Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 20:1 (2019) ► pp.20–50
Articles
A corpus-based study of composite predicates in Early Modern English dialogues
Published online: 4 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16011.wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16011.wan
Abstract
Composite predicates (CPs), that is, complex predicate structures comprising a light verb and an eventive noun
(e.g., make a move or give a speech) are common in Present-day English and are particularly
characteristic of spoken language. The aim of the paper is to trace language changes involving CPs from 1560 to 1760, a period in
which the use of CPs has not yet received adequate scholarly attention. Specifically, the study examines the frequencies, lexical
productivity and syntactic patterns of CPs in two types of Early Modern English (EModE) dialogues, drawn from Trial Proceedings and Drama
Comedy sampled in A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 – a 1.2-million word computerized corpus of EModE
speech-related texts. The results reveal significant differences between the two types of dialogue and shed light on the
development of CPs in association with grammaticalization and lexicalization.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Material and methods
- 2.1Material
- 2.2Selection criteria and methods
- 3.Results
- 3.1Token frequency
- 3.2Lexical productivity
- 3.3Syntactic flexibility
- 3.3.1Morphological form of the deverbal noun
- 3.3.2Articles
- 4.Summary and conclusion
- Notes
Corpus References
References (30)
Algeo, John. 1995. “Have a Look at the Expanded Predicate”. In Bas Aarts and Charles F. Meyer (eds), The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, 203–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Brinton, Laurel. 2008. “‘Where Lexis and Grammar Meet’: Composite Predicates in English”. In Elena Seoane and Mariá José López-Couso (eds), Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Minoji Akimoto (eds). 1999. Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 1999. “Introduction”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gárate, T. Moralejo. 2002. “Composite Predicates and Modification Flexibility in Middle English”. Atlantis 24 (1): 299–302.
Herman, Vimala. 1995. Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London and New York: Routledge.
Hiltunen, Risto. 1999. “Verbal Phrases and Phrasal Verbs in Early Modern English”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 133–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Iglesias-Rábade, Luis. 2001. “Composite Predicates in Middle English with the Verbs nimen and taken
”. Studia Neophilologica 73 (2): 143–63.
Kennedy, Graeme. 2008. “Phraseology and Language Pedagogy: Semantic Preference Associated with English Verbs in the British National Corpus”. In Fanny Meunier and Sylviane Granger (eds), Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching, 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kytö, Merja. 1999. “Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Verbs in Early Modern English”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 167–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kytö, Merja and Terry Walker. 2006. Guide to A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 130. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Leech, Geoffrey, Paul Rayson and Andrew Wilson. 2001. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus. London: Longman.
Matsumoto, Meiko. 1999. “Composite Predicates in Middle English”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 59–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2005. “The Historical Development and Functional Characteristics of Composite Predicates with have and take in English”. English Studies 86 (5): 439–56.
Nickel, Gerhard. 1968. “Complex Verbal Structures in English”. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 1–21.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Stein, Gabriele. 1991. “The Phrasal Verb Type ‘to have a look’ in Modern English”. International Review of Applied Linguistics 29 (1): 1–29.
Stein, Gabriele and Randolph Quirk. 1991. “On Having a Look in a Corpus”. In Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, 197–203. London and New York: Longman.
Tanabe, Harumi. 1999. “Composite Predicates and Phrasal Verbs in The Paston Letters
”. In Laurel J. Brinton and Minoji Akimoto (eds), Collocational and Idiomatic Aspects of Composite Predicates in the History of English, 97–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wang, Ying. 2016. The Idiom Principle and L1 Influence: A Contrastive Learner-corpus Study of Delexical Verb + Noun Collocations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
