Cover not available

Article published In: Periphery – Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Approaches:
Edited by Yuko Higashiizumi, Noriko O. Onodera and Sung-Ock S. Sohn
[Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2] 2016
► pp. 178–207

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Chinese interrogative particles as talk coordinators at the right periphery

A discourse–pragmatic perspective

 | Hong Kong Babtist University
 | Hong Kong Polytechnic University
 | City University of Hong Kong
Published online: 6 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.17.2.02cho
This paper examines how utterance-final interrogative particles in Chinese contribute to the management of local and global coherence in conversational discourse. Using Schiffrin’s (1987) model of discourse coherence, and focusing in particular on the Cantonese particle ho2 we show how an interrogative particle is often also used as an interactional particle. In the case of ho2, we show how this information-seeking particle is frequently recruited as an affirmation-seeking and solidarity-enhancing device. Special attention is given to the extended uses of ho2 in terms of Schiffrin’s exchange and action structures, as well as participation frameworks and information states. Our analysis highlights how speakers effectively use utterance particles as exemplified by ho2 to convey their (inter)subjective footing and in the process negotiate meaningful affiliative/disaffiliative interaction among interlocutors, and thereby achieve discourse coherence for effective communication.
References (40)
References
Boyle, Elizabeth Latimore. 1970. Cantonese: Basic Course. Washington, District of Columbia: US Govt Printing Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheung, Hung-nin S. 2007. A Grammar of Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong. (Revised edition.) Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea (eds). 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal particles: Categorization and Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis”. Discourse and Society 3 (2): 193–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fāng, Xia˘oyàn. 2004. Guǎngzhōu Fāngyán Jùmò Yǔqì Zhùcí [Sentence-final Mood Particles in Guangzhou Dialect]. Canton: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, Michael. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. (Translated by Allan Sheridan.) New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1988. “Types of English Discourse Markers”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1–4): 19–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. “Pragmatic markers”. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “An Account of Discourse Markers”. International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2): 293–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Juila A. 1980. Discourse Particles: An Analysis of the Role of y’know, I mean, well, and actually in Conversation. PhD thesis. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1989. “Current Developments in Conversation Analysis”. In Derek Roger and Peter Bull (eds), Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 21–47. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuong, Joaquim. 2008. “Yes/no Question Particles Revisited: The Grammatical Functions of mo4, me1, and maa3 ”. In Marjorie K.M. Chan and Hana Kang (eds), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), 715–33. Columbus. Distributed by The Ohio State University. Accessed 17 June 2015 at: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwok, Helen. 1984. Sentence Particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lam, Zoe Wai-Man. 2014. “A Complex ForceP for Speaker-and Addressee-oriented Discourse Particles in Cantonese”. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 35 (2): 61–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Law, Sum-Po. 1990. The Syntax and Phonology of Cantonese Sentence-Final Particles. PhD thesis. Boston University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, Chung-Sum. 2005. A Study of the Utterance Particles in Cantonese as Spoken in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leung, Wai-mun. 2006. On the Synchrony and Diachrony of Sentence Final Particles: The Case of wo in Cantonese. PhD thesis. University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Boya. 2006. Chinese Final Particles and the Syntax of the Periphery. PhD thesis. (LOT dissertation series.) Leiden Univeristy, Netherlands. Accessed 16 June 2015 at: [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles and Sandra Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lī, Xīnkúi, Jiājiào Huáng, Qíshēng Shī, Yún Mài and Dìngfāng Chén. 1995. Guǎngzhōu Fāngyán Yánjīu [A Study in Cantonese]. Canton: Guangdong People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luke, Kang-Kwong. 1988. A Conversation Analytic Approach to the Study of Utterance Particles in Cantonese. PhD thesis. University of York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mài, Yún and Bùyún Tán. 1997. Shíyòng Guǎngzhōuhuà Fēnlèi Cídiǎn [A Practical Thesaurus of Cantonese]. Canton: Guangdong People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen and Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1982. “The Symbolic Relationship between Pragmatic Particles and Impromptu Speech”. In Nils Erik Enkvist (ed.), Impromptu Speech: A Symposium, 147–77. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Péng, Xiǎocūn. 2010. Guǎngzhōuhuà Zhùcí Yánjiū [A Study of the Particles in Cantonese]. Canton: Jinan University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1982. “Ethnic Style in Male/Female Conversation”. In John Gumperz (ed.), Language and Social Identity, 217–231. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence C. 1983. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. PhD thesis. (Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 28.) Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1991 [1975]. “Indirect Speech Acts”. In S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A Reader, 265–77. First published in Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, 59–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint and Boya Li. 2007. “The Dissection and Structural Mapping of Cantonese Sentence Final Particles”. Lingua 117 (10): 1739–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wong, Hok-Yuen O., Ming-San C. Tse and Yam-Leung L. Cheung. 2013. “Two ‘Ho2’ in Cantonese, ho2?”. Paper presented at Annual Research Forum of Linguistic Society of Hong Kong 2013 . 30 November. Hong Kong.
Wu, Ruey-Jiuan Regina. 1997. “Transforming Participation Frameworks in Multi-Party Mandarin Conversation: The Use of Discourse Particles and Body Behavior”. Issues in Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 97–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yau, Shun-chiu. 1980. “Sentential Connotations in Cantonese”. Fāngyán 11: 35–52.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Lu, Man
2022. Polygrammaticalization: the morphemekoin the Miluo Xiang dialect. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:2 ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Yiu, Carine Yuk-man
2021. The origin and development of the question particle me1 in Cantonese. Lingua 254 ► pp. 103049 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Sze-Wing
2020. Cartographic syntax of performative projections: evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wakefield, John C.
2020. The Syntax and Semantics of Cantonese Particles in the Left Periphery. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Jiajun
2018. (Inter)subjectification at the left and right periphery: Deriving Chinese pragmatic marker bushi from the negative copula. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue