Cover not available

Article published In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Vol. 19:1 (2018) ► pp.55–91

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The evolution of the Ancient Greek deverbal pragmatic markers áge, íthi and phére

 | Ghent University, Belgium
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.16009.zak
Abstract
In this paper, I look at the Ancient Greek expressions áge, íthi and phére, which are all usually translated as ‘come (on)’. After discussing some existing accounts of these items, I look at their structural – syntactic properties and argue that they can be regarded as pragmaticalized imperatives. Then, I propose a new interpretation of their function – on this analysis, they can be regarded as conversational “boosters”, increasing the degree of strength of the illocutionary point of the utterance. Finally, I look at their diachronic development – in the corpus under consideration, áge is gradually replaced by íthi as the expression used with other imperatives, while phére develops as the preferred expression for use with non-imperative directive utterances.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Earlier accounts
  • 3. Áge, íthi and phére as grammaticalized imperatives
    • 3.1The structural criteria
    • 3.2The semantic criteria
      • 3.2.1Conceptual > procedural
      • 3.2.2Non-subjective > (inter)subjective
  • 4.The semantics of áge, íthi and phére revisited
  • 5. Áge, íthi and phére: Synonyms or not?
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (81)
References
Allan, Rutger J. 2015. “Classifying Greek Particles: A Functional Discourse Grammar Approach”. Paper presented at the International Colloquium on Ancient Greek Linguistics . 23–27 March 2015. Rome.
Aijmer, Karine. 1997. “I think – an English Modal Particle”. In Torial Swan and Olaf J. Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. 1999. “The Myth of Conventional Implicature”. Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4): 327–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Stéphanie J. 2009. “On the Curious Combination of the Particles γάρ and οὖν”. In Stéphanie Bakker and Gerry Wakker (eds), Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, 41–61. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Stéphanie and Gerry Wakker (eds). 2009. Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla, Cristina Bosco, Alessandro Garcea, Barbara Gili Fivela, Johanna Miecznikowski and Francesca Tini Brunozzi. 2007. “Italian allora, French alors: Functions, Convergences and Divergences”. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 61: 9–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate and Ulrich Detges (eds). 2014. Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellocchi, Margherita. 2015. “Comedy, Diction of”. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Consulted online on 26 August 2016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biraud, Michèle. 2010. Les interjections du théâtre grec antique. Étude sémantique et pragmatique. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “‘So’ as a constraint on relevance”. In Ruth M. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, 183–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolly, Catherine and Liesbeth Degand. 2013. “Have You Seen What I Mean? From Verbal Constructions to Discourse Markers”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14 (2): 210–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2001. “From Matrix Clause to Pragmatic Marker: The History of look-forms”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (2): 177–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2005. “Processes Underlying the Development of Pragmatic Markers: The Case of (I) say ”. In Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen and Brita Wårvik (eds), Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past, 279–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia. 1999. “On Mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics 311: 881–909. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción. 2006. “Subjectification of Verbs into Discourse Markers: Semantic – Pragmatic Change Only?” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 20 (1): 97–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curcó, Carmen. 2011. “On the Status of Procedural Meaning in Natural Language”. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern (eds), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 33–54. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Des Places, Édouard. 1929. Études sur quelques particules de liaison chez Platon. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. “Pragmaticalization (Defined) as Grammaticalization of Discourse Functions”. Linguistics 49 (2): 365–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara and Chiara Ghezzi. 2014. “The Pragmaticalization of Verbs of Movement and Exchange in Latin and Italian: Paths of Development from Lexicon to Pragmatics”. In Ilona Badescu and Mihaela Popescu (eds), Studia Linguistica et Philologica in honorem Prof. Univ. Dr. Michaela Livescu, 116–39. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara, Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli. 2012. “Constraining Pragmaticalization: Paths of Development from Lexicon to Discourse”. Paper presented at the conference New Reflections on Grammaticalization 5 . 16–19 July 2012. Edinburgh.
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. “A Dynamic-Interactional Approach to Discourse Markers”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 359–74. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fränkel, Eduard. 1964. Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, vol. 1. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1980. “Conversational Mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 341–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara and Piera Molinelli. 2014. “Italian guarda, prego, dai: Pragmatic Markers and the Left and Right Periphery”. In Kate Beeching and Ulrich Detges (eds), Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change, 117–50. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakis, Georgios K. 2015. Giannakis, “Indo-European Linguistic Background”. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Consulted online on 26 August 2016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014a. “Cyclicity in Semantic/Pragmatic Change: The Medieval Particle ja between Latin iam and Modern French déjà ”. In Chiara Ghezzi and Piera Molinelli (eds), Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, 139–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Phénomènes de cyclicité dans l’évolution des marqueurs pragmatiques”. Paper presented at the Journée d’études sur les particules discursives . 18–19 December 2014. Nancy.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard and Corinne Rossari. 2005. “The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6 (2): 177–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2013. “On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization or Something Else?” Linguistics 51 (6): 1205–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1984. “Modifying Illocutionary Force”. Journal of Pragmatics 81: 345–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. “On Some Principles of Grammaticalization”. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds), Approaches to Grammaticalization I, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janse, Mark. 1993. “The Prosodic Basis of Wackernagel’s Law”. In André Crochetière, Jean-Claude Boulanger and Conrad Ouellon (eds), Actes du XVe Congrès international des linguistes IV, 19–22. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Clitic Doubling from Ancient to Asia Minor Greek”. In Dalina Kallulli and Liliane Tasmowski (eds), Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages, 165–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaczko, Sara. 2015. “Tragedy, Diction of”. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Consulted online on 26 August 2016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith. 1985. “The Independence of Syntax and Phonology in Cliticization”. Language 611: 95–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotzia, Paraskevi and Maria Chriti. 2015. “Ancient Philosophers on Language”. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Consulted online on 26 August 2016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamiroy, Béatrice and Pierre Swiggers. 1991. “The Status of Imperatives as Discourse Signals”. In Suzanne Fleischman and Linda R. Waugh (eds), Discourse – Pragmatics and the Verb: The Evidence from Romance, 120–46. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e Stile 201: 303–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Létoublon, Françoise. 2015. “Formulaic Language”. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Consulted online on 26 August 2016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolle, Steve. 1997. “Conceptual and Procedural Encoding: Criteria for the Identification of Linguistically Encoded Procedural Information”. In Marjolein Groefsema (ed.), Proceedings of the University of Hertfordshire Relevance Theory Workshop, 47–56. Hatfield Peverel: Peter Thomas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “A Relevance Theory Perspective on Grammaticalization”. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 1–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization”. In Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 322–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reece, Steve. 2015. “Formulas”. In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Consulted online on 26 August 2016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis. 2011. “On Some Methodological Issues in the Conceptual/Procedural Distinction”. In Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti and Aoife Ahern (eds), Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, 55–79. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2001. “Illocutionary Force and Degrees of Strength in Language Use”. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 1791–814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheppers, Frank. 2011. The Colon Hypothesis: Word Order, Discourse Segmentation and Discourse Coherence in Ancient Greek. Brussels: VUBPRESS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence. 1999. “Discourse Markers”. Lingua 1071: 227–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard. 1950. Griechische Grammatik: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik (Zweiter Band). München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommerstein, Alan H. 2014. “Oratory and Rhetoric”. In Alan H. Sommerstein and Isabelle C. Torrance (eds), Oaths and Swearing in Ancient Greece, 230–39. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew and Ana R. Luís. 2012. Clitics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. (Second edition.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 2012. “Spanish Venga and its English Equivalents: A Contrastive Study of Teenage Talk”. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 61: 57–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thaler, Verena. 2012. “Mitigation as Modification of Illocutionary Force”. Journal of Pragmatics 441: 907–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. “Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization”. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 406–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “The Role of the Development of Discourse Markers in a Theory of Grammaticalization”. Paper presented at ICHL XII , Manchester 1995 (Version of 11/97).
. 2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment”. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens (eds), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Richard B. Dasher. 2005. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1998. “On the Logical Form of Illocutionary Acts”. In Asa Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts (Volume II: Speech Act Theory and Particular Speech Acts), 170–94. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verano, Rodrigo. 2015. La reformulación discursiva en griego antiguo . Un estudio sobre La Républica de Pláton. Dissertation. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jakob. 1892. “Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung”. Indogermanische Forschungen 11: 333–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2006. “The Rise of Discourse Markers in Italian: A Specific Type of Language Change”. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 61–76. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wills, Jeffrey. 1993. “Homeric Particle Order”. Historische Sprachforschung 106 (1): 61–81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre and Dan Sperber. 1993. “Linguistic Form and Relevance”. Lingua 901: 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “Mood and the Analysis of Non-Declarative Sentences”. In Asa Kasher (ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Concepts (Volume II: Speech Act Theory and Particular Speech Acts), 268–89. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zakowski, Samuel. 2014. “εἰπέ μοι as a Parenthetical: A Structural and Functional Analysis, from Homer to Menander”. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 54 (2): 157–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

la Roi, Ezra
2021. The Insubordination of If- and That-Clauses from Archaic to Post-Classical Greek: A Diachronic Constructional Typology. Symbolae Osloenses 95:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2022. Weaving together the diverse threads of category change. Diachronica 39:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue