation in Speech and Writing”. Language Sciences 23 (1): 15–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 2006. “Discourse Markers in Italian: Towards a “Compositional” Meaning”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 449–464. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berry, D. H. 2006. Political Speeches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1998. “Between Brackets: (Some Properties of) Parenthetical Clauses in Latin. An Investigation of the Language of Cicero’s Letters”. In Rodie Risselada (ed.), Latin in Use: Amsterdam Studies in the Pragmatics of Latin, 1–17. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. “The Development of I Mean: Implications for the Study of Historical Pragmatics”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 37–79. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Discourse Markers”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charnavel, Isabelle. 2008. “Caractéristiques syntaxiques de la parenthèse en latin: linéarisation, délimitation et insertion” [“Syntactic characteristics of parenthesis in Latin: linearization, delimitation and insertion”]. Discours (online) 31. Published 23 May 2009 and downloaded 10 October 2012. Available online at: [URL]
Claridge, Claudia and Leslie Arnovick. 2010. “Pragmaticalisation and Discursisation”. In Irma Taavitsainen and Andreas H. Jucker (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 167–192. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conte, Gian Biagio. 2003. Dějiny římské literatury [‘History of Roman Literature’]. Translated by Daša Bartoňková, Petr Kyloušek, Jana Nechutová, Petra Psíková, Daniela Urbanová and Šárka Vilasová-Freddo. Praha: Koniasch Latin Press (KLP).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics 49 (2): 365–390. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. “Pragmatic Markers”. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 189–204. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging”. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider (ed.), New Approaches to Hedging, 15–34. Bingley, UK: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fugier, Huguette. 1991. “Nominal Anaphora, Text, Argumentation (from Plautus to Cicero)”. In Robert Coleman (ed.), New Studies in Latin Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 4th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, 382–399. Cambridge, UK. April 1987. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geymonat, Mario. 2008. “Grafia e interpunzione nell’ antichità greca e latina, nella cultura bizantina e nella latinità medievale” [“Writing and punctuation in Greek and Latin Antiquity, Byzantine Culture and Medieval Latinity”]. In Bice Mortara Garavelli (ed.), Storia della punteggiatura in Europa [‘History of Punctuation in Europe’], 27–62. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara. 2014. “The Development of Discourse and Pragmatic Markers”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 10–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli. 2015. “Attention Getters: Pragmatic Paths and Diachronic Developments from Latin to Italian”. Cuadernos de Filología Italiana 221: 21–47. Available online at: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. “On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), New Reflections on Grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–1247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen. 2013. English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ker, Walter C. A. 1957. Cicero Philippics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press and London: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja. 2015. “The Impact of Input and Output Domains: Towards a Function-based Categorization of Types of Grammaticalization”. Language Sciences 471: 172–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera. 2010. “From Verbs to Interactional Discourse Markers: The Pragmaticalization of Latin Rogo, Quaeso”. In Gualtiero Calboli and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), Papers on Grammar XI1, 181–192. Roma: Herder. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Verb-based Functional Markers in Latin: Morphosyntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics at a Crossroads [on-line]”. (submission version). Available online at: [URL]
. 2014. “The Development of Functional Roles and Romance Languages: Processes and Patterns”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 261–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Cicli di pragmaticalizzazione tra latino e lingue romanze: la formazione di marcatori interazionali” [“Cycles of Pragmaticalization between Latin and Romance Languages: Formation of Interactional Markers”]. In Michèle Fruyt, Gerd V. Haverling and Rosanna Sornicola (eds), Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013) [‘Proceedings from the 27th International Conference on Linguistics and Romance Philology (Nancy, 15–20 July 2013)’]. Section 2: Linguistique latine/linguistique romane [‘Section 2: Latin Linguistics/Romance Linguistics’], 151–162. Nancy: ATILF. Available online at: [URL]
Parkes, M. B. 1992. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax. (Volume I: The Simple Clause.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1989. “Latin Illocutionary Parentheticals”. In Marius Lavency and Dominique Longrée (eds), Actes du cinquième Colloque de Linguistique Latine. Louvain-la-Neuve/ Borzée, 31 mars – 4 avril 1989 [‘Proceedings from the 5th Colloquium on Latin Linguistics. Louvain-la-Neuve/ Borzée, 31 March – 4 April 1989’]. = Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 15 [‘Journal of The Department of Linguistics at Louvain’], 367–378. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange. 1991. “The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress”. American Speech 66 (3): 227–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah. 2009. “Coherence, Sentence Modification, and Sentence-part Modification : The Contribution of Particles”. In Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, 317–442. (Volume 1: Syntax of the Sentence.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker. 2007. “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. In Susan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 107–138. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taous, Tatiana. 2017. “The Dico Form: An Autonymous Marker”. Journal of Latin Linguistics 16 (2): 219–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2009. “Elementos parentéticos en la organización discursiva de la oratoria de Cicerón” [‘Parenthetical elements in the discourse organization in Cicero’s oratory’]. In Trinidad Arcos Pereira, Jorge Fernández López and Francisca Moya del Baño (eds), Pectora mulcet. estudios de retórica y oratoria latinas [‘Pectora mulcet. Studies in Latin Rhetoric and Oratory’], 247–258. Logroño: Instituto de Estudios Riojanos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Pragmaticalización y lenguas clásicas: el caso de latín abi” [‘Pragmaticalization and Classical Languages: The Case of Latin Abi’]. Graeco-Latina Brunensia 22 (1): 207–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincent, Diane and Sylvie Dubois. 1996. “A Study of the Use of Reported Speech in Spoken Language”. In Jennifer Arnold, Renee Blake and Brad Davidson (eds), Sociolinguistic Variation: Data, Theory, and Analysis. Selected Papers from NWAV 23 at Stanford, 361–374. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yonge, Charles Duke. 2014. The Tusculan Disputations. (Online.) Last updated 17 December 2014. Accessed 8 February 2017 at: [URL]
Texts and dictionaries
Tombeur, P. et al. 2015. Library of Latin Texts – Series A [database]. Centre Traditio Litterarum Occidentalium. Turnhout: Brepols. Available online at: [URL]. Thesaurus linguae Latinae 2004. [DVD-ROM: col.]. Third edition. Leipzig: K. G. Saur.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue