Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 18:1 (2017) ► pp.104–135

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Colloquialization in journalistic writing

The case of inserts with a focus on well

 | Philipps-University Marburg
 | University of Neuchâtel
Published online: 26 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18.1.05ruh
Abstract
Recent analyses of written text types have discovered significant frequency increases of colloquial or conversational elements, such as contractions, personal pronouns, questions or the progressive. This trend is often referred to as colloquialization. This paper presents a new perspective on colloquialization, with a special focus on the discourse marker well. The paper is divided into two parts. In the first part, we present new evidence of colloquialization on the basis of the TIME Magazine Corpus (Davies, Mark. 2007–. TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s–2000s. Available online at [URL].), which allows analyses of diachronic change in recent written American English. The focus of our analysis is on highly frequent “inserts” (Biber et al. 1999: 56), which are elements such as discourse markers (e.g., well and oh), backchannels (yeah, uh-huh, etc.), and hesitators (uh and um, etc.). We conclude that inserts significantly increase diachronically in TIME. In the second part of the paper, we focus on the element well in its function as a discourse marker. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative analytical steps, we analyze its diachronic development in terms of its structural contexts and its pragmatic functions, fleshing out how the process of colloquialization has affected its usage in recent written American English. We argue that the integration of corpus linguistic and pragmatic methods in this case study represents a new step towards the field of corpus pragmatics, that is, “the rapprochement between corpus linguistics and pragmatics and an integration of their key methodologies” (Rühlemann, Christoph and Karin Aijmer. 2014. “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar: 23).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methods and data
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Is there a trend?
    • 3.2Are there developmental stages in the data?
    • 3.3Concordance analyses of sentence-medial well
      • 3.3.1Quote-well
      • 3.3.2Clause-well
      • 3.3.3 Predicative-well
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Inserts
    • 4.2Quote-well
    • 4.3Clause-well
    • 4.4Predicative-well
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
References (48)
Sources
Davies, Mark. 2007–. TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s–2000s. Available online at [URL].
References
Aijmer, K. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2009. “The BE06 Corpus of British English and Recent Language Change”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (3): 312–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2003. “Compressed Noun-Phrase Structures in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy”. In Jean Aitchison and Diana M. Lewis (eds), New Media Language, 169–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 2009. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2006. [To be supplied].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Discourse Markers”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 285–314. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1998. Language Play. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The Stories of English. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. [To be supplied.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finell, Anne. 1989. “ Well now and then”. Journal of Pragmatics 131: 653–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990 “An Approach to Discource Markers”. Journal of Pragmatics 141: 383–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. and Sabine Stoll. 2009. “Finding Developmental Groups in Acquisition Data: Variability-based Neighbor Clustering”. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 16 (3): 217–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herlyn,. 1999. [To be supplied.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin and Stefan Th. Gries. 2009. “Assessing Frequency Changes in Multistage Diachronic Corpora: Applications for Historical Corpus Linguistics and the Study of Language Acquisition”. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24 (4): 385–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nick Smith, David Lee and Ylva Berglund Prytz, 2008. Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – A Practical Guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1993. “The Discourse Marker well: A Relevance – Theoretical Account”. Journal of Pragmatics 19 (5): 435–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. “The Discourse Marker well in the History of English”. English Language Linguistics 1 (1): 91–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. and Sara W. Smith. 1998. “And people just you know like ‘wow’: Discourse Markers as Negotiating Strategies”. In Andreas H. Jucker and Yael Ziv (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory, 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 2009. “Where Do We Backchannel? On The Use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like ”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (1): 81–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landert, Daniela and Andreas H. Jucker. 2011. “Private and Public in Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries”. Journal of Pragmatics 431: 1422–1434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 2003. “Modals on the Move: The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1991”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug and Frank R. Palmer (eds), Modality in Contemporary English, 223–240. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. and Nick Smith. 2009. “Change and Constancy in Linguistic Change: How Grammatical Usage in Written English Evolved in the Period 1931–1991”. In Antoinette Renouf and Andrew Kehoe (eds), Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, 173–200. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Action Formation and Action Ascription”. In Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers (eds), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, 103–130. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt and Corinne Rossari. 2005. “The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers: Introduction”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6 (2): 177–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Millar, Neil. 2009. “Modal Verbs in TIME: Frequency Changes 1923–2006”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (2): 191–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2007. Conversation in Context: A Corpus-driven Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Narrative in English Conversation: A Corpus Analysis of Storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph and Karin Aijmer. 2014. “Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations”. In Karin Aijmer and Christoph Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Gene H. Lerner. 2009. “Beginning to Respond: Well-prefaced Responses to Wh-questions”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42 (2): 91–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1985. “Conversational Coherence: The Role of well ”. Language 611: 640–667. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan. 1980. “Well in Conversation”. In Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech and Jan Svartvik (eds), Studies in English Linguistics: For Randolph Quirk, 167–177. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen (eds). 2014. Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini Bonelli, Elena. 2010. “The Evolution of Corpus Linguistics”. In Anne O’Keeffe and Michael McCarthy (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, 14–27. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 1991. “Conversational Style in British and American English: The Case of Backchannels”. In Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, 254–271. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Turn Management and the Fillers uh and um ”. In Karin Aijmer and Christopher Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, 381–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westin, Ingrid. 2002. Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (20)

Cited by 20 other publications

Daugs, Robert & Ulrike Schneider
2025. Negate me not, negate me never: cross-varietal distributional skews in modal negation from a diachronic perspective. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bernaisch, Tobias & Sven Leuckert
2024. Short-term diachronic and variety-internal approaches to textual functionality in South Asian Englishes. In Crossing Boundaries through Corpora [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 119], ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo, Turo Vartiainen & Jenni Räikkönen
2024. Democratisation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Salameh Jiménez, Shima
2024. Coloquialización, microdiacronías y consolidación de géneros orales en el siglo XX El léxico como parámetro de cambio en la retransmisión futbolística . In Partido a partido La lengua del fútbol , DOI logo
Salameh Jiménez, Shima
2024. Linguistic change in the 20th century. In Language Change in the 20th Century [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 340], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Salameh Jiménez, Shima
2025. Colloquialization Processes in the 20th Century: The Role of Discourse Markers in the Evolution of Sports Announcer Talk in Peninsular Spanish. Languages 10:7 ► pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Gerold & Maud Reveilhac
2023. Colloquialisation, compression and democratisation in British parliamentary debates. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 336 ff. DOI logo
Zhu, Haoran & Yueqing Deng
2023. Have media texts become more humorous?. The European Journal of Humour Research 11:3 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bourgeois, Samuel
2022. “Oh yeah, one more thing: It’s gonna be huge.”. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105], ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Guichao
2022. Christoph Rühlemann: Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics: A guide for research . Intercultural Pragmatics 19:4 ► pp. 537 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo
2021. Exploring sub-register variation in Victorian newspapers. In Corpus-based approaches to register variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103], ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo
2024. Early newspapers as data for corpus linguistics (and Digital Humanities). In Challenges in corpus linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 118], ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Marmorstein, Michal
2021. Discourse markers as a lens to variation across speech and writing. Functions of Language 28:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo & Lucía Loureiro-Porto
2020. Democratization of Englishes: synchronic and diachronic approaches. Language Sciences 79 ► pp. 101275 ff. DOI logo
Kytö, Merja
2019. Register in historical linguistics. Register Studies 1:1 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019. The English Phrasal Verb, 1650–Present, DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2018. TCU-initial backchannel overlap in storytelling. Narrative Inquiry 28:2 ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2019. How Long Does it Take to Say ‘Well’? Evidence from the Audio BNC. Corpus Pragmatics 3:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2020. Visual Linguistics with R, DOI logo
Rühlemann, Christoph
2020. What dialog is absent from constructed dialog?. English Text Construction 13:2 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue